On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 2:43:29PM +0100, Daniel Silverstone wrote:
> Also, if you search for my GPG key id (20687895) then I get a listing of my
> packages and also those maintained by [EMAIL PROTECTED] We've had issues of
> my being mistaken for Daniel Stone in the past, and I don't appreciate it
Hi!
This tool is great and very useful.
However, there is a little bug with some kind of mangling of the version
numbers:
on "http://qa.debian.org/developer/index.php?package=loadwatch";,
loadwatch appears to have 2 different versions in testing and unstable
(1.0_1.1alpha1-1 and 1.0+1.1alpha1-1),
On Wed, 28 Aug 2002, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Igor Genibel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-08-28 17:20]:
> > http://qa.debian.org/developer/
>
> If you want to have it hosted there, you should really
> a) put the files in CVS (module qa), and follow the current standards
>for web pages (i.e. hav
* Igor Genibel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-08-28 17:20]:
> http://qa.debian.org/developer/
If you want to have it hosted there, you should really
a) put the files in CVS (module qa), and follow the current standards
for web pages (i.e. have wml files in qa/wml which are build
and then copied t
Am 28.08.02 um 17:20:44 schrieb Igor Genibel:
> I'm sorry I confused the NMU and the uploader field. There was a bug,
> fixed for now.
Ah, great! I really don't have anything to complain about now.[1]
Bye,
Mike
[1] Where I come from, "I can't complain" is equivalent to
"I think it's bril
I see an issue with the link to bugs,non-fixed. The web page
adds the url tag "raw=yes". I'm not certain of the function of that
url tag. But, with it in, the bugs page shows all of the active bugs
instead of excluding bugs that marked fixed or done.
Is this a bug in the bugs.d.o/cgi-bin/packager
On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 11:52:49AM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> > I don't quite understand these colours right now. What does
> > "Packages in blue" refer to? The link colour? And I don't see many
> > "Packages version in red" either, even when I'm sure it's an NMU.
>
> It's talking about the color o
Michael Piefel wrote:
> Am 27.08.02 um 13:38:36 schrieb Joey Hess:
> > - It seems to think that analog 2:5.23-0woody1 is a NMU.
>
> I don't quite understand these colours right now. What does
> "Packages in blue" refer to? The link colour? And I don't see many
> "Packages version in red" either, e
On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 04:31:51PM +0200, Michael Piefel wrote:
> Because packages are not required to have an "Uploaders" field. I'm
> afraid I don't quite understand your algorithm. For which package will
> there ever be a red markup?
I'm sorry I confused the NMU and the uploader field. There wa
Le Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 12:17:13PM +0100, Thom May écrivait:
> > I'm sure some will squirm, but I think my.debian.org would work quite
> > nicely :-)
> >
> uh. E
> (developer.debian.org, maybe)
The new official name is http://qa.debian.org/developer/
Cheer
Am 28.08.02 um 16:03:28 schrieb Igor Genibel:
> > For instance 10a-1.1 for package kimwitu-doc. Or 3.37-3.1 for file.
> I don't know why there is no Uploader field for those packages.
Because packages are not required to have an "Uploaders" field. I'm
afraid I don't quite understand your algorith
On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 03:26:44PM +0200, Michael Piefel wrote:
Hi,
> Am 28.08.02 um 10:15:45 schrieb Raphael Hertzog:
> > Packages in blue are packages where you're listed as co-maintainers (cf
> > the Uplpoaders field in the control file).
>
> Alright, but the description "uploaded by develope
Am 28.08.02 um 10:15:45 schrieb Raphael Hertzog:
> Packages in blue are packages where you're listed as co-maintainers (cf
> the Uplpoaders field in the control file).
Alright, but the description "uploaded by developer" is a little
misleading.
> I guess it detects the NMU with a regexp in the ve
On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 03:51:11AM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 02:24:57PM +0200, Igor Genibel wrote:
>> I have enhanced the ddpo (http://people.debian.org/~igenibel/index.php)
>> following all the request you made me (especially Yann Dirson).
>> Now you, developers, can tra
* Hamish Moffatt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 10:20:46AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > For Igor, we could provide him a place somewhere under qa.debian.org if
> > he wish I guess. Igor, can you check if satie.debian.org provides
> > everything that you need ?
