Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ban [Re: SmellyWerewolf.com perfume & make-up discount]

2008-11-25 Thread Christian Perrier
Quoting Don Armstrong ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > On Tue, 25 Nov 2008, Christian Perrier wrote: > > Has the d-d-a ban been lifted? > > There currently isn't a ban in place.[1] [EMAIL PROTECTED] will likely > be communicating privately with the individual(s) involved once we &

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ban [Re: SmellyWerewolf.com perfume & make-up discount]

2008-11-25 Thread Rafael Laboissiere
* Martin Langhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-11-25 12:12]: > On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 12:12 PM, Rafael Laboissiere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > >> 1: Thankfully, it hasn't been required yet > > > > I am confused: > > it might be a sma

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ban [Re: SmellyWerewolf.com perfume & make-up discount]

2008-11-25 Thread Joerg Jaspert
ant read or parse english. :) "I've asked" is not "I told them and they immediately did". -- bye, Joerg With a name like "TikiWiki", it seems only appropriate that if you do get co-maintainers, you should request teletubbies.alioth.debian.org. -- Steve Langasek

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ban [Re: SmellyWerewolf.com perfume & make-up discount]

2008-11-25 Thread Martin Langhoff
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 12:12 PM, Rafael Laboissiere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> 1: Thankfully, it hasn't been required yet > > I am confused: it might be a small misunderstanding. 'Required' is not the same as 'requested' in English (though they ar

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ban [Re: SmellyWerewolf.com perfume & make-up discount]

2008-11-25 Thread Rafael Laboissiere
* Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-11-25 00:21]: > On Tue, 25 Nov 2008, Christian Perrier wrote: > > Has the d-d-a ban been lifted? > > There currently isn't a ban in place.[1] [...] > > 1: Thankfully, it hasn't been required yet I am confused

[EMAIL PROTECTED] ban [Re: SmellyWerewolf.com perfume & make-up discount]

2008-11-25 Thread Don Armstrong
On Tue, 25 Nov 2008, Christian Perrier wrote: > Has the d-d-a ban been lifted? There currently isn't a ban in place.[1] [EMAIL PROTECTED] will likely be communicating privately with the individual(s) involved once we have come to consensus ourselves.[2] If some sort of punitive action

FW by [EMAIL PROTECTED] : [Fwd: Wikipidia - Goodbye Red Hat and Fedora]

2008-10-27 Thread Michelle Konzack
Hello *, for those who are interested in... Note: I love Debian because I like HOW it is! Long live Debian! - Forwarded message from Itamar - IspBrasil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 09:53:40 -0300 From: Itamar - IspBrasil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To:

Bug#195481: Info received (Bug#195481: closed by Holger Levsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (upstream issue, not packaging related))

2008-09-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
reply in due course. Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s): If you wish to submit further information on this problem, please send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED], as before. Please do not send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] unless you wish to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system

Bug#195481: closed by Holger Levsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (upstream issue, not packaging related)

2008-09-25 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi, On Tuesday 23 September 2008 23:10, Neil Williams wrote: > > Guess we have different ideas about what "wishlist" bugs are for. > > My attitude is they're for wishes, like the sea is for fishes. > Wishes should still have some possibility of attainment, otherwise it > is wishful-thinking not wi

Bug#195481: closed by Holger Levsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (upstream issue, not packaging related)

2008-09-23 Thread Neil Williams
On Tue, 23 Sep 2008 21:35:23 +0100 "Barak A. Pearlmutter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > (And if there is no progress again within the next two years or so, > > I'll likely close this again.) > > Guess we have different ideas about what "wishlist

Bug#195481: closed by Holger Levsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (upstream issue, not packaging related)

2008-09-23 Thread Barak A. Pearlmutter
k. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#195481: closed by Holger Levsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (upstream issue, not packaging related)

2008-09-23 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi Barak, On Sunday 21 September 2008 19:13, Barak A. Pearlmutter wrote: > > As said, feel free to reopen. > Will do. And you did :-) > Willing? Yes. Able? No, not realistically: too many other plates > spinning in the air. But I'm happy to bounce things around with > people. If there are p

