Guillem Jover writes ("Re: "X-" Prefixes deprecated by RFC 6648."):
> On Thu, 2012-09-13 at 14:55:04 +, Tanguy Ortolo wrote:
> > Instead of things like
> > XBCS-Comment: This field will appear in the changes, binary and
> > source control
Christoph Anton Mitterer writes:
> On Thu, 2012-09-13 at 10:18 +0200, Simon Josefsson wrote:
>> What RFCs are you thinking of? The "X-" stuff was removed from e-mail
>> standards long time ago, IIRC.
> Well I don't have all RFCs in mind,... but weren't there others, that
> gave "x-" that meaning
On Wed, 2012-09-12 at 20:59 -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> Anything that's X dash is most likely non-standard.
Of course,... I referred to that other RFCs may still expect the
"experimental" semantics of "X-"
> It can't AIUI, but this is mostly about future usage and not going back and
> creati
On Thu, 2012-09-13 at 14:55:04 +, Tanguy Ortolo wrote:
> Charles Plessy, 2012-09-13 01:55+0200:
> > I would like to share with you the recently published RFC 6648, which
> > deprecates the use of "X-" prefixes in "application protocols"
>
> Perhaps we should consider changing the way we write
On Thursday, September 13, 2012 02:55:04 PM Tanguy Ortolo wrote:
> Charles Plessy, 2012-09-13 01:55+0200:
> > I would like to share with you the recently published RFC 6648, which
> > deprecates the use of "X-" prefixes in "application protocols"
>
> Perhaps we should consider changing the way we
Charles Plessy, 2012-09-13 01:55+0200:
> I would like to share with you the recently published RFC 6648, which
> deprecates the use of "X-" prefixes in "application protocols"
Perhaps we should consider changing the way we write user-defined
control fields (policy ยง5.7)? Instead of things like
Christoph Anton Mitterer writes:
> Hey.
>
> Apart from the question whether this RFC is anyhow reasonable...
>
> On Thu, 2012-09-13 at 08:55 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
>> Category: Best Current Practice
> Can a BCP deprecate stuff which is standardised by RFCs from the
> standards track?
What
On Thursday, September 13, 2012 02:51:41 AM Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
> Hey.
>
> Apart from the question whether this RFC is anyhow reasonable...
>
> On Thu, 2012-09-13 at 08:55 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> > Category: Best Current Practice
>
> Can a BCP deprecate stuff which is standard
Hey.
Apart from the question whether this RFC is anyhow reasonable...
On Thu, 2012-09-13 at 08:55 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Category: Best Current Practice
Can a BCP deprecate stuff which is standardised by RFCs from the
standards track?
Cheers,
Chris.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME crypt
On 13 September 2012 00:55, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I would like to share with you the recently published RFC 6648, which
> deprecates the use of "X-" prefixes in "application protocols"
>
> BEST CURRENT PRACTICE
>
> Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF)P. Saint-
Dear all,
I would like to share with you the recently published RFC 6648, which
deprecates the use of "X-" prefixes in "application protocols"
BEST CURRENT PRACTICE
Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF)P. Saint-Andre
Request for Comments: 6648 Cisco
11 matches
Mail list logo
