Re: A message from CMake upstream: announcing dh-cmake

2018-11-19 Thread Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult
On 06.07.18 22:00, Colin Watson wrote: > If the libraries in question are DFSG-free themselves, there's no DFSG > issue and you don't need to remove them from the tarball (and we'd > generally encourage not modifying the upstream tarball unnecessarily for > upload to Debian). The policy about bun

Re: A message from CMake upstream: announcing dh-cmake

2018-07-11 Thread Kyle Edwards
On Wed, 2018-07-11 at 08:57 -0300, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: > But no, my real fear here was a tool more in the cpack kind. Years > ago we had packagers trying to get their stuff in by using cpack. > While it might be of some help for non official packages it was not > really fit f

Re: A message from CMake upstream: announcing dh-cmake

2018-07-11 Thread Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
El mié., 11 de jul. de 2018 07:33, Ian Jackson < ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk> escribió: > [snip] I really don't agree with the thrust of Lisandro's comments. AFAICT > what Lisandro is saying is this: because the upstream components may > not always be perfect; and even may be totally inappro

Re: A message from CMake upstream: announcing dh-cmake

2018-07-11 Thread Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
El mar., 10 de jul. de 2018 15:46, Kyle Edwards escribió: > On Tue, 2018-07-10 at 12:52 -0300, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer > wrote: > > Well, there are cases when upstream is doing things the right way > > with respect to Debian but... what about derivatives (distributions > > which base

Re: A message from CMake upstream: announcing dh-cmake

2018-07-11 Thread Ian Jackson
Kyle Edwards writes ("Re: A message from CMake upstream: announcing dh-cmake"): > I understand what you're saying. As a concrete example, we all know > that Debian requires *.so library symlinks to live in the -dev package. > But let's say there's a hypothetic

Re: A message from CMake upstream: announcing dh-cmake

2018-07-10 Thread Kyle Edwards
On Tue, 2018-07-10 at 12:52 -0300, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: > Well, there are cases when upstream is doing things the right way > with respect to Debian but... what about derivatives (distributions > which base themselves in Debian)? Sometimes they need something > different, and

Re: A message from CMake upstream: announcing dh-cmake

2018-07-10 Thread Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
El viernes, 6 de julio de 2018 12:59:58 -03 Kyle Edwards escribió: > On Thu, 2018-07-05 at 14:04 -0300, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer > > wrote: > > From what you write above I tend to think that simply by not using > > dh-cmake whatever upstream has defined as packaging it will be simply >

Re: A message from CMake upstream: announcing dh-cmake

2018-07-06 Thread gregor herrmann
On Sat, 07 Jul 2018 00:25:15 +0200, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > On Fri, Jul 06, 2018 at 04:40:44PM -0400, Kyle Edwards wrote: > > On Fri, 2018-07-06 at 21:00 +0100, Colin Watson wrote: > > > If the libraries in question are DFSG-free themselves, there's no > > > DFSG issue and you don't need to remove

Re: A message from CMake upstream: announcing dh-cmake

2018-07-06 Thread Geert Stappers
On Sat, Jul 07, 2018 at 12:25:15AM +0200, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > On Fri, Jul 06, 2018 at 04:40:44PM -0400, Kyle Edwards wrote: > > On Fri, 2018-07-06 at 21:00 +0100, Colin Watson wrote: > > > If the libraries in question are DFSG-free themselves, there's no > > > DFSG issue and you don't need to r

Re: A message from CMake upstream: announcing dh-cmake

2018-07-06 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
On Fri, Jul 06, 2018 at 04:40:44PM -0400, Kyle Edwards wrote: > On Fri, 2018-07-06 at 21:00 +0100, Colin Watson wrote: > > If the libraries in question are DFSG-free themselves, there's no > > DFSG issue and you don't need to remove them from the tarball (and > > we'd generally encourage not modify

Re: A message from CMake upstream: announcing dh-cmake

2018-07-06 Thread Kyle Edwards
On Fri, 2018-07-06 at 21:00 +0100, Colin Watson wrote: > If the libraries in question are DFSG-free themselves, there's no > DFSG issue and you don't need to remove them from the tarball (and > we'd generally encourage not modifying the upstream tarball > unnecessarily for upload to Debian).  The p

