Re: [SoftwareSuspend-devel] 2.1-final for 2.6.8.1

2005-03-01 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Erich Schubert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.03.01.1003 +0100]: > Hmm... I could be evil(tm) and just file an important bug against > your package. Being incompatible with usb-built-into-kernel is > certainly that severe. Breaks unrelated stuff would be even higher (it > completely trashes

Re: [SoftwareSuspend-devel] 2.1-final for 2.6.8.1

2005-03-01 Thread Erich Schubert
Hi, The users who will use software-suspend on non-laptops are even less. How many of those are going to run 2.6.8? > > The patch will not be included in Debian kernels, but will be used > > by the user to build his own kernel. Which will likely be not pure > > modular, but maybe just break swsusp

Re: [SoftwareSuspend-devel] 2.1-final for 2.6.8.1

2005-03-01 Thread martin f krafft
[CC: the ITP bug #292479 (http://bugs.debian.org/292479)] also sprach Erich Schubert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.02.28.2009 +0100]: > The patch will not be included in Debian kernels, but will be used > by the user to build his own kernel. Which will likely be not pure > modular, but maybe just brea

Re: [SoftwareSuspend-devel] 2.1-final for 2.6.8.1

2005-02-28 Thread Erich Schubert
Hi, > > SElinux is not supported by debian. the grsecurity situation isn't > > much different. > For SELinux. the kernel has the code; the archive has the user-space > tools. Believe me, I'm running SELinux on a couple of sarge boxes. Debian SELinux support is incomplete. You need a patched init,