[2019-01-13 16:47] Ansgar
> Dmitry Bogatov writes:
> > [...]
> > I ask corresponding maintainers (list at bottom of email) to either
> > * move their scripts to runlevel (2 3 4 5) [preferred]
> > * remove dependency on $remote_fs, if all they need is /usr
> > * replace with dependency on `moun
Dmitry Bogatov writes:
> During resolving issue #551555 of bin:initscripts, I discovered that
> solution would be move `mountnfs.sh' initscript into runlevels (2 3 4 5).
>
> Historically, `mountnfs.sh' was present in runlevel S due the fact, that
> bin:initscripts were responsible to mounting /usr.
On Sun, Jan 13, 2019 at 01:31:42PM +, Dmitry Bogatov wrote:
> During resolving issue #551555 of bin:initscripts, I discovered that
> solution would be move `mountnfs.sh' initscript into runlevels (2 3 4 5).
[...]
> List of affected packages:
I'm not sure so close to the freeze is the right ti
Hello!
During resolving issue #551555 of bin:initscripts, I discovered that
solution would be move `mountnfs.sh' initscript into runlevels (2 3 4 5).
Historically, `mountnfs.sh' was present in runlevel S due the fact, that
bin:initscripts were responsible to mounting /usr. Nowdays, /usr is
moun
4 matches
Mail list logo