Re: A message from CMake upstream: announcing dh-cmake

2018-07-06 Thread Colin Watson
On Fri, Jul 06, 2018 at 11:59:58AM -0400, Kyle Edwards wrote: > I have a question about this (and I apologize if this is slightly off > topic): VTK includes "convenience copies" of third-party libraries it > uses to avoid "dependency hell", and also because we've made > modifications to them that h

Re: A message from CMake upstream: announcing dh-cmake

2018-07-06 Thread Kyle Edwards
On Thu, 2018-07-05 at 14:04 -0300, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: > From what you write above I tend to think that simply by not using > dh-cmake whatever upstream has defined as packaging it will be simply > ignored (ie, it will become a "standard" CMake project). Yes, this is true. d

Re: A message from CMake upstream: announcing dh-cmake

2018-07-05 Thread Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
El jueves, 5 de julio de 2018 10:20:55 -03 Kyle Edwards escribió: > Hi Lisandro, > > Thank you for expressing your concerns. You bring up some very valid > points, and I will try to address all of them here. [snip] > > If upstream happens to be the Debian maintainer then *maybe* this > > might be

Re: A message from CMake upstream: announcing dh-cmake

2018-07-05 Thread Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
El jueves, 5 de julio de 2018 12:11:36 -03 Kyle Edwards escribió: > So, to clarify: we've changed VTK to use GNUInstallDirs, which *itself* > sets the proper directories for Debian, as I will explain below. > > On Thu, 2018-07-05 at 15:38 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote: > > debhelper's Debian::Debhel

Re: A message from CMake upstream: announcing dh-cmake

2018-07-05 Thread Kyle Edwards
So, to clarify: we've changed VTK to use GNUInstallDirs, which *itself* sets the proper directories for Debian, as I will explain below. On Thu, 2018-07-05 at 15:38 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote: > debhelper's Debian::Debhelper::BuildSystem::cmake already passes > -DCMAKE_INSTALL_LIBDIR=lib/$DEB_HOS

Re: A message from CMake upstream: announcing dh-cmake

2018-07-05 Thread Simon McVittie
On Thu, 05 Jul 2018 at 09:20:55 -0400, Kyle Edwards wrote: > Our plan is to > change VTK's upstream CMake scripts to make it more distro-friendly, > then provide packaging scripts that take advantage of these changes. > (We've already made some of these changes in the latest VTK master - it > now a

Re: A message from CMake upstream: announcing dh-cmake

2018-07-05 Thread Kyle Edwards
On Wed, 2018-07-04 at 11:30 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > I think you can solve the lintian warning >   W: dh-cmake source: ancient-python-version-field x-python3-version > 3.2 > by simply removing >   X-Python3-Version: >= 3.2 > from d/control. Thanks for the tip, we will fix this in the next rel

Re: A message from CMake upstream: announcing dh-cmake

2018-07-05 Thread Kyle Edwards
Hi Lisandro, Thank you for expressing your concerns. You bring up some very valid points, and I will try to address all of them here. On Wed, 2018-07-04 at 14:40 -0300, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: > I even use it for 99% of my personal/job projects! Glad to hear it! > If upstream

Re: A message from CMake upstream: announcing dh-cmake

2018-07-04 Thread Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
El martes, 3 de julio de 2018 16:56:42 -03 Kyle Edwards escribió: > Hello everyone! Hi Kyle! > My name is Kyle. I work at Kitware, Inc., the upstream maintainer of > the CMake buildsystem (https://www.cmake.org/) and VTK, the > Visualization Toolkit (https://www.vtk.org/). I'm Lisandro and, eve

Re: A message from CMake upstream: announcing dh-cmake

2018-07-04 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Kyle, On Tue, Jul 03, 2018 at 03:56:42PM -0400, Kyle Edwards wrote: > Hello everyone! > > My name is Kyle. I work at Kitware, Inc., the upstream maintainer of > the CMake buildsystem (https://www.cmake.org/) and VTK, the > Visualization Toolkit (https://www.vtk.org/). As some of you on the > D

Re: A message from CMake upstream: announcing dh-cmake

2018-07-03 Thread Paul Wise
On Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 3:56 AM, Kyle Edwards wrote: > Our end goal is to get both dh-cmake and VTK into Debian proper, but it > is still in an experimental state, and there is still a lot of work to > be done yet. We would like to get some feedback on dh-cmake, and we > will eventually file a form

