Re: [custom] Re: Custom Debian Distributions

2003-12-02 Thread Zenaan Harkness
On Tue, 2003-12-02 at 19:14, Andreas Tille wrote: > On Tue, 2 Dec 2003, Zenaan Harkness wrote: > > Is there a single place where all official Custom Debian Distributions > > (CDDs - even a reasonable TLA), aka internal projects, are listed? > Unfortunately not yet under www.debian.org, but if the r

Re: [custom] Re: Custom Debian Distributions

2003-12-02 Thread Zenaan Harkness
On Tue, 2003-12-02 at 19:14, Andreas Tille wrote: > On Tue, 2 Dec 2003, Zenaan Harkness wrote: > > Then, it's up to the projects to start using the term. A list would I > > think be very good for making cdd discussions stand out at this point - > > there seems to be enough traffic. But perhaps I'm

Re: [custom] Re: Custom Debian Distributions

2003-12-02 Thread Andreas Tille
On Tue, 2 Dec 2003, Zenaan Harkness wrote: > Is there a single place where all official Custom Debian Distributions > (CDDs - even a reasonable TLA), aka internal projects, are listed? Unfortunately not yet under www.debian.org, but if the redirection loop to people.debian.org is solved again you

Re: [custom] Re: Custom Debian Distributions (was: Re: Integrate Knoppix in Debian (was: Re: Debian Enterprise?))

2003-12-01 Thread Zenaan Harkness
> Debian-Jr, Debian-Med, Debian-Edu, Debian-Np, Debian-Lex Is there a single place where all official Custom Debian Distributions (CDDs - even a reasonable TLA), aka internal projects, are listed? > These Custom Distributions use the technique of metapackages and have > common goals and try to de

Re: [custom] Re: Custom Debian Distributions (was: Re: Integrate Knoppix in Debian (was: Re: Debian Enterprise?))

2003-12-01 Thread Anthony Towns
On Mon, Dec 01, 2003 at 06:48:20PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > For instance we have defined a term "Package Pools" and everybody now > knows what we are talking about ... Of course, not everyone used the term "Package pools" for the same thing originally. Cheers, aj -- Anthony Towns <[EMAIL P

Re: [custom] Re: Custom Debian Distributions (was: Re: Integrate Knoppix in Debian (was: Re: Debian Enterprise?))

2003-12-01 Thread Philip Charles
On Tue, 2 Dec 2003, Anthony Towns wrote: > Since I evidently didn't, I'm going to spell things out in as much > boring detail as I can. If I don't end up insulting your intelligence, > my apologies. :) You have clarified the situation nicely. > > So, using my definitions, the following conclusio

Re: [custom] Re: Custom Debian Distributions (was: Re: Integrate Knoppix in Debian (was: Re: Debian Enterprise?))

2003-12-01 Thread Andreas Tille
On Tue, 2 Dec 2003, Anthony Towns wrote: > On Mon, Dec 01, 2003 at 10:55:36AM +0100, Enrico Zini wrote: > > Could you please define precisely "flavours" and "derivative distros"? > > Damn, I thought I'd already done that. The problem is that we want to get those "Custom Debian Distributions" which

Re: [custom] Re: Custom Debian Distributions (was: Re: Integrate Knoppix in Debian (was: Re: Debian Enterprise?))

2003-12-01 Thread Anthony Towns
On Mon, Dec 01, 2003 at 10:55:36AM +0100, Enrico Zini wrote: > Could you please define precisely "flavours" and "derivative distros"? Damn, I thought I'd already done that. Since I evidently didn't, I'm going to spell things out in as much boring detail as I can. If I don't end up insulting your

Re: [custom] Re: Custom Debian Distributions (was: Re: Integrate Knoppix in Debian (was: Re: Debian Enterprise?))

2003-12-01 Thread Anthony Towns
On Mon, Dec 01, 2003 at 12:36:37PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > This is right but under the terms we defined in Oslo also your first > example belongs to this group. The problem is that there was no > official announcement where "Custom Debian" was *defined*. These sorts of terms are generally