On Tue, Oct 05, 1999 at 04:36:58PM +1300, Michael Beattie wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Oct 1999, Joey Hess wrote:
>
> > Thomas Schoepf wrote:
> > > Have you tried Ben's getbugs.pl? Is it good enough?
> >
> > I looked at it briefly, but it seemsed very slow. wget is easier.
>
> I get:
>
> Error: IO::Socke
On Mon, 4 Oct 1999, Joey Hess wrote:
> Thomas Schoepf wrote:
> > Have you tried Ben's getbugs.pl? Is it good enough?
>
> I looked at it briefly, but it seemsed very slow. wget is easier.
I get:
Error: IO::Socket::INET: Connection refused
(use --help for usage)
... any comments? Ben? (I am most
Thomas Schoepf wrote:
> Have you tried Ben's getbugs.pl? Is it good enough?
I looked at it briefly, but it seemsed very slow. wget is easier.
--
see shy jo
On Mon, Oct 04, 1999 at 09:29:58AM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> > This needs a direct connection, right? I'm behind a firewall :(
>
> I'm using it behind a firewall, not sure how yours is configured.
It's not really a firewall: there's no default route, http and ftp (over http)
work via squid.
T
On Sun, Oct 03, 1999 at 05:35:11PM -0700, Joey Hess wrote:
> Thomas Schoepf wrote:
> > this is a perl script I've written, because I was fed up with manually
> > fetching bug reports and storing them into a directory structure so that
> > browsing still works. Now,
On Mon, Oct 04, 1999 at 12:08:13PM +0200, Thomas Schoepf wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 03, 1999 at 09:13:56PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
>
> > On the same subject I invite everyone to test out "getbugs" which is at
> > http://www.debian.org/~bcollins/getbugs.pl. It's a Net::LDAP script that
>
> This needs
On Sun, Oct 03, 1999 at 09:13:56PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> On the same subject I invite everyone to test out "getbugs" which is at
> http://www.debian.org/~bcollins/getbugs.pl. It's a Net::LDAP script that
This needs a direct connection, right? I'm behind a firewall :(
Thomas
--
GnuPG: ID=B
On Sun, Oct 03, 1999 at 05:35:11PM -0700, Joey Hess wrote:
> Thomas Schoepf wrote:
> > this is a perl script I've written, because I was fed up with manually
> > fetching bug reports and storing them into a directory structure so that
> > browsing still works. Now,
Thomas Schoepf wrote:
> this is a perl script I've written, because I was fed up with manually
> fetching bug reports and storing them into a directory structure so that
> browsing still works. Now, when I type 'buglist -r -d ~/debian/Bugs less',
> all reports rega
Hi,
this is a perl script I've written, because I was fed up with manually
fetching bug reports and storing them into a directory structure so that
browsing still works. Now, when I type 'buglist -r -d ~/debian/Bugs less',
all reports regarding 'less' are saved into ~/d
rt stuff there. It saves me from
having to keep a separate list of "private" bugs, and while it may
not be a "pole of shame", if the list gets long, it tends to inspire
some effort to reduce it to something a little less personally
embarrasing :-).
One enhancement I would like to se
Sven Rudolph writes ("Re: Buglist"):
> Some suggestions for the bug reporting system:
> - It is possible to mark a message quiet in order to get it not echoed
> at debian-devel. Is there a way to make answers to it be not echoed
> too ? (e.g. by introducing a d
On Thu, 21 Dec 1995, Bruce Perens wrote:
> I have a bunch of bugs I haven't closed out, and there are bugs
> on packages I've transferred to other maintainers that the other
> maintainers have not closed out. I will not be able to deal with
> this until after New Years.
I, too, have some work to
I have a bunch of bugs I haven't closed out, and there are bugs on
packages I've transferred to other maintainers that the other maintainers
have not closed out. I will not be able to deal with this until after
New Years.
Thanks
Bruce
--
Bruce Perens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Pixar Anim
ight, not having anything sensible, like sleeping, to do,
> I was browsing thru the BugList.
> It appears that there is a number of Bugs reported which are really
> no longer valid, they point to old Debian (0.95) or maybe to a really
> old application package which has been replaced lo
15 matches
Mail list logo