> > Package: zsh (debian/main).
> > Maintainer: Clint Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > 58941 core dump with function mycd() {builtin cd "$@" && echo $PWD}
> > [STRATEGY] Fixed in the next .deb. Already fixed upstream. (Mar15MH)
>
> That is a week ago, has it been fixed since then?
My apologies.
25.03.2000 pisze Ethan Benson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> i don't know what it has to do with inetd, IIRC all it did was manage
> /etc/rc?.d/* symlinks.
It means I should never write any e-mails on Saturday morning [and/or
_read_ the e-mails I answer].
regards,
Jubal
--
[ Miros/law L Baran, baran-a
On Sat, Mar 25, 2000 at 08:14:21PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 25, 2000 at 09:37:38AM +0100, Miros/law `Jubal' Baran wrote:
> > 25.03.2000 pisze Anthony Towns (aj@azure.humbug.org.au):
> > > [0] update-inetd needs a rewrite. It also needs to remain more or less
> > > compatible. I
On Sat, Mar 25, 2000 at 09:37:38AM +0100, Miros/law `Jubal' Baran wrote:
> 25.03.2000 pisze Anthony Towns (aj@azure.humbug.org.au):
> > [0] update-inetd needs a rewrite. It also needs to remain more or less
> > compatible. It also needs to end up being very tidy and flexible.
> > I'll end u
Le Fri, Mar 24, 2000 at 11:24:23PM +, Alan Clucas écrivait:
> Ok then... I won't do anything.
>
> Better subscribe to debian-qa as well then. One day I'll find something
> useful to do :(
Don't be so sad. :) There's plenty of useful things to do :
- work on the other RCB (send patches whereev
25.03.2000 pisze Anthony Towns (aj@azure.humbug.org.au):
> [0] update-inetd needs a rewrite. It also needs to remain more or less
> compatible. It also needs to end up being very tidy and flexible.
> I'll end up working on this eventually, if no one else does, but if
> someone else it
On Fri, Mar 24, 2000 at 11:24:23PM +, Alan Clucas wrote:
> Ok then... I won't do anything.
>
> Better subscribe to debian-qa as well then. One day I'll find something
> useful to do :(
You're quite welcome to go through the netbase bugs, and send in patches.
I've got a major redesign of a fun
On Fri, 24 Mar 2000, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Le Thu, Mar 23, 2000 at 05:10:13PM -0500, Ben Collins écrivait:
> > This late in the game, you need to backport the fixes to the version in
> > potato. Make a diff of the changes against the current debian source, get
> > it checked over by some knowle
Le Thu, Mar 23, 2000 at 05:10:13PM -0500, Ben Collins écrivait:
> This late in the game, you need to backport the fixes to the version in
> potato. Make a diff of the changes against the current debian source, get
> it checked over by some knowledgable folks, and then have at it.
I think this is q
> > > Package: fetchmail (debian/main).
> > > Maintainer: Paul Haggart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > [HELP] This package needs a new maintainer. (RB)
> > > 43139 fetchmail flushed after failed delivery
> > > 50990 fetchmail: mail was fetched and deleted from server but never
> > > sent to local M
On Thu, Mar 23, 2000 at 08:44:26PM +, Alan Clucas wrote:
> My first debian post :)
>
> > The packages involved are fetchmail, g++, gpm, kernel-image-2.2.14-ide
> > (do we really need it? I assumed it's needed for the bootfloppies),
> > and perl-5.005.
>
> > Package: fetchmail (debian/main).
My first debian post :)
> The packages involved are fetchmail, g++, gpm, kernel-image-2.2.14-ide
> (do we really need it? I assumed it's needed for the bootfloppies),
> and perl-5.005.
> Package: fetchmail (debian/main).
> Maintainer: Paul Haggart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> [HELP] This package needs
On Wed, Mar 22, 2000 at 11:09:01AM +0100, Igor Mozetic wrote:
>
> Richard Braakman writes:
>
> > The packages involved are fetchmail, g++, gpm, kernel-image-2.2.14-ide
> > (do we really need it? I assumed it's needed for the bootfloppies),
>
> Kernel 2.2.14 is severly broken (OOM problems). W
On Wed, Mar 22, 2000 at 03:51:48PM +0100, Richard Braakman wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 22, 2000 at 12:50:19PM +0100, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> > > Package: netbase (debian/main).
