On Saturday, 19 April 2025 18:23:06 Central European Summer Time Mattia
Rizzolo wrote:
> But I recommend you just leverage control commands while filing, since
> ftp-master tools just parse the subject:
Good idea !
Thanks both for the help
On Fri, Apr 18, 2025 at 03:46:03PM +0200, Dominique Dumont wrote:
> But I forgot that all raku-modules are Architecture: any, which means that
> all
> these module must also be removed from unstable/arm*.
>
> There are 19 packages to be removed from arm*.
>
> Should I log one bug for all 19 pac
Hi
On 18-04-2025 15:46, Dominique Dumont wrote:
Should I log one bug for all 19 packages, or one bug per package ?
I'm pretty sure ftp-master has workflows that desire one bug per package
as I've seen that request often enough.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital sig
Hi
Currently rakudo cannot be shipped on arm architectures because of build
issues. Upstream is working in this, but in the meantime, raku is not suitable
for ARM.
I've required the removal of moarm, nqp and rakudo from unstable/arm*, which
was done a few days ago.
But I forgot that all
On Sat, Jun 05, 2021 at 01:19:10PM -0400, Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside wrote:
If you'd have took time to explain the real reason behind why choosing a
RPi4 maybe a good idea versus simply saying they are better than other
choices. Then I would have considered much more knowledgeable your
opini
On 06/06/2021 11:43, Aaron Dewes wrote:
I personally prefer the Raspi 4 because it can run plain Debian in a
way supported by a Debian Developer
I'm interested in this version, do you know how it is built (Manually,
or is there a build script to verify the images)?
Does the RPi4 is totally
On Sun, 6 Jun 2021 12:43:53 +0200, Aaron Dewes
wrote:
>> I personally prefer the Raspi 4 because it can run plain Debian in a
>> way supported by a Debian Developer
>
>I'm interested in this version, do you know how it is built (Manually,
>or is there a build script to verify the images)?
Guido h
Marc Haber wrote...
> On Sat, 5 Jun 2021 10:50:20 +0200, Christoph Biedl
> wrote:
> >For me, the biggest downside of the RPi4 is the need for an extra power
> >plug as they take up to three amps - while for example a BananaPi can be
> >powered using some unused USB (<= 3.0) port.
>
> Mine run vi
On Sun, 2021-06-06 at 12:43 +0200, Aaron Dewes wrote:
> > I personally prefer the Raspi 4 because it can run plain Debian in
> > a
> > way supported by a Debian Developer
>
> I'm interested in this version, do you know how it is built
> (Manually,
> or is there a build script to verify the images)
On Sun, Jun 06, 2021 at 12:43:53PM +0200, Aaron Dewes wrote:
> > I personally prefer the Raspi 4 because it can run plain Debian in a
> > way supported by a Debian Developer
>
> I'm interested in this version, do you know how it is built (Manually,
> or is there a build script to verify the images
I personally prefer the Raspi 4 because it can run plain Debian in a
way supported by a Debian Developer
I'm interested in this version, do you know how it is built (Manually,
or is there a build script to verify the images)?
Does the RPi4 is totally 64 bit ?
It can run plain Debian arm64. Is
On Sun, 6 Jun 2021 05:44:21 +, Paul Wise wrote:
>On Sat, Jun 5, 2021 at 4:28 PM Marc Haber wrote:
>
>> I haven't advanced to package cross-building yet.
>
>Some resources related to that:
>
>http://crossqa.debian.net/
>https://wiki.debian.org/CrossCompiling
Thanks!
Greetings
Marc
--
---
On Sat, 5 Jun 2021 13:19:10 -0400, Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside
wrote:
>I think you didn't get much what I said...
Probably.
>If you'd have took time to explain the real reason behind why choosing a
>RPi4 maybe a good idea versus simply saying they are better than other
>choices. Then I would
Hello, hope this works, am not normally subscribed to debian-devel
> If you'd have took time to explain the real reason behind why choosing a
> RPi4 maybe a good idea versus simply saying they are better than other
> choices. Then I would have considered much more knowledgeable your
> opinions and
On Sb, 05 iun 21, 19:01:36, Adam Borowski wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 05, 2021 at 03:04:45PM +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
>
> > The PINE A64+ (2 GB RAM) is very stable for me, unless I put significant
> > load on the USB connection (specifically *heavy* writing to an external
> > HDD in a powered enclo
On Sat, Jun 5, 2021 at 4:28 PM Marc Haber wrote:
> I haven't advanced to package cross-building yet.
Some resources related to that:
http://crossqa.debian.net/
https://wiki.debian.org/CrossCompiling
--
bye,
pabs
https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
On Sat, Jun 05, 2021 at 01:19:10PM -0400, Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside wrote:
> Does the RPi4 is totally 64 bit ?
Does using arm64 (as described on https://wiki.debian.org/RaspberryPi and
https://raspi.debian.net/) count or are you asking about something on top
of that?
--
WBR, wRAR
signatur
Hi,
On 2021-06-05 1:01 p.m., Adam Borowski wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 05, 2021 at 03:04:45PM +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
>> Any of the boards from pine64.org should do and as far as I know have
>> quite good support (i.e. there are Debian Installer images for them) and
>> all are 64 bit ;)
>
> +1 to
Hi,
On 2021-06-05 12:24 p.m., Marc Haber wrote:
> On Sat, 5 Jun 2021 04:39:08 -0400, Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside
> wrote:
>> I always appreciate all opinions. But what I surely dislike is people
>> that put others option down to raiser their own.
