On Sun, Jul 23, 2006 at 07:47:16PM +0200, Ludovic Brenta wrote:
> OK, filed #379451 (serious, because it blocks the Ada transition). I
> note however that dak has 58 outstanding bugs, the newest of which is
> 63 days old and the oldest is 4 years and 106 days old today.
Your bug has already been
On Sun, Jul 23, 2006 at 01:56:09PM -0600, LaMont Jones wrote:
> Been out for a bit - updated.
You did not do mine. Pretty please, I am begging for it. Please remove
the line concerning iroffer.
Cheers,
--
.''`. Aurélien GÉRÔME
: :' :
`. `'` Free Software Developer
`- Unix Sys & Net
On Fri, Jul 21, 2006 at 10:03:56PM +0200, Ludovic Brenta wrote:
> It has been a week since I sent the request below, and I received no
> answer. I am resending to the three maintainers of
> Packages-arch-specific, and CCing debian-devel.
Been out for a bit - updated.
lamont
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Aurélien GÉRÔME writes:
> Hi Ludovic,
>
> On Sat, Jul 22, 2006 at 06:56:06PM +0200, Ludovic Brenta wrote:
>> So, my idea of a buildd pseudo-package in the BTS was a god one after
>> all. Or, is the 'dak' package an appropriate place for such requests?
>
> An excellent one, indeed!
OK, filed #3794
Hi Ludovic,
On Sat, Jul 22, 2006 at 06:56:06PM +0200, Ludovic Brenta wrote:
> So, my idea of a buildd pseudo-package in the BTS was a god one after
> all. Or, is the 'dak' package an appropriate place for such requests?
An excellent one, indeed!
> Does anyone on this list feel like joining the
Kurt Roeckx writes:
> I've actually requested the same changes for ada.
>
> I've always been annoyed by the lack of response we get when
> sending updates for it. There are other changes I'm waiting for.
So, my idea of a buildd pseudo-package in the BTS was a god one after
all. Or, is the 'dak'
On Fri, Jul 21, 2006 at 10:03:56PM +0200, Ludovic Brenta wrote:
> It has been a week since I sent the request below, and I received no
> answer. I am resending to the three maintainers of
> Packages-arch-specific, and CCing debian-devel.
>
> I've restricted the list of supported architectures to
It has been a week since I sent the request below, and I received no
answer. I am resending to the three maintainers of
Packages-arch-specific, and CCing debian-devel.
I've restricted the list of supported architectures to those where
gnat-4.1 not only exists but also builds its shared libraries.
8 matches
Mail list logo