On Wed, Mar 29, 2000 at 03:05:26PM +1000, Brian May wrote:
> How do you say "this bug is important enough to be fixed for frozen"?
>
> Often, for instance, there are times when a really simple bug causes a
> package to break seriously for some users. While the package should
> not get dropped if i
Sorry, simple reply for the sake of testing out poor mail server.
Ben
> "Richard" == Richard Braakman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Richard> On Tue, Mar 28, 2000 at 10:03:33AM +1000, Brian May
Richard> wrote:
>> I set the severity to important, as I feel that bbdb support is
>> important for gnus, and also, because I think it should be easy
>>
On Mon, Mar 27, 2000 at 05:38:54PM +0200, Richard Braakman wrote:
> This is the current list of bugs that are headed for the horizon.
> I generated it from the bugscan report of Mar 26 15:08, and subtracted
> the bugs that were fixed by uploads I installed today.
>
> I will start removing these pa
On Tue, Mar 28, 2000 at 10:03:33AM +1000, Brian May wrote:
> I set the severity to important, as I feel that bbdb support is
> important for gnus, and also, because I think it should be easy to fix
> (if you know what you are doing --- I don't).
[...]
> I don't think it is worth dropping the packag
On Mon, Mar 27, 2000 at 05:38:54PM +0200, Richard Braakman wrote:
> Package: epic4 (debian/main).
> Maintainer: Joseph Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 58508 Epic pre2.503 has bugs which 2.505 has not
The bugs mentioned in this report do not affect everybody. 505 fixed a
few bugs sure, but it creat
> On 28 Mar 2000 05:13:39 +0200
> "Fred" == Frederic Lepied <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote...
Fred> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Takuo KITAME) writes:
> On 27 Mar 2000 15:11:17 -0500
> "CW" == Colin Walters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote...
>>
> Package: bbdb (debian/main).
> Maintainer: Frederic Lepied <[E
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Takuo KITAME) writes:
> > On 27 Mar 2000 15:11:17 -0500
> > "CW" == Colin Walters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote...
>
> >> Package: bbdb (debian/main).
> >> Maintainer: Frederic Lepied <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> 59177 xemacs20 didn't compile bbdb-gnus on installation
>
> CW>
> On 27 Mar 2000 15:11:17 -0500
> "CW" == Colin Walters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote...
>> Package: bbdb (debian/main).
>> Maintainer: Frederic Lepied <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> 59177 xemacs20 didn't compile bbdb-gnus on installation
CW> Instead of removing this package, couldn't we just change
> "Richard" == Richard Braakman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Richard> On Mon, Mar 27, 2000 at 11:55:49AM -0600, Manoj
Richard> Srivastava wrote:
>> This should not be a RC bug: bbdb works just fine for
>> emacs19/20, and even the basic package continues to work for
>> XEmacs
Richard Braakman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Mar 27, 2000 at 11:55:49AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> > This should not be a RC bug: bbdb works just fine for
> > emacs19/20, and even the basic package continues to work for XEmacs
> > (for VM users, for example). Only the int
Le Mon, Mar 27, 2000 at 07:14:57PM +0200, Christian Hammers écrivait:
> > Package: fetchmailconf (debian/main).
> > Maintainer: Paul Haggart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > 57287 generates wrong config files
> > [ Removing fetchmailconf means also removing fetchmail, unless someone
> > uploads a fetch
> Package: bbdb (debian/main).
> Maintainer: Frederic Lepied <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 59177 xemacs20 didn't compile bbdb-gnus on installation
Instead of removing this package, couldn't we just change the Depends:
to emacs20 | xemacs21 ?
--
Colin Walters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://web.verbum.org/l
> Package: debianutils (debian/main).
> Maintainer: Guy Maor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 59121 run-parts hangs during /etc/cron.daily runs
There's a patch in the BTS. Does someone want to do an NMU or should I?
Julian
--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >>"Richard" == Richard Braakman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Richard> Package: bbdb (debian/main).
> Richard> Maintainer: Frederic Lepied <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Richard> 59177 xemacs20 didn't compile bbdb-gnus on installation
>
> This
On Mon, Mar 27, 2000 at 11:55:49AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> This should not be a RC bug: bbdb works just fine for
> emacs19/20, and even the basic package continues to work for XEmacs
> (for VM users, for example). Only the interface between bbdb and gnus
> in _one_ of the flavou
>>"Richard" == Richard Braakman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Richard> Package: bbdb (debian/main).
Richard> Maintainer: Frederic Lepied <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Richard> 59177 xemacs20 didn't compile bbdb-gnus on installation
This should not be a RC bug: bbdb works just fine for
emacs19/2
Richard Braakman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Package: bbdb (debian/main).
> Maintainer: Frederic Lepied <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 59177 xemacs20 didn't compile bbdb-gnus on installation
I have spent the last 3 hours attempting to reproduce this with no
success. I have tried it both with and with
> Package: fetchmailconf (debian/main).
> Maintainer: Paul Haggart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 57287 generates wrong config files
> [ Removing fetchmailconf means also removing fetchmail, unless someone
> uploads a fetchmail version that does not create a fetchmailconf package ]
I fixed this one! I
On Mon, Mar 27, 2000 at 05:35:30PM +0100, Enrique Zanardi wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 27, 2000 at 05:38:54PM +0200, Richard Braakman wrote:
> > This is the current list of bugs that are headed for the horizon.
> > I generated it from the bugscan report of Mar 26 15:08, and subtracted
> > the bugs that wer
On Mon, Mar 27, 2000 at 05:38:54PM +0200, Richard Braakman wrote:
> This is the current list of bugs that are headed for the horizon.
> I generated it from the bugscan report of Mar 26 15:08, and subtracted
> the bugs that were fixed by uploads I installed today.
>
> I will start removing these pa
21 matches
Mail list logo
