On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 12:47:34PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> But what worries me more is that you AGAIN ignored
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=652681.
I was working off a rebuild of SID. Perhaps my last message didn't
clearly state that. So all the bugs reported were f
On 28/12/11 at 13:50 +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Steve M. Robbins sumost.ca> writes:
>
> > OK, with thanks to Lucas Nussbaum for the build results, I can report
> > that only the following 23 of 237 boost rdep packages failed to build
> > with boost-defaults pointing to 1.48. This shouldn't
Steve M. Robbins sumost.ca> writes:
> OK, with thanks to Lucas Nussbaum for the build results, I can report
> that only the following 23 of 237 boost rdep packages failed to build
> with boost-defaults pointing to 1.48. This shouldn't take a lot of
Hrm, I don’t see aptitude in there, but get th
Hi,
> I'm bcc'ing this email to maintainers of the list of packages, below.
> Each of you, I'd appreciate it if you could check with the upstream
> authors whether a fix is already available. Please send an update
> to the appropriate bug with the upstream response or mark the bug
> forwarded to
On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 11:20:16AM -0600, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 04:45:21PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > On 26/12/11 at 22:40 -0600, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
>
> > > It would be quite helpful to do a rebuild of the 237 boost reverse
> > > dependencies. Lucas Nussbaum
5 matches
Mail list logo