Bug#195481: closed by Holger Levsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (upstream issue, not packaging related)

2008-09-21 Thread Barak A. Pearlmutter
. That's what debian-devel is for, at its best. Then the real hassle starts: rejiggering all the plumbing to hook things into a shiny new system. --Barak. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Bug#195481: closed by Holger Levsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (upstream issue, not packaging related)

2008-09-20 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi Barak, On Saturday 20 September 2008 21:09, Barak A. Pearlmutter wrote: > What makes Debian a "distribution" rather than just a random > collection of miscellaneous software is integration. This is an > integration wishlist. It has to happen at the distribution level if > it is to happen anyw

Bug#195481: closed by Holger Levsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (upstream issue, not packaging related)

2008-09-20 Thread Barak A. Pearlmutter
ce belongs on Package: general. --Barak. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#391118: closed by Holger Levsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (closing)

2008-09-11 Thread Jason Spiro
ad idea. :) -Jason -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[EMAIL PROTECTED] hat Ihnen ein Google Gadget geschickt

2008-07-16 Thread moltechnology
dget wurde Ihnen gesendet von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Schauen Sie täglich auf Ihre iGoogle-Seite unter http://www.google.ch/ig?hl=de, damit Sie keine Aktualisierungen für das Gadget Ihres Freundes verpassen! Möchten Sie eigene Gadgets entwickeln und anderen zur Verfügung stellen? Melden Sie sich an und

[EMAIL PROTECTED] hat Ihnen ein Google Gadget geschickt

2008-07-10 Thread 3kTN2SAAADIMkliphu-kl2lsspz0z . kliphu . vyn
en anderen Änderungen an dem Gadget vor. Besuchen Sie daher täglich Ihre iGoogle-Seite, damit Ihnen keine Neuerungen entgehen. Nachricht Ihres Freundes an Sie: *** Gadget Ihres Freundes zu iGoogle hinzufügen *** Dieses Gadget wurde Ihnen gesendet von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Schauen Sie täglic

RE: [Debian-med-packaging] Processed: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Bug#484045: insighttoolkit_3.6.0-3(hppa/unst

2008-06-03 Thread LuisAntonio da Sila Dias
I am luis Antonio da Silva dias, my objetive is receive fund of foreign to do Application in bank here in Brazil kind regards, Luis Antonio da Silva Dias> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PRO

Processed: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Bug#484045: insighttoolkit_3.6.0-3(hppa/unstable): FTBFS:?missing linux/user.h]

2008-06-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 484045 general Bug#484045: insighttoolkit_3.6.0-3(hppa/unstable): FTBFS: missing linux/user.h Bug reassigned from package `insighttoolkit' to `general'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assista

Re: Bug#467249: FW by [EMAIL PROTECTED] : Bug#467249: man-db: over sensitive on the spell of locale

2008-03-01 Thread Colin Watson
t; time is limited. If people want more information on my plan of attack, > please do let me know, and I'll be happy to share. Drat. Understood, though. I do follow the groff list (when my spam filters haven't decided that it's statistically all spam ...) and do hope to find tim

Re: FW by [EMAIL PROTECTED] : Bug#467249: man-db: over sensitive on the spell of locale

2008-02-29 Thread Colin Watson
I have accepted the bug (see the bug log). I wish people would stop trying to argue that it isn't a bug or that it is a bug somewhere else. Cheers, -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: FW by [EMAIL PROTECTED] : Bug#467249: man-db: over sensitive on the spell of locale

2008-02-28 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
xisting locale, and instead use the correct locale string, which I would suspect is 'zh_CN.UTF-8'. The only workaround to this would be to rewrite glibc and locales, and it does not seem useful to me. Happy hacking, -- Petter Reinholdtsen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Bug#467249: FW by [EMAIL PROTECTED] : Bug#467249: man-db: over sensitive on the spell of locale