>
> If that was targeted at me, duly noted. I
On Sat, Jun 05, 2021 at 03:04:45PM +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> Any of the boards from pine64.org should do and as far as I know have
> quite good support (i.e. there are Debian Installer images for them) and
> all are 64 bit ;)
+1 to pine64 gear.
> The PINE A64+ (2 GB RAM) is very stable for
On Sat, 5 Jun 2021 10:50:20 +0200, Christoph Biedl
wrote:
>Marc Haber wrote...
>> I'd still consider the Raspberry Pi. It's unfortunate that the binary
>> non-free blob is already needed to boot the box even if one doesn't
>> need/use the GPU after booting, but it is reasonably common that
>> peop
On Sat, 5 Jun 2021 04:39:08 -0400, Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside
wrote:
>I always appreciate all opinions. But what I surely dislike is people
>that put others option down to raiser their own.
If that was targeted at me, duly noted. I will refrain from spending
time with your requests in the fu
On 2021-06-05 15:04:45 +0300 (+0300), Andrei POPESCU wrote:
[...]
> For a cheap board now I'd probably go for a ROCK64 (USB3 instead
> of USB2), or even a RockPro64 (better CPU, PCIe, unfortunately
> limited to 4 GB RAM).
>
> Heating could also be an issue under load, so you should consider
> gett
On Sb, 05 iun 21, 01:16:44, Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside wrote:
> Hi !
> I'm looking for a ARM platform that can easily run Linux.
> Support using terminal over serial port for booting (no need of a GPU).
>
> I know about the Raspberry PI but the GPU drivers are not open source.
> I don't reall
On Sat, Jun 05, 2021 at 07:33:20AM -0400, Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2021-06-05 4:50 a.m., Christoph Biedl wrote:
> > Marc Haber wrote...
> >
> >> I'd still consider the Raspberry Pi. It's unfortunate that the binary
> >> non-free blob is already needed to boot the box ev
Quoting Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside (2021-06-05 13:33:20)
> I saw a board on AliExpress that offer some AllWonder A33 with 1 or
> 2Gb RAM for a really good price.
Since you asked on a Debian mailinglist, beware that not all ARM boards
sold on AliBaba is supported in Debian.
Also, company is
Hi,
On 2021-06-05 4:50 a.m., Christoph Biedl wrote:
> Marc Haber wrote...
>
>> I'd still consider the Raspberry Pi. It's unfortunate that the binary
>> non-free blob is already needed to boot the box even if one doesn't
>> need/use the GPU after booting, but it is reasonably common that
>> people
On 05/06/2021 09:46, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
On Sat, Jun 05, 2021 at 04:39:08AM -0400, Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside wrote:
I do agree that the Raspberry is able to run up to 4 Gb, but there's
other board too.
(to 8 actually)
Yes I agree on 8, the Raspberry pi 400 is still 4gb though,
On Sat, Jun 05, 2021 at 11:22:46AM +0530, Siji Sunny wrote:
> > Hi !
> > I'm looking for a ARM platform that can easily run Linux.
> > Support using terminal over serial port for booting (no need of a GPU).
> >
> > I know about the Raspberry PI but the GPU drivers are not open source.
> > I don't r
Marc Haber wrote...
> I'd still consider the Raspberry Pi. It's unfortunate that the binary
> non-free blob is already needed to boot the box even if one doesn't
> need/use the GPU after booting, but it is reasonably common that
> people care about their software on the platform, and it's also
> a
On Sat, Jun 05, 2021 at 04:39:08AM -0400, Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside wrote:
> I do agree that the Raspberry is able to run up to 4 Gb, but there's
> other board too.
(to 8 actually)
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hi,
On 2021-06-05 4:08 a.m., Marc Haber wrote:
> On Sat, 5 Jun 2021 01:16:44 -0400, Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside
> wrote:
>> I'm looking for a ARM platform that can easily run Linux.
>> Support using terminal over serial port for booting (no need of a GPU).
>>
>> I know about the Raspberry PI
On Sat, Jun 5, 2021 at 8:08 AM Marc Haber wrote:
> I'd still consider the Raspberry Pi. It's unfortunate that the binary
> non-free blob is already needed to boot the box
There is a free replacement for the binary non-free blob here:
https://github.com/librerpi/rpi-open-firmware/
Unfortunately
Quoting Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside (2021-06-05 07:16:44)
> Hi !
> I'm looking for a ARM platform that can easily run Linux.
> Support using terminal over serial port for booting (no need of a GPU).
>
> I know about the Raspberry PI but the GPU drivers are not open source.
> I don't really nee
On Sat, 5 Jun 2021 01:16:44 -0400, Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside
wrote:
>I'm looking for a ARM platform that can easily run Linux.
>Support using terminal over serial port for booting (no need of a GPU).
>
>I know about the Raspberry PI but the GPU drivers are not open source.
>I don't really ne
Hi,
On 2021-06-05 1:52 a.m., Siji Sunny wrote:
>
> Hi !
> I'm looking for a ARM platform that can easily run Linux.
> Support using terminal over serial port for booting (no need of a GPU).
>
> I know about the Raspberry PI but the GPU drivers are not open source.
> I don't r
> Hi !
> I'm looking for a ARM platform that can easily run Linux.
> Support using terminal over serial port for booting (no need of a GPU).
>
> I know about the Raspberry PI but the GPU drivers are not open source.
> I don't really need a GPU, if I do need graphics then I could always go
> with a
Hi !
I'm looking for a ARM platform that can easily run Linux.
Support using terminal over serial port for booting (no need of a GPU).
I know about the Raspberry PI but the GPU drivers are not open source.
I don't really need a GPU, if I do need graphics then I could always go
with a X over Ethern
38 matches
Mail list logo
