Re: ../dists/slink/main/binary-i386/Packages is empty

1998-05-08 Thread Johnie Ingram
"Douglas" == Douglas Bates <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Douglas> To follow up on my own post - this was reported as bug Douglas> #21025. In the bug report the date on the file was Apr 2. Douglas> Now it is Apr 24 but it is still zero length. In case I haven't mentioned it enough, the Packages fi

Re: ../dists/slink/main/binary-i386/Packages is empty

1998-05-08 Thread Douglas Bates
Douglas Bates <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I notice that the Packages file for slink/main/binary-i386 on master > is empty ... To follow up on my own post - this was reported as bug #21025. In the bug report the date on the file was Apr 2. Now it is Apr 24 but it is still zero length. -- To

../dists/slink/main/binary-i386/Packages is empty

1998-05-04 Thread Douglas Bates
Sorry if this has already been discussed but I have been away for a week and off the list. I notice that the Packages file for slink/main/binary-i386 is empty whereas binary-alpha, binary-powerpc, and binary-sparc all look as I would expect them to. Is this a subtle hint that I should switch arch