2008-02-28 Thread brian m. carlson
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 09:30:55PM +, Colin Watson wrote: On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 09:21:41PM +0100, Adam Borowski wrote: man-db really does have some special-casing here. Trust me. It was necessary at the time. There are a finite number of known aliases for the very small number of locales in

Re: Bug#467249: FW by [EMAIL PROTECTED] : Bug#467249: man-db: over sensitive on the spell of locale

2008-02-28 Thread Colin Watson
nkly, the only way I want to go now. He has already made substantial progress with character class support. Treating all characters equally will absolutely not be acceptable to groff upstream. groff is a typesetter and needs to know about properties of characters. Cheers, -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: FW by [EMAIL PROTECTED] : Bug#467249: man-db: over sensitive on the spell of locale

2008-02-28 Thread Adam Borowski
es. I'm afraid I can do nothing at least until late friday... but it looks like we may be able to help Colin squash at least this bastion of locale dependency. -- 1KB // Microsoft corollary to Hanlon's razor: // Never attribute to stupidity what can be // adequately explained by malice. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

FW by [EMAIL PROTECTED] : Bug#467249: man-db: over sensitive on the spell of locale

2008-02-28 Thread Michelle Konzack
Debian GNU/Linux Consultant - Forwarded message from LI Daobing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 11:51:44 +0800 From: LI Daobing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Bug#467249: man-db: over sensitive on the s

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Processing of ip4r_1.03-1_multi.changes]

2008-02-11 Thread Robert Edmonds
On 2008-02-11, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 05:13:21PM -0500, Robert Edmonds wrote: >> Luk Claes wrote: >> > It was rejected with the following message: > >> > Rejected: ip4r_1.03-1_multi.changes: Missing mandatory fiel

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Processing of ip4r_1.03-1_multi.changes]

2008-02-11 Thread Russ Allbery
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The gpg signature is related to a key, which is related to one or more > email addresses. Whether dak has that information available to it is > another story, though. Assuming the e-mail address on keys is mailable is a

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Processing of ip4r_1.03-1_multi.changes]

2008-02-11 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
the Land of Redmond where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot Henrique Holschuh -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Processing of ip4r_1.03-1_multi.changes]

2008-02-11 Thread Steve Langasek
on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Processing of ip4r_1.03-1_multi.changes]

2008-02-11 Thread Robert Edmonds
Luk Claes wrote: > It was rejected with the following message: > > Rejected: ip4r_1.03-1_multi.changes: Missing mandatory field `description'. Hm, looks like mergechanges is to blame. > You should have got a REJECTED mail telling you btw. I never got a REJECTED mail. -- Robe

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Processing of ip4r_1.03-1_multi.changes]

2008-02-11 Thread Luk Claes
CTED mail telling you btw. Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Processing of ip4r_1.03-1_multi.changes]

2008-02-11 Thread Julien Cristau
package in > NEW or incoming. Where did it go? [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ls /org/ftp.debian.org/queue/*/ip4r_1.03-1_multi.changes /org/ftp.debian.org/queue/reject/ip4r_1.03-1_multi.changes I can't read it, but at least it didn't disappear :) Cheers, Julien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EM

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Processing of ip4r_1.03-1_multi.changes]

2008-02-11 Thread Robert Edmonds
ght but it similarly disappeared. [0] http://people.debian.org/~edmonds/ip4r/ - Forwarded message from Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - From: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Processing of ip4r_1.03-1_multi.changes Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2008 00:01:43 +000

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Bug#411639: x11-common: There should be a way to set per-user environment variables which last the whole X session]

2007-12-30 Thread David Nusinow
he retrospective, overiding 55gnome-session_gnomerc was > the root cause. When documenting this feature for > 30x11-common_xresources, you may want to mention that ~/.gnomerc sourced > by 55gnome-session_gnomerc will overide this setting by > 30x11-common_xresources. Thanks to both you and Holger.

Bug#128852: you don't believe in better se>.<[EMAIL PROTECTED] life?

