Re: [kde] and, for my next trick ...

2002-01-12 Thread Daniel Stone
On Sun, Jan 13, 2002 at 12:29:34AM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > On Sun, Jan 13, 2002 at 12:00:30AM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote: > > I'll stop posting to -devel when you come up with the guideline that > > says "don't post important stuff about one of the two major desktop > > environments breaking

Re: [kde] and, for my next trick ...

2002-01-12 Thread Torsten Landschoff
On Sun, Jan 13, 2002 at 12:00:30AM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote: > I'll stop posting to -devel when you come up with the guideline that > says "don't post important stuff about one of the two major desktop > environments breaking hardcore". Gladly. > > It was an important issue that affected many.

Re: [kde] and, for my next trick ...

2002-01-12 Thread Hamish Moffatt
On Sun, Jan 13, 2002 at 12:00:30AM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote: > I'll stop posting to -devel when you come up with the guideline that > says "don't post important stuff about one of the two major desktop > environments breaking hardcore". Gladly. > > It was an important issue that affected many. N

Re: [kde] and, for my next trick ...

2002-01-12 Thread Daniel Stone
On Sat, Jan 12, 2002 at 01:13:53PM +0100, Peter Makholm wrote: > Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Oh, there *appears* to be one? You mean the one I sent this message to, > > and the one that I'm subscribed to? Right! Thanks for the information! I > > sent it to -devel because not all

Re: [kde] and, for my next trick ...

2002-01-12 Thread Peter Makholm
Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Oh, there *appears* to be one? You mean the one I sent this message to, > and the one that I'm subscribed to? Right! Thanks for the information! I > sent it to -devel because not all KDE users are subscribed to -devel. And since when has users generally

Re: [kde] and, for my next trick ...

2002-01-11 Thread Daniel Stone
iel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: debian-kde@lists.debian.org Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org Subject: [kde] and, for my next trick ... Oh, there *appears* to be one? You mean the one I sent this message to, and the one that I'm subscribed to? Right! Thanks for the information! I sent

Re: [kde] and, for my next trick ...

2002-01-11 Thread Aaron Lehmann
There appears to be a list named debian-kde. PLEASE use that. -devel is already clogged enough, and should be reserved for extremely general or miscellaneous discussion.

Re: [kde] and, for my next trick ...

2002-01-10 Thread Ben Burton
> The libpng[23] screwup in unstable is now more or less resolved with > kde{base,graphics,network} in incoming. Now, the only packages that need > rebuilding are kdeaddons, kinkatta, kmerlin, koffice, and maybe kdetoys > (not sure on that one - Ben?). kdelibs was installed last night. I don't be

Re: [kde] and, for my next trick ...

2002-01-10 Thread Daniel Stone
On Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 10:19:52AM +0100, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote: > On Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 05:17:08PM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote: > > The libpng[23] screwup in unstable is now more or less resolved with > > kde{base,graphics,network} in incoming. Now, the only packages that need > > rebuildin

Re: [kde] and, for my next trick ...

2002-01-10 Thread Francesco P. Lovergine
On Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 05:17:08PM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote: > The libpng[23] screwup in unstable is now more or less resolved with > kde{base,graphics,network} in incoming. Now, the only packages that need > rebuilding are kdeaddons, kinkatta, kmerlin, koffice, and maybe kdetoys > (not sure on th

[kde] and, for my next trick ...

2002-01-10 Thread Daniel Stone
The libpng[23] screwup in unstable is now more or less resolved with kde{base,graphics,network} in incoming. Now, the only packages that need rebuilding are kdeaddons, kinkatta, kmerlin, koffice, and maybe kdetoys (not sure on that one - Ben?). kdelibs was installed last night. Thanks muchly to ca