On Tue, 2003-12-02 at 19:14, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Dec 2003, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> > Is there a single place where all official Custom Debian Distributions
> > (CDDs - even a reasonable TLA), aka internal projects, are listed?
> Unfortunately not yet under www.debian.org, but if the r
On Tue, 2003-12-02 at 19:14, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Dec 2003, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> > Then, it's up to the projects to start using the term. A list would I
> > think be very good for making cdd discussions stand out at this point -
> > there seems to be enough traffic. But perhaps I'm
On Tue, 2 Dec 2003, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> Is there a single place where all official Custom Debian Distributions
> (CDDs - even a reasonable TLA), aka internal projects, are listed?
Unfortunately not yet under www.debian.org, but if the redirection
loop to people.debian.org is solved again you
> Debian-Jr, Debian-Med, Debian-Edu, Debian-Np, Debian-Lex
Is there a single place where all official Custom Debian Distributions
(CDDs - even a reasonable TLA), aka internal projects, are listed?
> These Custom Distributions use the technique of metapackages and have
> common goals and try to de
On Mon, Dec 01, 2003 at 06:48:20PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> For instance we have defined a term "Package Pools" and everybody now
> knows what we are talking about ...
Of course, not everyone used the term "Package pools" for the same thing
originally.
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns <[EMAIL P
On Tue, 2 Dec 2003, Anthony Towns wrote:
> Since I evidently didn't, I'm going to spell things out in as much
> boring detail as I can. If I don't end up insulting your intelligence,
> my apologies. :)
You have clarified the situation nicely.
>
> So, using my definitions, the following conclusio
On Tue, 2 Dec 2003, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 01, 2003 at 10:55:36AM +0100, Enrico Zini wrote:
> > Could you please define precisely "flavours" and "derivative distros"?
>
> Damn, I thought I'd already done that.
The problem is that we want to get those "Custom Debian Distributions"
which
On Mon, Dec 01, 2003 at 10:55:36AM +0100, Enrico Zini wrote:
> Could you please define precisely "flavours" and "derivative distros"?
Damn, I thought I'd already done that.
Since I evidently didn't, I'm going to spell things out in as much
boring detail as I can. If I don't end up insulting your
On Mon, Dec 01, 2003 at 12:36:37PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> This is right but under the terms we defined in Oslo also your first
> example belongs to this group. The problem is that there was no
> official announcement where "Custom Debian" was *defined*.
These sorts of terms are generally
9 matches
Mail list logo