>
> I'm s
On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 10:20:46AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> For Igor, we could provide him a place somewhere under qa.debian.org if
> he wish I guess. Igor, can you check if satie.debian.org provides
> everything that you need ?
I'm sure some will squirm, but I think my.debian.org would wor
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 02:43:29PM +0100, Daniel Silverstone wrote:
Hi,
> Also, if you search for my GPG key id (20687895) then I get a listing of my
> packages and also those maintained by [EMAIL PROTECTED] We've had issues of
> my being mistaken for Daniel Stone in the past, and I don't appreci
Le Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 03:51:11AM +0200, Josip Rodin écrivait:
> On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 02:24:57PM +0200, Igor Genibel wrote:
> > I have enhanced the ddpo (http://people.debian.org/~igenibel/index.php)
> > following all the request you made me (especially Yann Dirson).
> > Now you, developers, c
Le Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 09:25:42AM +0200, Michael Piefel écrivait:
> I don't quite understand these colours right now. What does
> "Packages in blue" refer to? The link colour? And I don't see many
Packages in blue are packages where you're listed as co-maintainers (cf
the Uplpoaders field in the
On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 03:57:14AM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> > Although, I have one request -- please skip the ampersand in URLs like
> > 'build.php?&pkg=foo', they are redundant and they waste bytes :)
>
> On the same note, please add the missing / in pool URLs, to skip the
> redirect and follo
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 08:53:11AM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Hi Igor,
Hi,
> > I have enhanced the ddpo (http://people.debian.org/~igenibel/index.php)
> > following all the request you made me (especially Yann Dirson).
>
> The site looks great! One request, is it possible to add submit but
Hello,
I found another bug. In the list of available packages the source
libsigc++-1.1 is visibile/accessible but libsigc++ does not seem to exist.
Michael
* Igor Genibel
| I have enhanced the ddpo (http://people.debian.org/~igenibel/index.php)
| following all the request you made me (especially Yann Dirson).
| Now you, developers, can track all the informations about all your
| packages such as:
| - the pts related page about packages (Thank
Am 27.08.02 um 13:38:36 schrieb Joey Hess:
> - It seems to think that analog 2:5.23-0woody1 is a NMU.
I don't quite understand these colours right now. What does
"Packages in blue" refer to? The link colour? And I don't see many
"Packages version in red" either, even when I'm sure it's an NMU.
>
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 06:02:24PM +0200, Michael Piefel wrote:
> Am 27.08.02 um 14:24:57 schrieb Igor Genibel:
> > - the number of opened bugs (All, RC, ...);
>
> Either I don't understand the statistics, or it's not correct. For
> instance, on http://people.debian.org/~igenibel/index.php?login=n
On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 03:51:11AM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> Although, I have one request -- please skip the ampersand in URLs like
> 'build.php?&pkg=foo', they are redundant and they waste bytes :)
On the same note, please add the missing / in pool URLs, to skip the
redirect and follow the spec
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 02:24:57PM +0200, Igor Genibel wrote:
> I have enhanced the ddpo (http://people.debian.org/~igenibel/index.php)
> following all the request you made me (especially Yann Dirson).
> Now you, developers, can track all the informations about all your
> packages such as:
>
Igor Genibel wrote:
> I have enhanced the ddpo (http://people.debian.org/~igenibel/index.php)
> following all the request you made me (especially Yann Dirson).
This is very nice. A few comments:
- It seems to think that analog 2:5.23-0woody1 is a NMU.
- On a 1280 pixel wide display, I can only s
Am 27.08.02 um 14:24:57 schrieb Igor Genibel:
> - the number of opened bugs (All, RC, ...);
Either I don't understand the statistics, or it's not correct. For
instance, on http://people.debian.org/~igenibel/index.php?login=nick you
can see there is 1 bug for the file package. But in fact there's d
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 05:18:58PM +0200, Michael Piefel wrote:
> > Looks like confusion with aewm++, which in turn seems to provoke the bug
> > Daniel Burrows mentioned, so there's probably some additional regexp
> > metacharacter escaping needed somewhere.
>
> Yes, very similar problem for kimwi
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 09:36:12AM -0400, Decklin Foster wrote:
Hi,
> I think I've found a bug: aewm is listed as having version 1.0.16-3 in
> stable and testing, but there is no such version of that package.
> According to madison 1.2.0-1 is installed in all 3 dists.