2007-12-30 Thread hallsy benedick
Good afternoon! Get ready for Christmas holidays with a new you http://dobongworld.com They sailed to the Western Sea, they did, -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Please ignore mail bounces for [EMAIL PROTECTED]

2007-12-27 Thread Theodore Ts'o
Hi all, some of you may have noticed have received mail bounces from mail that you sent me from [EMAIL PROTECTED] that referenced failure to deliver mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], for example: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... Deferred: Connection timed out with thunk.org. Message could not be deliver

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Bug#411639: x11-common: There should be a way to set per-user environment variables which last the whole X session]

2007-12-18 Thread Osamu Aoki
h not preserving environment variable. In the retrospective, overiding 55gnome-session_gnomerc was the root cause. When documenting this feature for 30x11-common_xresources, you may want to mention that ~/.gnomerc sourced by 55gnome-session_gnomerc will overide this setting by 30x11-common_xresou

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Bug#411639: x11-common: There should be a way to set per-user environment variables which last the whole X session]

2007-12-18 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi, On Sunday 16 December 2007 16:29, David Nusinow wrote: >I'd appreciate some brief commentary on this bug from people who are > more aware of the minutia of shells and so forth than I am. Is this really > accurate, or is there a way that the submitter and myself are unaware of > for setting

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Bug#411639: x11-common: There should be a way to set per-user environment variables which last the whole X session]

2007-12-16 Thread David Nusinow
o this bug report that I'll apply if this feature is really missing. Thank you! - David Nusinow - Forwarded message from Hans Schippers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Subject: Bug#411639: x11-common: There should be a way to set per-user environment variables which last the whole

Bug#443406 closed by Torsten Werner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Bug#443406: fixed in liquidlnf 2.9.1-3)

2007-09-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report which was filed against the liquidlnf package: #443406: Use of our external site embedded into a Debian file It has been closed by Torsten Werner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. Their explanation is attached below. If this explanat

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Delivery Status Notification]

2007-09-05 Thread Max Vozeler
On Sat, Sep 01, 2007 at 11:34:05AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: > The manpages-es maintainer's e-mail bounces. Does anyone know how to > contact Rubén Porras Campo? I spoke with Rubén and told him about the mail troubles. I think he can be reached at [EMAIL PROTECTED] for now. He sa

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Delivery Status Notification]

2007-09-01 Thread Colin Watson
The manpages-es maintainer's e-mail bounces. Does anyone know how to contact Rubén Porras Campo? -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Forwarded message from Mail Delivery Service <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassi

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Plans for gs-esp / gs-gpl / gs-afpl in lenny?]

2007-08-15 Thread Till Kamppeter
P drivers. So for Debian the easiest solution is simply rebuilding this Ubuntu package. Till Matt Zimmerman wrote: Subject: Plans for gs-esp / gs-gpl / gs-afpl in lenny? From: Michael Biebl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

2007-07-05 Thread Tara
Hello = [EMAIL PROTECTED],   alva cramer is dionysian verandah but carcinoma = decorous cohen not decorous, satin is french? The midstream alva and teletype but hippodrome not = decorous equitation hoi alva no inappropriate carcinoma      

Is Elie Rosenblum ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) MIA?

2007-06-28 Thread Gunnar Wolf
emoved. I'm right now filing O: bugs on all the packages. If nobody picks them up, I'll close them when importing into the pkg-perl group. Greetings, [1] http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=fnord&comaint=yes -- Gunnar Wolf - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - (+52-55)5623-0154 / 1451-2244 PG

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package Submission

2007-06-27 Thread Steffen Moeller
Hi Zach, On Wednesday 27 June 2007 03:44:21 Zachary Palmer wrote: > Hey, all. I *think* I have a working submission for the contrib section > of Debian mainline; this is the [EMAIL PROTECTED] download-and-install > wrapper that I was discussing a couple days ago. I'm rather new a

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package Submission

2007-06-27 Thread Laszlo Gabor Liszi
Zachary Palmer wrote: Hey, all. I *think* I have a working submission for the contrib section of Debian mainline; this is the [EMAIL PROTECTED] download-and-install wrapper that I was discussing a couple days ago. I'm rather new at this, so I don't know exactly how I should proce

