* Benjamin Herrenschmidt
| Have we any proper way of doing multiarch setups ? The "proper" way to
| do ppc64 is to have both archs libs and 32 bits userland for most
| things, as ppc64 native code is slightly slower.
Not at the moment, no. I'm working on multiarch and how to handle it
as my mas
On 05-Mar-17 09:31, Bastian Blank wrote:
> glibc 2.3.2 does not properly support powerpc64.
This is correct. Because of this, the ppc64 Port uses glibc-2.3.4.
The current Debian package has been patched to use version 2.3.4 for the
ppc64 port.
All patches used by the current Debian glibc which a
On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 09:46:36AM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-03-16 at 20:27 +0100, Andreas Jochens wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > This is a call for help from the 'ppc64' porters.
> >
> > On 05-Mar-14 16:14, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> > > Also, as with the amd64 port, there i
On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 09:46:36AM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> Have we any proper way of doing multiarch setups ? The "proper" way to
> do ppc64 is to have both archs libs and 32 bits userland for most
> things, as ppc64 native code is slightly slower.
The packages are waiting for some
On Wed, 2005-03-16 at 23:59 +0100, Andreas Jochens wrote:
> On 05-Mar-17 09:46, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > Have we any proper way of doing multiarch setups ? The "proper" way to
> > do ppc64 is to have both archs libs and 32 bits userland for most
> > things, as ppc64 native code is slightly
On Wed, 2005-03-16 at 23:59 +0100, Andreas Jochens wrote:
> On 05-Mar-17 09:46, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > Have we any proper way of doing multiarch setups ? The "proper" way to
> > do ppc64 is to have both archs libs and 32 bits userland for most
> > things, as ppc64 native code is slightly
On 05-Mar-17 09:46, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> Have we any proper way of doing multiarch setups ? The "proper" way to
> do ppc64 is to have both archs libs and 32 bits userland for most
> things, as ppc64 native code is slightly slower.
Detailed measurements of 32 bit vs. 64 bit code for diff
On Wed, 2005-03-16 at 20:27 +0100, Andreas Jochens wrote:
> Hello,
>
> This is a call for help from the 'ppc64' porters.
>
> On 05-Mar-14 16:14, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> > Also, as with the amd64 port, there is disagreement about the name.
> > While ppc64 would be nicer and in line with the LSB
8 matches
Mail list logo
