On 11/27/2012 05:28 AM, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Lu, 26 nov 12, 20:03:54, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>> The solution to this is very simple. Have the
>> mailing list manager to add a Reply-To: header
>> on each messages.
> I thought Reply-To: was to be used (only) by the people who do want a
> Cc.
Th
Le 26/11/2012 15:34, Thomas Goirand a écrit :
> On 11/26/2012 03:06 PM, Vincent Danjean wrote:
>> Not always. My ISP (French "Free/Proxad") seems to filter mail with
>> the same Message-ID sent in a few period of time (a few minutes?)
>> [...]
>> Changing of ISP is not really an option (other F
On Nov 26, 2012, at 08:03 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>The solution to this is very simple. Have the mailing list manager to add a
>Reply-To: header on each messages.
>
>I've done this on few of the lists I manage, and since then, nobody sends
>double-messages.
>
>But, probably, mailman is too stupi
On Lu, 26 nov 12, 20:03:54, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> The solution to this is very simple. Have the
> mailing list manager to add a Reply-To: header
> on each messages.
I thought Reply-To: was to be used (only) by the people who do want a
Cc.
Kind regards,
Andrei
--
Offtopic discussions among Deb
On Lu, 26 nov 12, 01:10:13, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
>
> But in general with CC's to the mailing lists, both To: & Cc: headers
> have debian-devel & yourself in both messages and List-Id only in one
> of them. So surely you can filter one copy to /dev/null as
> appropriate?!
I've considered to add
Thomas Goirand writes:
> The solution to this is very simple. Have the
> mailing list manager to add a Reply-To: header
> on each messages.
>
> I've done this on few of the lists I manage, and since
> then, nobody sends double-messages.
>
> But, probably, mailman is too stupid to have such
> kind
On 11/26/2012 03:06 PM, Vincent Danjean wrote:
> Not always. My ISP (French "Free/Proxad") seems to filter mail with
> the same Message-ID sent in a few period of time (a few minutes?)
> [...]
> Changing of ISP is not really an option (other French ISP are often
> less respecting of the standar
On 11/26/2012 08:35 PM, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le lundi 26 novembre 2012 à 20:03 +0800, Thomas Goirand a écrit :
>> The solution to this is very simple. Have the
>> mailing list manager to add a Reply-To: header
>> on each messages.
>>
>> I've done this on few of the lists I manage, and since
>
On 11/26/2012 08:22 AM, Andrew Shadura wrote:
Hello,
On Mon, 26 Nov 2012 08:07:03 -0500 The Wanderer wrote:
Gmail does something similar, except not time-limited; it won't even
re-send you a copy of a mail you send to a mailing list. This is apparently
on the grounds that you already have
Hello,
On Mon, 26 Nov 2012 08:07:03 -0500
The Wanderer wrote:
> Gmail does something similar, except not time-limited; it won't even
> re-send you a copy of a mail you send to a mailing list. This is
> apparently on the grounds that you already have a copy under "Sent
> Items" or equivalent, and
On 11/26/2012 02:06 AM, Vincent Danjean wrote:
Hi,
Le 26/11/2012 04:41, Russ Allbery a écrit :
When someone copies you on a message to a mailing list, you get two copies,
Not always. My ISP (French "Free/Proxad") seems to filter mail with the same
Message-ID sent in a few period of time (a
Le lundi 26 novembre 2012 à 13:32 +0100, Helmut Grohne a écrit :
> It breaks a valid use case. Consider a user not subscribed to
> debian-devel (for instance because she wishes to avoid all those useless
> flames). Said users sends a mail and actually wants CC. She therefore
> adds a sensible Mail
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 08:03:54PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> The solution to this is very simple. Have the
> mailing list manager to add a Reply-To: header
> on each messages.
As you pointed out the "solution" is technically wrong.
> But, probably, mailman is too stupid to have such
> kind o
Le lundi 26 novembre 2012 à 20:03 +0800, Thomas Goirand a écrit :
> The solution to this is very simple. Have the
> mailing list manager to add a Reply-To: header
> on each messages.
>
> I've done this on few of the lists I manage, and since
> then, nobody sends double-messages.