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package Submission

2007-06-26 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
5AD -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGge4bRWRRA3epda0RAqm3AKCVd6YIZ38kjjga/sccSosgNglgWACfd+WO mKEKJq82fYAXBvUKcal8mzk= =LqSR -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Package Submission

2007-06-26 Thread Zachary Palmer
Hey, all. I *think* I have a working submission for the contrib section of Debian mainline; this is the [EMAIL PROTECTED] download-and-install wrapper that I was discussing a couple days ago. I'm rather new at this, so I don't know exactly how I should proceed. What is the pr

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package

2007-06-24 Thread Gabor Gombas
-- MTA SZTAKI Computer and Automation Research Institute Hungarian Academy of Sciences ----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package

2007-06-24 Thread Frank Küster
Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Le vendredi 22 juin 2007 à 14:20 -0400, Zachary Palmer a écrit : >> This software package has pretty much the best reason for >> being closed source that I've encountered; they want to prevent >> falsified re

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package

2007-06-23 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le vendredi 22 juin 2007 à 14:20 -0400, Zachary Palmer a écrit : > This software package has pretty much the best reason for > being closed source that I've encountered; they want to prevent > falsified results from damaging the research. This is probably one of the worst excuses I could find. T

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package

2007-06-23 Thread Guilherme de S. Pastore
Em Sáb, 2007-06-23 às 12:59 +0100, Chris Lamb escreveu: > Charles Plessy wrote: > > > as said in another mail, [EMAIL PROTECTED] is definitely non-free. Hovever, > > if Debian would become an "authorized distributor", the licence would be > > suitable fo

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package

2007-06-23 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Magnus Holmgren wrote: > Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > Has there been any talk about moving to the BOINC infrastructure? There used to be work on a BOINC [EMAIL PROTECTED] client, but this work has stopped due to personnel turnover. See

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package

2007-06-23 Thread Chris Lamb
Charles Plessy wrote: > as said in another mail, [EMAIL PROTECTED] is definitely non-free. Hovever, > if Debian would become an "authorized distributor", the licence would be > suitable for non-free. What about Debian derivatives? /Lamby -- Chris Lamb,

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package

2007-06-23 Thread Magnus Holmgren
Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] doesn't update its client regularly. The release cycle is > possibly > slower than Debian Stable. There has been talk of v6 for several years > now, and I think that version just recently went into alpha testing if > it made

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package

2007-06-23 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
se, there would be a link from the Stanford site to > packages.debian.org for instance. There is a FreeBSD packages which installs the [EMAIL PROTECTED] client by downloading the FAH504-Linux.exe binary from the Stanford website. The Gentoo ebuild works very similar and has been around for

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package

2007-06-22 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Fri, Jun 22, 2007 at 02:20:33PM -0400, Zachary Palmer a écrit : > Hello, all. It has been my understanding that the reason that the > [EMAIL PROTECTED] distributed computing software has not been made a Debian > package is that the license under which it is released does not allow

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package

2007-06-22 Thread Luca Brivio
Alle venerdì 22 giugno 2007, Zachary Palmer ha scritto: > Hello, all. It has been my understanding that the reason that the > [EMAIL PROTECTED] distributed computing software has not been made a Debian > package is that the license under which it is released does not allow it > to

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package

2007-06-22 Thread Kevin Mark
On Fri, Jun 22, 2007 at 02:20:33PM -0400, Zachary Palmer wrote: > Hello, all. It has been my understanding that the reason that the > [EMAIL PROTECTED] distributed computing software has not been made a Debian > package is that the license under which it is released does not allow it

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Package

2007-06-22 Thread Zachary Palmer
Hello, all. It has been my understanding that the reason that the [EMAIL PROTECTED] distributed computing software has not been made a Debian package is that the license under which it is released does not allow it to be free. This software package has pretty much the best reason for being