A message from CMake upstream: announcing dh-cmake

2018-07-03 Thread Kyle Edwards
Hello everyone! My name is Kyle. I work at Kitware, Inc., the upstream maintainer of the CMake buildsystem (https://www.cmake.org/) and VTK, the Visualization Toolkit (https://www.vtk.org/). As some of you on the Debian Science list may have heard, we are making an effort to officially support our

Bug#611895: ITP: django-kombu -- Kombu transport using the Django database as a message store

2011-02-03 Thread Fladischer Michael
: Python Description : Kombu transport using the Django database as a message store This package provides a message store for Kombu inside a Django database. It is intended be used together with python-kombu and provides a transport for it. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG

InterScan MSS has quarantined a message

2007-03-11 Thread InterScan MSS Notification
Message Sender :debian-devel@lists.debian.org Message Recipients :[EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Subject:Re: Important document Large Attachment Message Current action taken:Quarantine Date and Time of Incident:Mon Mar 12 00:03:19 2007 Information transmitted by this e-mail is proprietary t

InterScan MSS has quarantined a message

2006-06-15 Thread MBT INTERSCAN SH1
InterScan Messaging Security Suite notification -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

AlaskanAIDS.Org Mail Security detected a virus in a message sent from your address (SYM:11928753823948261362)

2006-05-01 Thread MailSecurity
Subject of the message: Status Recipient of the message: James Stevens -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

InterScan MSS has deleted a message

2005-04-11 Thread IMSS
This notification has been sent to inform you that a message has been quarantined by MTEC company policies. Mail from: debian-devel@lists.debian.org Sent to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Good day Reason: Global Policy, Antivirus Filter -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a

ISMSS DomIscanInt-ATN(169.202.3.81) has deleted a message. (D & N)

2005-01-05 Thread S200INT004001
The mail has an attachment not with in the Security policy CONTENT FILTER, Filter Type: Advanced Content Filter Event: at CanonKZN-Attachment-Warning.txt:CONTENT , "message.zip" violated Action on Attachment: STRIP ,has taken the following action against the message: Delete. ___

Norton AntiVirus failed to scan an attachment in a message you sent.

2003-10-16 Thread 10AntiVirus
Recipient of the attachment: SEXCHANGE, RADIANT\RII, StellaHsieh(謝立欣)/刪除的郵件 Subject of the message: Re: That movie No action was taken on the attachment. Attachment document_9446.pif was Logged Only for the following reasons: Scan Engine Failure (0x80004005)

Norton AntiVirus failed to scan an attachment in a message you sent.

2003-10-10 Thread 10AntiVirus
Recipient of the attachment: SEXCHANGE, RADIANT\RII, StellaHsieh(謝立欣)/刪除的郵件 Subject of the message: Re: That movie No action was taken on the attachment. Attachment document_9446.pif was Logged Only for the following reasons: Scan Engine Failure (0x80004005)

Norton AntiVirus failed to scan an attachment in a message you sent.

2003-10-02 Thread 10AntiVirus
Recipient of the attachment: SEXCHANGE, RADIANT\RII, StellaHsieh(謝立欣)/刪除的郵件 Subject of the message: Re: That movie No action was taken on the attachment. Attachment document_9446.pif was Logged Only for the following reasons: Scan Engine Failure (0x80004005)

Norton AntiVirus failed to scan an attachment in a message you sent.

2003-09-27 Thread 10AntiVirus
Recipient of the attachment: SEXCHANGE, RADIANT\RII, StellaHsieh(謝立欣)/收件匣 Subject of the message: Re: That movie No action was taken on the attachment. Attachment document_9446.pif was Logged Only for the following reasons: Scan Engine Failure (0x80004005)

Norton AntiVirus failed to scan an attachment in a message you sent.

2003-09-05 Thread 10AntiVirus
Recipient of the attachment: SEXCHANGE, RADIANT\RII, StellaHsieh(謝立欣)/收件匣 Subject of the message: Re: That movie No action was taken on the attachment. Attachment document_9446.pif was Logged Only for the following reasons: Scan Engine Failure (0x80004005)

Norton AntiVirus failed to scan an attachment in a message you sent.

2003-09-02 Thread 10AntiVirus
Recipient of the attachment: SEXCHANGE, RADIANT\RII, StellaHsieh(謝立欣)/收件匣 Subject of the message: Re: That movie No action was taken on the attachment. Attachment document_9446.pif was Logged Only for the following reasons: Scan Engine Failure (0x80004005)

Norton AntiVirus failed to scan an attachment in a message you sent.

