Re: [ANNOUNCE] git-series: track changes to a patch series over time

2016-08-12 Thread Josh Triplett
f the requirements may directly contract each other. That seems fine. On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 03:27:06PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: > Josh Triplett writes ("Re: [ANNOUNCE] git-series: track changes to a patch > series over time"): > > On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 12:31:49

Re: [ANNOUNCE] git-series: track changes to a patch series over time

2016-08-12 Thread Ian Jackson
Josh Triplett writes ("Re: [ANNOUNCE] git-series: track changes to a patch series over time"): > On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 12:31:49PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: > > Josh Triplett writes ("Re: [ANNOUNCE] git-series: track changes to a patch > > series over time")

Re: [ANNOUNCE] git-series: track changes to a patch series over time

2016-08-12 Thread Josh Triplett
On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 12:31:49PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: > Josh Triplett writes ("Re: [ANNOUNCE] git-series: track changes to a patch > series over time"): > > On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 01:16:04PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: > > > My biggest question therefore is

Re: [ANNOUNCE] git-series: track changes to a patch series over time

2016-08-12 Thread Ian Jackson
Josh Triplett writes ("Re: [ANNOUNCE] git-series: track changes to a patch series over time"): > On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 01:16:04PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: > > My biggest question therefore is: how does your tool compare to > > stgit ? Why should we use your tool rathe

Re: [ANNOUNCE] git-series: track changes to a patch series over time

2016-08-11 Thread Josh Triplett
On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 01:16:04PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: > Josh Triplett writes ("[ANNOUNCE] git-series: track changes to a patch series > over time"): > > I'd like to announce a project I've been working on for a while: > > Thanks for the info. I have

Re: [ANNOUNCE] git-series: track changes to a patch series over time

2016-08-11 Thread Ian Jackson
Josh Triplett writes ("[ANNOUNCE] git-series: track changes to a patch series over time"): > I'd like to announce a project I've been working on for a while: Thanks for the info. I have an interest in this kind of thing. (At one point I tried to make a workable data m

Re: [ANNOUNCE] git-series: track changes to a patch series over time

2016-07-30 Thread Paul Wise
On Sat, Jul 30, 2016 at 4:10 PM, Josh Triplett wrote: > I plan to; I'm working with the Debian Rust packaging team, and we're > using git-series as a test case to develop Policy and processes for > packaging programs written in Rust for Debian. Great, it would be interesting to see Rust/Cargo men

Re: [ANNOUNCE] git-series: track changes to a patch series over time

2016-07-30 Thread Josh Triplett
Paul Wise wrote: > On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 2:57 PM, Josh Triplett wrote: > > I'd like to announce a project I've been working on for a while: > > > > git-series provides a tool for managing patch series with git, tracking > > the "history of history". git series tracks changes to the patch series >

Re: [ANNOUNCE] git-series: track changes to a patch series over time

2016-07-29 Thread Paul Wise
On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 2:57 PM, Josh Triplett wrote: > I'd like to announce a project I've been working on for a while: > > git-series provides a tool for managing patch series with git, tracking > the "history of history". git series tracks changes to the patch series > over time, including reba

[ANNOUNCE] git-series: track changes to a patch series over time

2016-07-28 Thread Josh Triplett
I'd like to announce a project I've been working on for a while: git-series provides a tool for managing patch series with git, tracking the "history of history". git series tracks changes to the patch series over time, including rebases and other non-fast-forwarding changes. git series also track