Re: [frankie@debian.org: Status of kernel-patches in sarge]

2005-05-30 Thread Francesco Paolo Lovergine
On Mon, May 30, 2005 at 12:19:11PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > I'd expect maintainers drop patches which are orphaned by the upstream > > or whose maintainance would be a problem... > > The number of patches that do not apply shown in the initial message of > this thread shows that your expect

Re: [frankie@debian.org: Status of kernel-patches in sarge]

2005-05-30 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Sun, May 22, 2005 at 10:02:06PM +0200, Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote: > On Sun, May 22, 2005 at 12:35:59AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > On Sat, May 21, 2005 at 10:04:02AM +0200, Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote: > > > > > The check shown below is almost complete (but for a couple of 2.2 patch

Re: [frankie@debian.org: Status of kernel-patches in sarge]

2005-05-22 Thread Francesco Paolo Lovergine
On Sun, May 22, 2005 at 12:35:59AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Sat, May 21, 2005 at 10:04:02AM +0200, Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote: > > > The check shown below is almost complete (but for a couple of 2.2 patches > > and per-arch patches). > > I'm asking if mass bug report filing is opportune

Re: [frankie@debian.org: Status of kernel-patches in sarge]

2005-05-22 Thread Francesco Paolo Lovergine
On Sun, May 22, 2005 at 12:40:26AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Sat, May 21, 2005 at 10:04:02AM +0200, Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote: > > The check shown below is almost complete (but for a couple of 2.2 patches > > and per-arch patches). > > I'm asking if mass bug report filing is opportune

Re: [frankie@debian.org: Status of kernel-patches in sarge]

2005-05-22 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sat, May 21, 2005 at 10:04:02AM +0200, Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote: > The check shown below is almost complete (but for a couple of 2.2 patches > and per-arch patches). > I'm asking if mass bug report filing is opportune at this stage. > IMHO patches which cannot be applied to debian kernel-

Re: [frankie@debian.org: Status of kernel-patches in sarge]

2005-05-21 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Sat, May 21, 2005 at 10:04:02AM +0200, Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote: > The check shown below is almost complete (but for a couple of 2.2 patches > and per-arch patches). > I'm asking if mass bug report filing is opportune at this stage. > IMHO patches which cannot be applied to debian kernel

Re: [frankie@debian.org: Status of kernel-patches in sarge]

2005-05-21 Thread Bill Allombert
On Sat, May 21, 2005 at 10:04:02AM +0200, Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote: > The check shown below is almost complete (but for a couple of 2.2 patches > and per-arch patches). > I'm asking if mass bug report filing is opportune at this stage. > IMHO patches which cannot be applied to debian kernel-

[frankie@debian.org: Status of kernel-patches in sarge]

2005-05-21 Thread Francesco Paolo Lovergine
The check shown below is almost complete (but for a couple of 2.2 patches and per-arch patches). I'm asking if mass bug report filing is opportune at this stage. IMHO patches which cannot be applied to debian kernel-sources are almost unuseful and should be removed from sarge... - Forwarded m