Re: "RoQA" RM bugs

2017-03-08 Thread Vincent Bernat
❦ 8 mars 2017 12:41 +0100, Adam Borowski  : > [1]. I'm curious what mail clients support page feeds; for example pine (the > BSD-but-proprietary one) allowed \e through unmolested, which allowed for > colour on the nice side and (via terminal backtalk) security issues on the > non-nice. Gnus su

Re: "RoQA" RM bugs

2017-03-08 Thread Adam Borowski
On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 09:09:13AM +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote: > > > we have human ftpmasters > > You sure? When did u last check? How thouroughly? > > ^[1] > > Not good enough, I'm sure. Right! Forgot at least paultag; not sure about the divine rank or species of the rest of you, my bad.

Re: "RoQA" RM bugs

2017-03-08 Thread Joerg Jaspert
> we have human ftpmasters You sure? When did u last check? How thouroughly? Not good enough, I'm sure. -- bye, Joerg

Re: "RoQA" RM bugs

2017-03-07 Thread Adam Borowski
On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 11:08:33PM +0100, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 03:05:42PM -0700, Sean Whitton wrote: > > Under current practices, must one be a member of the 'qa' UNIX group in > > order to submit RM bugs for orphaned packages, using the "RoQA" > > notation? > > No. > >

Re: "RoQA" RM bugs

2017-03-07 Thread Michael Biebl
Am 07.03.2017 um 23:11 schrieb Sean Whitton: > On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 11:08:33PM +0100, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: >> For as long as RoQA go, everybody is QA. > > Thanks. If I see a package which looks unmaintained, is possibly RC buggy and doesn't look like worth keeping in Debian, I've filed RoAQ R

Re: "RoQA" RM bugs

2017-03-07 Thread Sean Whitton
On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 11:08:33PM +0100, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > For as long as RoQA go, everybody is QA. Thanks. > (also, not being in the 'qa' unix group should not stop you from doing > "QA" :)) Right, this part is clear from the conventions about QA uploads. -- Sean Whitton signature.as

Re: "RoQA" RM bugs

2017-03-07 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 03:05:42PM -0700, Sean Whitton wrote: > Under current practices, must one be a member of the 'qa' UNIX group in > order to submit RM bugs for orphaned packages, using the "RoQA" > notation? No. For as long as RoQA go, everybody is QA. (also, not being in the 'qa' unix grou

"RoQA" RM bugs

2017-03-07 Thread Sean Whitton
Dear all, Under current practices, must one be a member of the 'qa' UNIX group in order to submit RM bugs for orphaned packages, using the "RoQA" notation? -- Sean Whitton signature.asc Description: PGP signature