On Sun, May 23, 1999 at 05:01:39PM +0200, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> Previously Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> > I'm surprised by this attitude; you seem to be suggesting that others
> > should not attempt a replacement, as yours already has Wichert's blessing.
>
> Personally I wouldn't mind other similar
Previously Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> I'm surprised by this attitude; you seem to be suggesting that others
> should not attempt a replacement, as yours already has Wichert's blessing.
Personally I wouldn't mind other similar projects. I do think that
people should give this one a close look before g
On Fri, May 21, 1999 at 08:33:24AM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> I'm surprised by this attitude; you seem to be suggesting that others
> should not attempt a replacement, as yours already has Wichert's blessing.
You are completely incorrect. This is not mine, it is involves
Wichert as one of the
On Thu, May 20, 1999 at 08:47:22AM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> This was not supposed to go out until Wichert got back and some details
> were settled, but with all the talk about redoing dpkg, I felt it necessary
> so that there weren't any duplication projects started and things didn't get
> compl
On Thu, May 20, 1999 at 08:47:22AM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
[snip]
> Do not worry, everyone will have a chance to view the code in an anonymous
> CVS server (which is already setup). There will be ample documentation
> and views on the current spec will be heard. Please consider this a semi
> form
This was not supposed to go out until Wichert got back and some details
were settled, but with all the talk about redoing dpkg, I felt it necessary
so that there weren't any duplication projects started and things didn't get
complicated.
There is a project underway to build a new package manager.
6 matches
Mail list logo
