Re: /usr/local (again)

1996-09-05 Thread Dominik Kubla
Hi folks, it's me again :) Lars Wirzenius wrote: > I'd like some (easy) way of storing answers to questions. The > questions and answers could be shared between packages, when > suitable. One such question would be whether the local admin > wants to allow creation of the empty directories in /usr/

Re: /usr/local (again)

1996-09-04 Thread Richard Kaszeta
>> Another possibility would be to have a script that runs immediately when >> you select the package using "dselect", before the package is unpacked, and >> squirrels away your input for later. Of course, we'd have to run it from >> "dpkg" if "dselect" was not used. >> >> Discussion, please? > >I

Re: /usr/local (again)

1996-09-04 Thread Buddha Buck
> I'd like some (easy) way of storing answers to questions. The > questions and answers could be shared between packages, when > suitable. One such question would be whether the local admin > wants to allow creation of the empty directories in /usr/local. > > If we want to be ambitious, we'll crea

Re: /usr/local (again)

1996-09-04 Thread Lars Wirzenius
Bruce Perens: > Another possibility would be to have a script that runs immediately when > you select the package using "dselect", before the package is unpacked, and > squirrels away your input for later. Of course, we'd have to run it from > "dpkg" if "dselect" was not used. > > Discussion, plea

Re: /usr/local (again)

1996-09-04 Thread Bruce Perens
From: Stuart Lamble <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Just a suggestion (and probably not a very good one): where a package needs > to ask a question, perhaps it'd be appropriate to have a script > postinst.questions (or some such) which can be run after all the other > packages have been installed and configu

Re: /usr/local (again)

1996-09-03 Thread Stuart Lamble
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bruce Perens) wrote: [snipped] >Ouch! > >What I object to is another question in the postinst. I installed several >Debian systems last week, and there were too many questions - the effect >was that you could not let the installation run unattended. What's worse, >some maintaine

Re: /usr/local (again)

1996-09-03 Thread Bruce Perens
Bruce: > Let's please not add unnecessary questions in the postinst. > I think /usr/local should be a symbolic link to /local, but it should > always exist. From: Dominik Kubla <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > We will not gain anything with this! I am sure if you think about it > you will recognize that this

Re: /usr/local (again)

1996-09-03 Thread Dominik Kubla
Dear Bruce, you wrote: > Let's please not add unnecessary questions in the postinst. > I think /usr/local should be a symbolic link to /local, but it should > always exist. We will not gain anything with this! I am sure if you think about it you will recognize that this will just shift the prob

Re: /usr/local (again)

1996-09-03 Thread Bruce Perens
> At installation time ask the installer where the local directory is > located and make create a link /etc/local/ to the location > given by the installing person. Let's please not add unnecessary questions in the postinst. I think /usr/local should be a symbolic link to /local, but it should alw

Re: /usr/local (again)

1996-09-02 Thread Dominik Kubla
Hello Ian, you wrote: >In order that the system administrator may know where to place >additional files a package should create an empty directory in the >appropriate place in /usr/local by supplying it in the filesystem >archive for unpacking by dpkg. The /usr/local directo

Re: /usr/local (again)

1996-08-31 Thread Ian Jackson
Richard Kaszeta writes ("/usr/local (again)"): ... > Since packages generally don't install anything other than empty dirs > in /usr/local, can't this be handled in a way that makes it easier for > those of us trying to maintain many debian machines? Section 3.2.

Re: /usr/local (again)

1996-08-27 Thread Richard Kaszeta
>I sort of thought we had settled on (a). Although I would normally >expect /usr/*local* to be local, I don't see any reason not to be >friendly to unusual setups especially in the case of (c) where it >doesn't cost anything, assuming the base package puts in a reasonable >default. Well, in my ca

Re: /usr/local (again)

1996-08-27 Thread Dominik Kubla
> Richard Kaszeta writes: > Just an idea, no flames, etc intended: Could maintainers who have > packages that create directories/etc in /usr/local make sure they do > it in a way that is friendly to nfs-mounted /usr/local? I second that! AMOF i did bring that up some time ago, but somehow we

/usr/local (again)

1996-08-26 Thread Richard Kaszeta
Just an idea, no flames, etc intended: Could maintainers who have packages that create directories/etc in /usr/local make sure they do it in a way that is friendly to nfs-mounted /usr/local? Example: On all of our debian 1.1 machines, /usr/local is an nfs mounted directory, and on all but one of