Re: 50.000 binary packages

2016-02-13 Thread Paul Wise
On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 8:40 PM, Enrico Zini wrote: > On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 04:02:46PM +1100, Paul Wise wrote: >> Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2016 16:02:46 +1100 >> > (script attached) >> Should that go here? >> https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/collab-maint/debian-fun.git > > Feel free. Seems it got put el

Re: 50.000 binary packages

2016-02-13 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 08/02/16 at 21:53 +1100, Stuart Prescott wrote: > > An impressive achievement indeed. > > I started collecting some data on source packages vs time a few years ago. > It also shows some of the rhythm of the development cycle: > > http://ircbots.debian.net/stats/ You could use snapsho

Re: 50.000 binary packages

2016-02-12 Thread Enrico Zini
On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 04:02:46PM +1100, Paul Wise wrote: > Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2016 16:02:46 +1100 > > plee-the-bear > > 2D platform game > > program for gridfitting, or "hinting," TrueType fonts > > free AdLib sound library (utils) > > (script attached) > Should that go here? > https:

Re: 50.000 binary packages

2016-02-11 Thread Paul Wise
On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 9:25 PM, Enrico Zini wrote: > On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 12:01:41PM +0200, Lars Wirzenius wrote: > >> Possibly someone should set up an online quiz thing, where you're >> shown a package name, its short description, and three randomly chosen >> short descriptions, and have to gu

Re: 50.000 binary packages

2016-02-10 Thread Debian/GNU
On 2016-02-10 14:19, Thomas Goirand wrote: > There's an RC bug... :P > > # ./pkgquiz > Collecting package information... that's because you are in cheat mode. try playing with "--hard". ghsdt IOhannes

Re: 50.000 binary packages

2016-02-10 Thread Enrico Zini
On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 09:19:11PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote: > There's an RC bug... :P Fixed. For the record, it grew even more: $ ./pkgquiz --help usage: pkgquiz [-h] [-i] [-a] [--hard] optional arguments: -h, --help show this help message and exit -i, --installed only quiz insta

Re: 50.000 binary packages

2016-02-10 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 02/09/2016 05:06 PM, Enrico Zini wrote: > On Tue, Feb 09, 2016 at 07:04:11AM +1100, Riley Baird wrote: > Possibly someone should set up an online quiz thing, where you're shown a package name, its short description, and three randomly chosen short descriptions, and have to guess

Re: 50.000 binary packages

2016-02-09 Thread Enrico Zini
On Tue, Feb 09, 2016 at 07:04:11AM +1100, Riley Baird wrote: > > > Possibly someone should set up an online quiz thing, where you're > > > shown a package name, its short description, and three randomly chosen > > > short descriptions, and have to guess which short description is > > > correct. [.

Re: 50.000 binary packages

2016-02-08 Thread Riley Baird
On Mon, 8 Feb 2016 11:25:00 +0100 Enrico Zini wrote: > On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 12:01:41PM +0200, Lars Wirzenius wrote: > > > Possibly someone should set up an online quiz thing, where you're > > shown a package name, its short description, and three randomly chosen > > short descriptions, and ha

Re: 50.000 binary packages

2016-02-08 Thread Stuart Prescott
An impressive achievement indeed. I started collecting some data on source packages vs time a few years ago. It also shows some of the rhythm of the development cycle: http://ircbots.debian.net/stats/ cheers Stuart -- Stuart Prescotthttp://www.nanonanonano.net/ stu...@nanonano

Re: 50.000 binary packages

2016-02-08 Thread Hans
Hi, is there a significant differernce of numbers between amd64 and i386? Hans

Re: 50.000 binary packages

2016-02-08 Thread Enrico Zini
On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 12:01:41PM +0200, Lars Wirzenius wrote: > Possibly someone should set up an online quiz thing, where you're > shown a package name, its short description, and three randomly chosen > short descriptions, and have to guess which short description is > correct. plee-the-bear

Re: 50.000 binary packages

2016-02-08 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi, just as an additional data point: we have 23658 source packages in unstable/main atm, so that's a bit less than 3 source packages per day since Debian exists :-) cheers, Holger signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: 50.000 binary packages

2016-02-08 Thread Lars Wirzenius
On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 10:53:26AM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote: > So 50k not yet :-) I remember when Christoph Lameter wrote the first packaging helper, and the number of packages skyrocketed. If I remember the numbers correctly, the package count went from 200 to 400 in a matter of a small number

Re: 50.000 binary packages

2016-02-08 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi, On Montag, 8. Februar 2016, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Well, check a mirror? > > kibi@coccia:~$ xzgrep -c ^Package: > /srv/ftp.debian.org/mirror/dists/sid/main/binary-amd64/Packages.xz 50045 holger@coccia:~$ xzgrep ^Package: /srv/ftp.debian.org/mirror/dists/sid/main/binary-amd64/Packages.xz |

Re: 50.000 binary packages

2016-02-08 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Holger Levsen (2016-02-08): > Hi Ralf, > > On Montag, 8. Februar 2016, Ralf Treinen wrote: > > $ grep -c '^Package: ' XXX_debian_dists_sid_main_binary-amd64_Packages > > 50007 > > https://piuparts.debian.org/sid/ still says 49854 binary packages in > sid/main/binary-amd64 so I'm wondering which

Re: 50.000 binary packages

2016-02-08 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi Ralf, On Montag, 8. Februar 2016, Ralf Treinen wrote: > $ grep -c '^Package: ' XXX_debian_dists_sid_main_binary-amd64_Packages > 50007 https://piuparts.debian.org/sid/ still says 49854 binary packages in sid/main/binary-amd64 so I'm wondering which statistic is wrong :-) cheers, Hol

50.000 binary packages

2016-02-07 Thread Ralf Treinen
Hi, seen this morning: $ grep -c '^Package: ' XXX_debian_dists_sid_main_binary-amd64_Packages 50007 -Ralf