Re: [GSoC] KDE4/Qt4 based package manager

2009-03-31 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le lundi 30 mars 2009 à 22:18 +0200, Obey Arthur Liu a écrit : > Aptitude is much more than a bare APT front-end. It embarks its own > elaborate resolver and quite a few other things. The “elaborate” resolver is precisely one of the reasons why I wouldn’t want to see it on the desktop. -- .''`.

Developing aptitude frontends (was Re: [GSoC] KDE4/Qt4 based package manager)

2009-03-30 Thread Filipus Klutiero
Obey Arthur Liu wrote: Filipus Klutiero a écrit : > Christian Perrier wrote: >> Is this silly to think that, as most of the (good) work was made in >> aptitude-gtk, an aptitude-qt development would be a better idea? > At first sight, it does sound silly to me. aptitude-gtk is a GTK+ GUI > for A

Re: [GSoC] KDE4/Qt4 based package manager

2009-03-30 Thread Sune Vuorela
On 2009-03-29, Mateusz 'Matthew' Marek wrote: > Hi, > > I would be interested in making KDE4/Qt4 based package manager. I am > 2nd year student of computer science from Poland (Gdansk University of > Technology, CET/CEST) with some experience in C/C++ and Qt programming > and git as SCM. Currently

Re: [GSoC] KDE4/Qt4 based package manager

2009-03-30 Thread Obey Arthur Liu
Filipus Klutiero a écrit : > Christian Perrier wrote: >> Is this silly to think that, as most of the (good) work was made in >> aptitude-gtk, an aptitude-qt development would be a better idea? > At first sight, it does sound silly to me. aptitude-gtk is a GTK+ GUI > for Aptitude. Similarly, aptit

Re: Re: [GSoC] KDE4/Qt4 based package manager

2009-03-30 Thread Filipus Klutiero
Christian Perrier wrote: Quoting Obey Arthur Liu (art...@milliways.fr): > > synaptic or shaman (from Chakra). I think that aptitude-gtk and adept > > are not userfriendly. Using these applications was quite difficult for > Heartfelt thank yous! (I'm the guy responsible for aptitude-gtk.. :D )

Re: [GSoC] KDE4/Qt4 based package manager

2009-03-30 Thread Michael Biebl
Obey Arthur Liu wrote: > Mateusz 'Matthew' Marek a écrit : > >> That's why I think the best way to make Qt4 based package manager is >> make it from scratch. > Are you sure you can make a graphical package manager in one summer, > from scratch ? > We believe the current best approach would be to

Re: [GSoC] KDE4/Qt4 based package manager

2009-03-30 Thread Obey Arthur Liu
Christian Perrier a écrit : > Quoting Obey Arthur Liu (art...@milliways.fr): > >>> synaptic or shaman (from Chakra). I think that aptitude-gtk and adept >>> are not userfriendly. Using these applications was quite difficult for >> Heartfelt thank yous! (I'm the guy responsible for aptitude-gtk.. :

Re: [GSoC] KDE4/Qt4 based package manager

2009-03-30 Thread Christian Perrier
Quoting Obey Arthur Liu (art...@milliways.fr): > > synaptic or shaman (from Chakra). I think that aptitude-gtk and adept > > are not userfriendly. Using these applications was quite difficult for > Heartfelt thank yous! (I'm the guy responsible for aptitude-gtk.. :D ) Is this silly to think that

Re: [GSoC] KDE4/Qt4 based package manager

2009-03-29 Thread Obey Arthur Liu
Mateusz 'Matthew' Marek a écrit : > Hi, > > I would be interested in making KDE4/Qt4 based package manager. I am Good![0] > synaptic or shaman (from Chakra). I think that aptitude-gtk and adept > are not userfriendly. Using these applications was quite difficult for Heartfelt thank yous! (I'm the

[GSoC] KDE4/Qt4 based package manager

2009-03-29 Thread Mateusz 'Matthew' Marek
Hi, I would be interested in making KDE4/Qt4 based package manager. I am 2nd year student of computer science from Poland (Gdansk University of Technology, CET/CEST) with some experience in C/C++ and Qt programming and git as SCM. Currently during my spare time I am working on light music player i