2003-08-22 Thread 10AntiVirus
Recipient of the attachment: SEXCHANGE, First Storage Group\Mailbox Store (SEXCHANGE), mailbackup/收件匣 Subject of the message: Re: That movie No action was taken on the attachment. Attachment document_9446.pif was Logged Only for the following reasons: Scan Engine Failure (0x80004005)

Norton AntiVirus failed to scan an attachment in a message you sent.

2003-08-22 Thread 10AntiVirus
Recipient of the attachment: SEXCHANGE, RADIANT\RII, StellaHsieh(謝立欣)/收件匣 Subject of the message: Re: That movie No action was taken on the attachment. Attachment document_9446.pif was Logged Only for the following reasons: Scan Engine Failure (0x80004005)

Norton AntiVirus failed to scan an attachment in a message you sent.

2003-08-21 Thread 10AntiVirus
Recipient of the attachment: SEXCHANGE, First Storage Group\Mailbox Store (SEXCHANGE), mailbackup/收件匣 Subject of the message: Re: That movie No action was taken on the attachment. Attachment document_9446.pif was Logged Only for the following reasons: Scan Engine Failure (0x80004005)

Norton AntiVirus failed to scan an attachment in a message you sent.

2003-08-21 Thread 10AntiVirus
Recipient of the attachment: SEXCHANGE, RADIANT\RII, StellaHsieh(謝立欣)/收件匣 Subject of the message: Re: That movie No action was taken on the attachment. Attachment document_9446.pif was Logged Only for the following reasons: Scan Engine Failure (0x80004005)

UniteU's AntiVirus scan detected a virus in a message you sent to %2

2003-08-20 Thread nortonsadmin
Recipient of the infected attachment: DC3, UniteU\Mailbox Store (DC3), Paige Obrien/Inbox Subject of the message: Re: Details One or more attachments were intercepted and deleted Attachment document_9446.pif was Deleted for the following reasons: Virus [EMAIL PROTECTED] was found.

Norton AntiVirus detected and quarantined a virus in a message yo u sent.

2003-08-20 Thread NAV for Microsoft Exchange-JUPITER1
Recipient of the infected attachment: Bradley, Leisa\Inbox Subject of the message: Re: Wicked screensaver One or more attachments were quarantined. Attachment movie0045.pif was Quarantined for the following reasons: Virus [EMAIL PROTECTED] was found. <>

Symantec AVF detected that you sent a message with a prohibited attachment name

2003-08-19 Thread Robert.Elliott
Subject of the message: Re: Thank you! Recipient of the message: Robyn Elliott Prohibited attachment: document_all.pif

Norton AntiVirus detected and quarantined a virus in a message you sent.

2003-06-29 Thread NAV for Microsoft Exchange-IVAEXMS
Recipient of the infected attachment: Byers, Matthew E\Inbox Subject of the message: Re: Application One or more attachments were quarantined. Attachment your_details.zip was Quarantined for the following reasons: Virus UNAUTHORIZED FILE was found. <>

Norton AntiVirus detected a virus in a message you sent. The inf ected attachment was deleted.

2002-11-23 Thread NAV for Microsoft Exchange-TB_EXCH1
Recipient of the infected attachment: info\Inbox Subject of the message: Meeting notice One or more attachments were deleted Attachment All.exe was Deleted for the following reasons: Virus [EMAIL PROTECTED] was found. <>

Send You A Message

2001-04-28 Thread Posh
Dear Sir/Madam, We feel great honor to send you this message. This is a commerical message, if it has disturbed you, please let me know and we will erase your address from my list. We,Posh Computer Co.Ltd,located in Foshan Guangdong China,is a company who professionally produce all kinds o

Re: CVS and sending a message when a file is updated (Was: NEWS for debian-boot

1999-01-24 Thread Steve McIntyre
Stephane Bortzmeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >For Steve, the simplest solution is probably to subscribe to debian-boot >(which receives the CVS updates) and to use procmail to filter: Thanks. I've been subscribed to debian-boot for a new days now, so I'm seeing things going through. -- Ste

A message

1998-05-07 Thread Jason Gunthorpe
sorry about this, A test email. #1. Jason -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]