* Goswin von Brederlow , 2010-09-22, 11:39:
apt-get install linux-2.6:src
where "src" is just another architecture (at least for the user
interface).
apt-get install foo:src
should then install the source and also all Build-Depends(-Indep) of the
source. Besides packages Build-Depending on sou
Matt Zagrabelny writes ("Re: [RFC] Binary packages containing the source"):
> On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 12:35 PM, Ian Jackson
> wrote:
> > No :-). Perhaps "ls" rather than "Ls" would have been more correct.
> > I'm not sure of the correct rule
On Wed, 22 Sep 2010, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Call it "source" if you like. The point was that the arch follows the
> package name.
It's interesting that this is exactly backwards from the way the BTS
does it. [Source packages are src:foopkg.]
Don Armstrong
--
[The] JK-88 [coffee] percola
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 12:35 PM, Ian Jackson
wrote:
> Brett Parker writes ("Re: [RFC] Binary packages containing the source"):
>> On 22 Sep 12:47, Ian Jackson wrote:
>> > Julien Cristau writes ("Re: [RFC] Binary packages containing the source"):
&g
Brett Parker writes ("Re: [RFC] Binary packages containing the source"):
> On 22 Sep 12:47, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > Julien Cristau writes ("Re: [RFC] Binary packages containing the source"):
> > > Why do people hate vowels so much?
> >
> > Bcs f y
Julien Cristau writes:
> On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 11:39:01 +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>
>> Going by what multiarch proposed and apt already supports that should be
>>
>> apt-get install linux-2.6:src
>>
>> where "src" is just another architecture (at least for the user
>> interface).
>>
On 22 Sep 12:47, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Julien Cristau writes ("Re: [RFC] Binary packages containing the source"):
> > Why do people hate vowels so much?
>
> Bcs f y lv thm t y cn wrt ncmprhnsbl gbbrsh mch mr ffctvly. L
Julien Cristau writes ("Re: [RFC] Binary packages containing the source"):
> Why do people hate vowels so much?
Bcs f y lv thm t y cn wrt ncmprhnsbl gbbrsh mch mr ffctvly. Ls y sv
smll mnt f typng.
Ian.
(sorry)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
w
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 11:39:01 +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Going by what multiarch proposed and apt already supports that should be
>
> apt-get install linux-2.6:src
>
> where "src" is just another architecture (at least for the user
> interface).
>
Why do people hate vowels so much?
Hector Oron writes:
> Dear developers,
>
> ABSTRACT
> How to enable in some special cases a way to allow one source
> package have multiple maintainers within Debian archive.
It might be better to say they have different flavours which should (out
of practicallity) or must be build on their ow
Josselin Mouette writes:
> Le jeudi 16 septembre 2010 à 03:08 +0200, Jakub Wilk a écrit :
>> * Hector Oron , 2010-09-15, 21:26:
>> > c) allow build depends on source packages, which it is probably a worst
>> > idea.
>>
>> On the contrary, I think that allowing source packages to be installab
Le 16/09/2010 09:22, Josselin Mouette a écrit :
> I agree this is a cleaner solution, but how do you ensure there are
> sources (deb-src) referenced in the sources.list ?
You don't need to. The package would be reported as uninstallable. Some
message suggesting to add deb-src lines to sources.list
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 09:22:57AM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Plus, these packages would (in the current state of affairs) lack a
> description.
On this topic, we have our friend #555743.
--
Stefano Zacchiroli -o- PhD in Computer Science \ PostDoc @ Univ. Paris 7
z...@{upsilon.cc,pps.juss
Le jeudi 16 septembre 2010 à 03:08 +0200, Jakub Wilk a écrit :
> * Hector Oron , 2010-09-15, 21:26:
> > c) allow build depends on source packages, which it is probably a worst
> > idea.
>
> On the contrary, I think that allowing source packages to be installable
> in the same way as binary pack
* Hector Oron , 2010-09-15, 21:26:
c) allow build depends on source packages, which it is probably a worst idea.
On the contrary, I think that allowing source packages to be installable
in the same way as binary packages is an excellent idea. Imagine you can
do:
apt-get install src:linux-2
Dear developers,
ABSTRACT
How to enable in some special cases a way to allow one source
package have multiple maintainers within Debian archive.
RATIONALE
There are already a number of packages in the archive which ship
sources in a binary package, in some cases this is very useful, so
withou
16 matches
Mail list logo
