On 9/17/06, Hendrik Sattler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
A good hint for such cases is to actually report such bugs to the driver
developers. Did you?
You must have pretty uncommon hardware, though, as many use 2.6 kernels
without such problems...
I have an old server with 2.4 because 2.6 won't
Hendrik Sattler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A good hint for such cases is to actually report such bugs to the driver
> developers. Did you?
It's still in my reproduction and analysis-queue. However, 2.6 is not
my biggest priority atm (it will still take a while to get it stable
anyways :)).
> Y
Am Sonntag 17 September 2006 12:28 schrieb Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe:
> However, as long
> as I can easily freeze my machine just by doing really simple disk-I/O
> tasks (which just happened when I had a need to boot into a Knoppix),
> I will definitely not consider it to run on my servers.
A good h
Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> Well, if there are really packages that demand on 2.6, they just can
> depend on kernel-image-2.6, this is no problem at all.
[...]
No, they cannot. Kernel version requirements cannot be expressed in
package dependencies because
a) You can
Marco d'Itri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The problem with supporting old kernels is not just the need to maintain
2.4 is not old, it's just stable :)
> a few packages like initrd-tools or modutils, but that every important
> package cannot rely on features of modern kernels: inotify, sysfs, etc.
5 matches
Mail list logo