[EMAIL PROTECTED] (was Re: Why not move Apt to a relational database)

2007-06-03 Thread Philippe Cloutier
Is this the correct mailing list to send this idea to? [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]

2007-05-13 Thread Alexander Wirt
Alexander Wirt schrieb am Samstag, den 12. Mai 2007: > Manoj Srivastava schrieb am Samstag, den 12. Mai 2007: > > Hi Manoj, > > > I would like to backport SELinux related packages to Etch, and > > thus would like to get my key into the backports key ring.What do I > > need to do to en

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]

2007-05-12 Thread Luk Claes
CRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]

2007-05-12 Thread Alexander Wirt
hy do you use -devel? Backports.org has nothing to do with debian-devel. And maybe it would be usefull to have one of us, or even both in CC. I added your key. Alex -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]

2007-05-12 Thread Joerg Jaspert
o line of your mail? That might help. -- bye Joerg Natriumchlorid ist ein hochgefährlicher Stoff, denn er enthält Chlor, welches im Ersten Weltkrieg als Kampfgas eingesetzt wurde. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]

2007-05-12 Thread Manoj Srivastava
stava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.debian.org/~srivasta/> 1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C pgp97499eAMaT.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: Shouldn't [EMAIL PROTECTED] be more liberal on accepting mail?

2007-04-14 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
Petter Reinholdtsen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Shouldn't [EMAIL PROTECTED] be more liberal on accepting mail?

2007-04-13 Thread Nikita V. Youshchenko
> This one time, at band camp, Nikita V. Youshchenko said: >> Looks like with current setup, [EMAIL PROTECTED] does not accept >> mail from domain that does not exist for the outside world. >> >> This looks suboptimal for me: why not accept all mail that looks like a

Re: Shouldn't [EMAIL PROTECTED] be more liberal on accepting mail?

2007-04-13 Thread Stephen Gran
This one time, at band camp, Nikita V. Youshchenko said: > Looks like with current setup, [EMAIL PROTECTED] does not accept > mail from domain that does not exist for the outside world. > > This looks suboptimal for me: why not accept all mail that looks like a > popcon report? &

Re: Shouldn't [EMAIL PROTECTED] be more liberal on accepting mail?

2007-04-12 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Hello, On Fri, 13 Apr 2007, Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote: > Looks like with current setup, [EMAIL PROTECTED] does not accept > mail from domain that does not exist for the outside world. > > This looks suboptimal for me: why not accept all mail that looks like a > popcon re

Re: Shouldn't [EMAIL PROTECTED] be more liberal on accepting mail?

2007-04-12 Thread Bart Martens
On Fri, 2007-04-13 at 02:21 +0400, Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote: > Looks like with current setup, [EMAIL PROTECTED] does not accept > mail from domain that does not exist for the outside world. > > This looks suboptimal for me: why not accept all mail that looks like a > popcon

Shouldn't [EMAIL PROTECTED] be more liberal on accepting mail?

2007-04-12 Thread Nikita V. Youshchenko
Looks like with current setup, [EMAIL PROTECTED] does not accept mail from domain that does not exist for the outside world. This looks suboptimal for me: why not accept all mail that looks like a popcon report? I know that it is possible to do local setup such as mail will look more

help requested [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: Bug#366146: libfann: new upstream release includes debian packaging]

2007-04-03 Thread Allan Lyons
this package actually updated. I can't sponsor it myself since I'm not a DD. - Forwarded message from Steffen Nissen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Subject: Re: Bug#366146: libfann: new upstream release includes debian packaging The 2.0.0 package was made and uploaded, but it was

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: /usr/sbin/sshd: wrong DISPLAY is due to hijacking someone other's one...]

2007-03-06 Thread Yaroslav Halchenko
-- Yaroslav Halchenko Research Assistant, Psychology Department, Rutgers-Newark Student Ph.D. @ CS Dept. NJIT Office: (973) 353-5440x263 | FWD: 82823 | Fax: (973) 353-1171 101 Warren Str, Smith Hall, Rm 4-105, Newark NJ 07102 WWW: http://www.linkedin.com/in/yarik -- To UNSUBSC

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: /usr/sbin/sshd: wrong DISPLAY is due to hijacking someone other's one...]

