On 19.09.2001, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Sep 2001, Norbert Veber wrote:
>
> > Interesting. How did you obtain the environment dump?
>
> "set", with no arguments. May be a bashism, though. Not sure.
I used the env program.
~$ env --version
env (GNU sh-utils) 2.0.11
~$ env|grep SHELL
S
"Sean 'Shaleh' Perry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > It works... Something's wrong with your system.
> > Try strace'ing ls.
>
> what shell are you playing with? I presume most people are using bash.
Zsh.
Phil.
On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 01:35:28PM -0500, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 11:00:31AM -0500, David Starner wrote:
> > Interesting. It just starts mallocing more and more memory, increasing
> > by 4 bytes at a time. gdb worked, but man wasn't happy, and neither
> > was top.
>
> Weird,
>
> It works... Something's wrong with your system.
> Try strace'ing ls.
>
what shell are you playing with? I presume most people are using bash.
On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 02:03:02PM -0400, Norbert Veber wrote:
> However, even after I set it back to 80, via export COLUMNS=80, ls still
> fails, and it is set back to 49151 after I logout and log back in.
'stty columns 80' will fix it. purity is also setting rows to 64049.
Use 'stty -a' to see t
On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 10:14:24PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Sep 2001, Norbert Veber wrote:
>
> > Interesting. How did you obtain the environment dump?
>
> "set", with no arguments. May be a bashism, though. Not sure.
it is not a bashism.
-john
Previously Pekka Lampila wrote:
> Actually it's not.
Actually it is, your shell probably just sets COLUMNS dynamically instead of
using it as a normal environment vairable.
> Obviously purity shouldn't change these values.
No, purity can't change the environment settings for its parent process
(
On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 10:46:45AM -0400, Norbert Veber wrote:
> Either finish the test, or abort it via ctrl-c or the "q" command.
>
> --> Now run ls.
Reproduced, and fixed... Problem with purity doing stty stuff...
Throughout, $COLUMNS never changes, but stty config does.
On Wed, 19 Sep 2001, Norbert Veber wrote:
> Interesting. How did you obtain the environment dump?
"set", with no arguments. May be a bashism, though. Not sure.
--
wouter dot verhelst at advalvas dot be
"Human knowledge belongs to the world"
-- From the movie "Antitrust"
rm -rf /bin/laden
On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 11:00:31AM -0500, David Starner wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 10:46:45AM -0400, Norbert Veber wrote:
> > --> Now run ls.
> >
> > Be prepared to abort it before it consumes all the available memory on your
> > system.
>
> Interesting. It just starts mallocing more and mo
On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 11:53:10AM -0400, Chris Danis wrote:
> brooks% echo $COLUMNS
> 49151
...
> purity seems to be causing this. No idea why or how, but it seems to be
> the culprit.
It would seem this is why:
diff -r purity-1/pt.c purity-1.fix/pt.c
792c792
< (void) ioctl(0,TIOCSWINSZ,&
On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 07:32:34PM +0300, Pekka Lampila wrote:
> On 19.09.2001, Norbert Veber wrote:
> > The environment is unchanged, the aliases are unchanged,
>
> Actually it's not.
>
> ~/dbg$ diff env.before env.after
> 17c17
> < LINES=27
> ---
> > LINES=64218
> 24c24
> < COLUMNS=169
> ---
>
Alan Shutko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Looks like it's only the purity in unstable (1-11). In fact, it looks
> like it's the termios patch put in purity 1-10 that is munging stty
> settings.
Yep, a typo... it wanted to query the settings, but actually set
them. Oops.
Patch will go into BTS
On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 09:08:01AM -0700, Philippe Troin wrote:
[...]
> It works... Something's wrong with your system.
> Try strace'ing ls.
What terminal are you doing this in? Ie. console/xterm/gnome-terminal/etc..
Thanks,
Norbert
pgpBs3QIdao5m.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Philippe Troin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Get:1 http://debian.commerceflow.com woody/main purity 1-9 [25.7kB]
Looks like it's only the purity in unstable (1-11). In fact, it looks
like it's the termios patch put in purity 1-10 that is munging stty
settings.
(Aaron, if you haven't been follow
On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 11:53:10AM -0400, Chris Danis wrote:
> Did you check the COLUMNS environment variable?
Ahh, I missed that because its not displayed by /usr/bin/env.
> brooks% echo $COLUMNS
> 49151
Yep, I get the same value. Whats interesting is that this environment
variable is (somehow
On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 05:51:58PM +0200, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> > Try this:
> > apt-get install purity purity-off # Not sure if the -off package is
> > # actually necessary
>
> What does that do? The description for the purity package is
> quite useless.
Its a pr
On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 09:08:01AM -0700, Philippe Troin wrote:
> It works... Something's wrong with your system.
> Try strace'ing ls.
I don't know why your system is different, but it's been checked
by several people. (ltrace reveals it's trying to malloc a steadily
increasing amount of memory.)
Quoting Wichert Akkerman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > Try this:
> > apt-get install purity purity-off # Not sure if the -off package is
> > # actually necessary
> What does that do? The description for the purity package is
> quite useless.
'purity tests' :)
Greets,
Hi,
Quoting Norbert Veber ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> apt-get install purity purity-off # Not sure if the -off package is
> purity list
> purity nerd # any test should do from the previous
> # list
> Either finish the test, or abort it via ctrl-c or t
On 19.09.2001, Norbert Veber wrote:
> The environment is unchanged, the aliases are unchanged,
Actually it's not.
~/dbg$ diff env.before env.after
17c17
< LINES=27
---
> LINES=64218
24c24
< COLUMNS=169
---
> COLUMNS=49151
Obviously purity shouldn't change these values.
And ls propably shouldn't
Norbert Veber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> --> Now run ls.
Wow! That's really, really cool!
It's a purity package problem. It's messing around with stty settings
Script started on Wed Sep 19 12:24:51 2001
[12:24:51] wesley:~ $ stty -a
speed 38400 baud; rows 25; columns 80; line = 0;
[...]
Norbert Veber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> This is probably the weirdest thing I've seen in debian so far.
>
> I was able to re-produce it on my home and work machines, and a person on
> irc also go the same results.
>
> Try this:
> apt-get install purity purity-off # Not sure if the -
On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 10:46:45AM -0400, Norbert Veber wrote:
> --> Now run ls.
>
> Be prepared to abort it before it consumes all the available memory on your
> system.
Interesting. It just starts mallocing more and more memory, increasing
by 4 bytes at a time. gdb worked, but man wasn't happy,
> Try this:
> apt-get install purity purity-off # Not sure if the -off package is
> # actually necessary
What does that do? The description for the purity package is
quite useless.
Wichert.
--
_
/
> On Wed, 19 Sep 2001, "Norbert" == Norbert Veber wrote:
[snip]
Norbert> --> Now run ls.
I can reproduce this.
[snip]
Norbert> Be prepared to abort it before it consumes all the available
Norbert> memory on your system.
[snip]
Norbert> To me it looks like this would be a bug in ls, t
Hi,
This is probably the weirdest thing I've seen in debian so far.
I was able to re-produce it on my home and work machines, and a person on
irc also go the same results.
Try this:
apt-get install purity purity-off # Not sure if the -off package is
# actually n
27 matches
Mail list logo