> > > Maintainer: Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > 59282 netbase: portmap is killed too early on shutdown
> > Hasn't t
On Wed, Mar 22, 2000 at 08:43:08AM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> > > Package: cvs (debian/main).
> > > Maintainer: Tom Lees <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > 59543 cvs: cvs-makerepos does not exist
> >
> > Isn't this just "cvs init"?
>
> I think this is supposed to be a script that creates the repos that
On 22-Mar-00, 05:50 (CST), Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Previously Richard Braakman wrote:
> > Package: cvs (debian/main).
> > Maintainer: Tom Lees <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > 59543 cvs: cvs-makerepos does not exist
>
> Isn't this just "cvs init"?
>
> > 59909 cvs: cvs segfaults
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Richard Braakman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Package: hostname (debian/main).
>Maintainer: Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 59410 hostname: found how to set domainname for linux
That is not a bug at all - I've mailed an explanation to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and set the
On Wed, Mar 22, 2000 at 10:50:03 +0100, Richard Braakman wrote:
> The packages involved are fetchmail, g++, gpm, kernel-image-2.2.14-ide
> (do we really need it? I assumed it's needed for the bootfloppies),
> and perl-5.005.
> Package: g++ (debian/main).
> Maintainer: Debian GCC maintainers <[EMA
On Wed, Mar 22, 2000 at 12:50:19PM +0100, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> Previously Richard Braakman wrote:
> > Maintainer: Martin Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > 59592 grmonitor needs to depends on libgl1 instead of mesag3
>
> Is this release-critical? Not sure. It's only a recompile btw.
>
> > Pa
On Wed, Mar 22, 2000 at 12:50:19PM +0100, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> Previously Richard Braakman wrote:
> > Package: autofs (debian/main).
> > Maintainer: Justin Maurer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > 52132 autofs: Race condition when expiring autofs submounts leaves daemon
> > crippled
> > [STRATEGY] Pa
On Wed, Mar 22, 2000 at 07:54:54AM -0500, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> > Package: rep-gtk (debian/main).
> > Maintainer: Mikolaj J. Habryn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > 58684 rep-gtk_0.8-2(unstable): build error (prototype mismatch)
>
> This appears to be an upstream problem specific to that version, whi
> > Package: cvs (debian/main).
> > Maintainer: Tom Lees <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > 59543 cvs: cvs-makerepos does not exist
>
> Isn't this just "cvs init"?
I think this is supposed to be a script that creates the repos that you
listed in the configuration (debconf). Doesn't appear to eexitist even
On Wed, Mar 22, 2000 at 12:50:19PM +0100 , Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> Previously Richard Braakman wrote:
> > Package: debianutils (debian/main).
> > Maintainer: Guy Maor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > 59121 run-parts hangs during /etc/cron.daily runs
>
> This is a nasty one..
Hmm. Why not go with the p
Previously Richard Braakman wrote:
> Package: autofs (debian/main).
> Maintainer: Justin Maurer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 52132 autofs: Race condition when expiring autofs submounts leaves daemon
> crippled
> [STRATEGY] Patch available, waiting for reply from upstream
We should probably go with the
On Wed, Mar 22, 2000 at 10:50:03AM +0100, Richard Braakman was heard to say:
[snip]
> 59909 cvs: cvs segfaults when commiting a dir
FWIW, I've never seen this bug.
> Package: rep-gtk (debian/main).
> Maintainer: Mikolaj J. Habryn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 58684 rep-gtk_0.8-2(unstable): build er
Richard Braakman writes:
> The packages involved are fetchmail, g++, gpm, kernel-image-2.2.14-ide
> (do we really need it? I assumed it's needed for the bootfloppies),
Kernel 2.2.14 is severly broken (OOM problems). We had crashes and
killings of essential processes on several machines.
I adv
26 matches
Mail list logo