2007-03-05 Thread Ben Hutchings
ting a commit. > (following [1]) to see what/when it really happened - > so it wasn't a BSD specific patch, it was only adopted by bsd team in 2002 but > was in portable ssh since 1.2.2p1 (Mar 2000). I am not sure on either I > should ask for help from [EMAIL PROTECTED] or let

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: /usr/sbin/sshd: wrong DISPLAY is due to hijacking someone other's one...]

2007-03-05 Thread Marco d'Itri
On Mar 05, Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This is probably referring to binding an IPv6 :: socket and getting IPv4 > for free, so that a subsequent bind to an IPv4 0.0.0.0 address fails. So > far as I know, this is still the Linux IPv6 behavior. Yes, but it can be contr

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: /usr/sbin/sshd: wrong DISPLAY is due to hijacking someone other's one...]

2007-03-05 Thread Hendrik Sattler
Am Montag 05 März 2007 19:59 schrieb Russ Allbery: > Yaroslav Halchenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > and if socket on IPv4 is taken already? this is what lead to the > > original issue. > > > > So should that "continue" should then be taken only if ai

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: /usr/sbin/sshd: wrong DISPLAY is due to hijacking someone other's one...]

2007-03-05 Thread Russ Allbery
Yaroslav Halchenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > and if socket on IPv4 is taken already? this is what lead to the > original issue. > So should that "continue" should then be taken only if ai->ai_family == > AF_INET6 ? Maybe. I don't know that part of th

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: /usr/sbin/sshd: wrong DISPLAY is due to hijacking someone other's one...]

2007-03-05 Thread Yaroslav Halchenko
Newark Student Ph.D. @ CS Dept. NJIT Office: (973) 353-5440x263 | FWD: 82823 | Fax: (973) 353-1171 101 Warren Str, Smith Hall, Rm 4-105, Newark NJ 07102 WWW: http://www.linkedin.com/in/yarik -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: /usr/sbin/sshd: wrong DISPLAY is due to hijacking someone other's one...]

2007-03-05 Thread Russ Allbery
Yaroslav Halchenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > ,- > | revision 1.17 > | date: 2000/03/03 11:35:33; author: damien; state: Exp; lines: +9 -1 > | - Don't permanently fail on bind() if getaddrinfo has more choices left for > | us. Needed to work around messy

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: /usr/sbin/sshd: wrong DISPLAY is due to hijacking someone other's one...]

2007-03-05 Thread Yaroslav Halchenko
sure on either I should ask for help from [EMAIL PROTECTED] or let openssh maintainer to resolve the issue in the best way. ,- | revision 1.17 | date: 2000/03/03 11:35:33; author: damien; state: Exp; lines: +9 -1 | - Don't permanently fail on bind() if getaddrinfo has more choices left

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: /usr/sbin/sshd: wrong DISPLAY is due to hijacking someone other's one...]

2007-03-03 Thread Yaroslav Halchenko
| FWD: 82823 | Fax: (973) 353-1171 101 Warren Str, Smith Hall, Rm 4-105, Newark NJ 07102 WWW: http://www.linkedin.com/in/yarik -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: /usr/sbin/sshd: wrong DISPLAY is due to hijacking someone other's one...]

2007-03-02 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Thu, 2007-03-01 at 17:44 -0500, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote: > | if (ai->ai_next) > | continue; I believe these two lines are the source of the bug. Here's the change that introduced it: http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvswe

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: /usr/sbin/sshd: wrong DISPLAY is due to hijacking someone other's one...]

2007-03-01 Thread Yaroslav Halchenko
nning in > verbose/debug modes. May be it would give a hint to a knowledgeable > person > http://www.onerussian.com/Linux/bugs/ssh.display/ -- .-. =-- /v\ = Keep in touch// \\ (yoh@|www.)onerussian.com Yaroslav Halchenko /( )\ ICQ#: 60653192 Linux User^^-^^[17] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: /usr/sbin/sshd: wrong DISPLAY is due to hijacking someone other's one...]