It is now fixed. As Colin s
Am 27.08.02 um 15:03:31 schrieb Colin Watson:
> > I think I've found a bug: aewm is listed as having version 1.0.16-3 in
> > stable and testing, but there is no such version of that package.
> > According to madison 1.2.0-1 is installed in all 3 dists.
> Looks like confusion with aewm++, which in t
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 10:10:26PM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> It would really be nice if it is possible to know if there are any logs with
> build failure in the buildd link,
> but it probably needs more work on the buildd page side?
Last year (!) I write a patch for the buildd log page and s
On Tue, 27 Aug 2002, Igor Genibel wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have enhanced the ddpo (http://people.debian.org/~igenibel/index.php)
> following all the request you made me (especially Yann Dirson).
> Now you, developers, can track all the informations about all your
> packages such as:
> - the
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 09:08:44AM -0400, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> Hm, am I supposed to get hundreds of kilobytes of this?
Surely not ! ;)
> Warning: Compilation failed: nothing to repeat at offset 9
> in /home/igenibel/public_html/html.php on line 349
>
> Warning: Compilation failed: noth
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 09:36:12AM -0400, Decklin Foster wrote:
> Igor Genibel writes:
> > I have enhanced the ddpo (http://people.debian.org/~igenibel/index.php)
>
> I think I've found a bug: aewm is listed as having version 1.0.16-3 in
> stable and testing, but there is no such version of that
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 02:11:40PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> OK, things seem to have suddenly got quite a lot more nifty while I
> wasn't watching. Thanks!
Thanks a lot to.
> I notice one slight glitch; following a PTS link to a lib* package takes
> you to e.g. http://pts.debian.net/l/libfilte
Hi Igor,
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 02:24:57PM +0200, Igor Genibel wrote:
> I have enhanced the ddpo (http://people.debian.org/~igenibel/index.php)
> following all the request you made me (especially Yann Dirson).
The site looks great! One request, is it possible to add submit buttons
for each of
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 02:43:29PM +0100, Daniel Silverstone wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 09:36:12AM -0400, Decklin Foster wrote:
> > Igor Genibel writes:
> > > I have enhanced the ddpo (http://people.debian.org/~igenibel/index.php)
> > I think I've found a bug: aewm is listed as having versio
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 09:36:12AM -0400, Decklin Foster wrote:
> Igor Genibel writes:
> > I have enhanced the ddpo (http://people.debian.org/~igenibel/index.php)
> I think I've found a bug: aewm is listed as having version 1.0.16-3 in
Also, if you search for my GPG key id (20687895) then I get a
Igor Genibel writes:
> I have enhanced the ddpo (http://people.debian.org/~igenibel/index.php)
I think I've found a bug: aewm is listed as having version 1.0.16-3 in
stable and testing, but there is no such version of that package.
According to madison 1.2.0-1 is installed in all 3 dists.
Other
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 02:24:57PM +0200, Igor Genibel wrote:
> I have enhanced the ddpo (http://people.debian.org/~igenibel/index.php)
> following all the request you made me (especially Yann Dirson).
OK, things seem to have suddenly got quite a lot more nifty while I
wasn't watching. Thanks!
I
Hm, am I supposed to get hundreds of kilobytes of this?
Warning: Compilation failed: nothing to repeat at offset 9
in /home/igenibel/public_html/html.php on line 349
Warning: Compilation failed: nothing to repeat at offset 9
in /home/igenibel/public_html/html.php on line 349
...
Loo
On Tue, 27 Aug 2002 14:24:57 +0200
Igor Genibel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> - the number of opened bugs (All, RC, ...);
> - the broken dependencies for each branch (stable, testing, unstable).
This is simply, great. Good work!
It would really be nice if it is possible to know if there are any l
Hi Igor,
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 02:24:57PM +0200, Igor Genibel wrote:
> I have enhanced the ddpo (http://people.debian.org/~igenibel/index.php)
> following all the request you made me (especially Yann Dirson).
>
> I waiting for you comments, advices, insults or other things.
Many thanks for you
Hi all,
I have enhanced the ddpo (http://people.debian.org/~igenibel/index.php)
following all the request you made me (especially Yann Dirson).
Now you, developers, can track all the informations about all your
packages such as:
- the pts related page about packages (Thanks a lot to Raphaël
46 matches
Mail list logo
