Re: apt-0.0.16 and libc6-2.0.7r2

1998-06-25 Thread Scott K. Ellis
On Thu, Jun 25, 1998 at 09:16:25AM -0500, Douglas Bates wrote: > I haven't been following the discussion on the libc6 naming (too > little time, I'm afraid) so I may have missed any fixes to this. I > have apt 0.0.16-1 and libc6 2.0.7r-2 installed. I installed apt > befor

apt-0.0.16 and libc6-2.0.7r2

1998-06-25 Thread Douglas Bates
I haven't been following the discussion on the libc6 naming (too little time, I'm afraid) so I may have missed any fixes to this. I have apt 0.0.16-1 and libc6 2.0.7r-2 installed. I installed apt before the upgrade of libc6. Now the first thing that apt wants to do when you run it is

Re: APT 0.0.16

1998-06-11 Thread Steve Dunham
Paul Seelig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jason Gunthorpe) writes: > > > APT 0.0.16 is available for both bo and hamm. Please let me know if there > > are any bugs that got missed, I'm getting very few bug reports these days. > It is runni

Re: APT 0.0.16

1998-06-11 Thread Brandon Mitchell
On Wed, 10 Jun 1998, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > APT 0.0.16 is available for both bo and hamm. Please let me know if there > are any bugs that got missed, I'm getting very few bug reports these days. Just grabbed it after doing a dselect update and select with apt 15. Went back to dse

APT 0.0.16

1998-06-11 Thread Jason Gunthorpe
APT 0.0.16 is available for both bo and hamm. Please let me know if there are any bugs that got missed, I'm getting very few bug reports these days. Thanks, Jason -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]