On Tue, 22 Aug 2023 at 10:21, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> Let me also put this into numbers. Across all suites, we have around
> 2200 binary packages shipping files in aliased locations. If you
> disregard systemd units, we're left with 1030 packages. In other words,
> more than half of the binary pack
Control: forwarded -1
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/debhelper/-/merge_requests/108
Control: tags -1 + patch
On Sun, Aug 20, 2023 at 11:19:56PM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Related to that:
> dh_installsystemd (and the old, deprecated dh_systemd_enable) currently only
> consider systemd unit fi
Am 19.08.23 um 23:14 schrieb Helmut Grohne:
## dh_usrmerge
I intend to add a new tool dh_usrmerge to debhelper (not yet
implemented). Its purpose is performing the path canonicalization in
binary packages. As long as the moratorium is in effect, this helper
must not be used. It shall be possibl
Hi Helmut,
On 19-08-2023 23:14, Helmut Grohne wrote:
I recognize that this is quite a non-standard way to ask for a MBF. Does
anyone object to me doing it in this way?
I recall I said this before, but just in case. In my opinion (with my
Release Team member hat on, but not on behalf of the t
Hi,
Yeah, I know we have too many /usr-merge discussions. Still, there is
reason to continue posting. My last summary/status was
https://lists.debian.org/20230712133438.ga935...@subdivi.de from July
12th and I'm giving an update of what happened since then here and
explain how I want to move forwa
5 matches
Mail list logo