On 18.12.21 21:57, Roger Lynn wrote:
On 18/12/2021 15:00, Michael Biebl wrote:
I'm not a user of logwatch, so I don't know, if logwatch nowadays can
handle RFC 5424 timestamps, but even if so, I think the benefits
outweigh the potential breakage. And it's easy enough for users to
create a drop-i
On 18/12/2021 15:00, Michael Biebl wrote:
I'm not a user of logwatch, so I don't know, if logwatch nowadays can
handle RFC 5424 timestamps, but even if so, I think the benefits
outweigh the potential breakage. And it's easy enough for users to
create a drop-in config snippet with
$ActionFileDefa
On Sat, 2021-12-18 at 15:58 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Am 23.11.21 um 23:53 schrieb Scott Kitterman:
> > On Tuesday, November 23, 2021 3:49:17 PM EST Simon Josefsson wrote:
> > > Michael Biebl writes:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > we are early in the bookworm release cycle, so I guess it's the
>
Am 23.11.21 um 23:53 schrieb Scott Kitterman:
On Tuesday, November 23, 2021 3:49:17 PM EST Simon Josefsson wrote:
Michael Biebl writes:
Hi,
we are early in the bookworm release cycle, so I guess it's the
perfect time to bring up this topic.
Sorry for hijacking the thread, but perhaps now is
On Tuesday, November 23, 2021 3:49:17 PM EST Simon Josefsson wrote:
> Michael Biebl writes:
> > Hi,
> >
> > we are early in the bookworm release cycle, so I guess it's the
> > perfect time to bring up this topic.
>
> Sorry for hijacking the thread, but perhaps now is a good time to stop
> using
Michael Biebl writes:
> Hi,
>
> we are early in the bookworm release cycle, so I guess it's the
> perfect time to bring up this topic.
Sorry for hijacking the thread, but perhaps now is a good time to stop
using the legacy syslog time format and use the standardized RFC 5424
format? It is the d
6 matches
Mail list logo
