Re: 3rd party modules in the archive

2006-03-17 Thread Bastian Blank
On Thu, Mar 16, 2006 at 08:38:30PM +0100, Eduard Bloch wrote: > > > However, I have been told that it is no > > > longer allowed to upload binary packages that do not appear in control > > > files of the source package that are claimed to be the source of the > > > uplo

Re: 3rd party modules in the archive

2006-03-16 Thread Eduard Bloch
#include * Bastian Blank [Thu, Mar 16 2006, 07:19:22PM]: > On Thu, Mar 16, 2006 at 03:51:05PM +0100, Eduard Bloch wrote: > > WTF has this to do with Sven now? > > Maybe because Sven and I worked on a solution for this problem. Hoookay... > > However, I have been tol

Re: 3rd party modules in the archive

2006-03-16 Thread Bastian Blank
On Thu, Mar 16, 2006 at 03:51:05PM +0100, Eduard Bloch wrote: > WTF has this to do with Sven now? Maybe because Sven and I worked on a solution for this problem. > However, I have been told that it is no > longer allowed to upload binary packages that do not appear in

3rd party modules in the archive

2006-03-16 Thread Eduard Bloch
#include * Andres Salomon [Wed, Mar 15 2006, 02:45:42PM]: > On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 07:20:20PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote: > > also sprach Gustavo Franco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.03.15.1512 +0100]: > For starters, I/we need to figure out a sane way to deal w/ 3rd party kernel > modules. I'm n