2007-03-01 Thread Yaroslav Halchenko
\ = Keep in touch// \\ (yoh@|www.)onerussian.com Yaroslav Halchenko /( )\ ICQ#: 60653192 Linux User^^-^^[17] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troubl

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: /usr/sbin/sshd: wrong DISPLAY is due to hijacking someone other's one...]

2007-03-01 Thread Yaroslav Halchenko
. for now I am going to check the trace in channels.c:x11_create_display_inet which is the one handing out DISPLAYs - Forwarded message from Yaroslav Halchenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2007 16:59:29 -0500 From: Yaroslav Halchenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bu

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

2007-02-23 Thread Raphael Hertzog
r direct use by DSA and not for public use) Cheers, -- Raphaël Hertzog Premier livre français sur Debian GNU/Linux : http://www.ouaza.com/livre/admin-debian/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

2007-02-23 Thread Turbo Fredriksson
IV0kVhg/fgCcCFp1 +TGvzbqRt9nn9SgTFta+h+g= =pith -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

hijacking asciidoc - [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIA?

2007-01-28 Thread Alexander Wirt
Hi, asciidoc is currently in a bad shape and pretty outdated, as I use asciidoc regulary I'm very interested in having a new and good maintained asciidoc package. Unfortunatly there are bugs like #376523 which are really annoying and easy to fix. The maintainer also seems to be very inactive, acc

Re: Is Anand Kumria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MIA?

2007-01-27 Thread Paul TBBle Hampson
On Sat, Jan 27, 2007 at 04:03:10PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > It seems that Anand Kumria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> is missing in action. > He's not doing anything about gtk-gnutella and doesn't reply to my emails. He is however still submitting bug reports. #405244 was su

Is Anand Kumria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MIA?

2007-01-27 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It seems that Anand Kumria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> is missing in action. He's not doing anything about gtk-gnutella and doesn't reply to my emails. Ahora también puedes acceder a tu correo Terra desde el móvil. Infórmate en www.terra.es/correo.

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

2006-12-21 Thread 免費廣告信學院
最新發信程式下載,免費完整教學,都在 http://home.kimo.com.tw/edmschool002

Re: Do not use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for bug ping-pong

2006-12-16 Thread Andreas Barth
* Jari Aalto ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061216 10:23]: > Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Fri, 15 Dec 2006, Marc Haber wrote: > >> But I feel that it is _wrong_ to close wishlist bugs like that. It > >> is ok to tag them wontfix or help, or ev

Re: Do not use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for bug ping-pong

2006-12-16 Thread Jari Aalto
Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Fri, 15 Dec 2006, Marc Haber wrote: >> But I feel that it is _wrong_ to close wishlist bugs like that. It >> is ok to tag them wontfix or help, or even usertag them send-patch, >> but closing them immediately doesn&#x

Re: Do not use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for bug ping-pong

2006-12-15 Thread Don Armstrong
ong 1: At least, I try not to. -- Fate and Temperament are two words for one and the same concept. -- Novalis [Hermann Hesse _Demian_] http://www.donarmstrong.com http://rzlab.ucr.edu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Do not use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for bug ping-pong

2006-12-15 Thread Marc Haber
On Fri, 15 Dec 2006 04:06:49 -0800, Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On Thu, 14 Dec 2006, Steve Langasek wrote: >> On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 03:05:35AM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote: >> > If you're doing this, you better have already written (or gotten >> &g

Re: Do not use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for bug ping-pong

2006-12-15 Thread Don Armstrong
that might go wrong and a thing that cannot possibly go wrong is that when a thing that cannot possibly go wrong goes wrong it usually turns out to be impossible to get at or repair. -- Douglas Adams _Mostly Harmless_ http://www.donarmstrong.com http://rzlab.ucr.edu -- To UNSUBS

  1   2   >