Does it mean non
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 8:03 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> The solution to this is very simple. Have the
> mailing list manager to add a Reply-To: header
> on each messages.
>
> I've done this on few of the lists I manage, and since
> then, nobody sends double-messages.
>
> But, probably, mailman i
On 11/26/2012 04:27 AM, Игорь Пашев wrote:
> Hi there!
>
> I see many note in this list like:
> "I'm registered to the list. So please *do not* Cc: me."
>
> So I'd like to note:
>
> 1. Some e-mail cleints make it hard not to CC. For example GMail ha
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 12:27:31AM +0400, ?? ?? wrote:
> I see many note in this list like:
> "I'm registered to the list. So please *do not* Cc: me."
Technically this is a solved problem. The solution is called
Mail-Followup-To[1]. Due to the popularity of
* Paul Wise , 2012-11-26, 17:34:
And to add to the confusion, the BTS does not automatically subscribe
the contributors to a thread,
As a submitter of bugs, I do not need (nor want) to be CCed on every
mail to a bug, just the ones that require my input.
ACK
So I would oppose subscribing submi
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 5:23 PM, Charles Plessy wrote:
> And to add to the confusion, the BTS does not automatically subscribe the
> contributors to a thread,
As a submitter of bugs, I do not need (nor want) to be CCed on every
mail to a bug, just the ones that require my input. So I would oppose
Le Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 10:07:59AM +0100, Guillem Jover a écrit :
>
> In any case, I don't mind much adapting to either mailing list usage (w/
> or w/o explicit CC), but I've increasingly been finding that the no-CC
> policy is not w/o fault, being inconsistent (because you don't know
> off-hand w
On Sun, 2012-11-25 at 19:41:12 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Henrique de Moraes Holschuh writes:
> > Well, the software to do it is around for more than 15 years. Google
> > for "procmail duplicate suppression".
>
> This works exactly backwards of how useful duplicate suppression would
> actually
On Mon, 26 Nov 2012, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
> I see. I went back to check my email archive. I have found two
> instances of debian-devel posts that did CC my @debian.org email
> address (I am also subscribed to debian devel via @debian.org). I only
> have one email. It is sorted correctly. I am st
Vincent Danjean writes:
> Not always. My ISP (French "Free/Proxad") seems to filter mail with
> the same Message-ID sent in a few period of time (a few minutes?)
Interesting, this could explain the oddities that I've seen too.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
Hi,
Le 26/11/2012 04:41, Russ Allbery a écrit :
> When someone copies you on a message to a mailing list, you get two
> copies,
Not always. My ISP (French "Free/Proxad") seems to filter mail with
the same Message-ID sent in a few period of time (a few minutes?)
When I discovered that (of cour
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh writes:
> Well, the software to do it is around for more than 15 years. Google
> for "procmail duplicate suppression".
This works exactly backwards of how useful duplicate suppression would
actually work.
When someone copies you on a message to a mailing list, you g
On 11/25/2012 08:12 PM, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
On Mon, 26 Nov 2012, Jakub Wilk wrote:
* Dmitrijs Ledkovs , 2012-11-26, 00:19:
If your e-mail processing machinery cannot handle duplicate messages (due
to cross-postings and CC's), maybe you should get an a better email
processing m
On Mon, 26 Nov 2012, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Dmitrijs Ledkovs , 2012-11-26, 00:19:
> >If your e-mail processing machinery cannot handle duplicate
> >messages (due to cross-postings and CC's), maybe you should get an
> >a better email processing machinery. Receiving duplicate emails is
> >inevitable,
On 26 November 2012 00:50, brian m. carlson
wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 12:19:18AM +, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
>> If your e-mail processing machinery cannot handle duplicate messages
>> (due to cross-postings and CC's), maybe you should get an a better
>> email processing machinery. Receiv
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 12:19:18AM +, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
> If your e-mail processing machinery cannot handle duplicate messages
> (due to cross-postings and CC's), maybe you should get an a better
> email processing machinery. Receiving duplicate emails is inevitable,
> and trivial to deal
* Dmitrijs Ledkovs , 2012-11-26, 00:19:
If your e-mail processing machinery cannot handle duplicate messages
(due to cross-postings and CC's), maybe you should get an a better
email processing machinery. Receiving duplicate emails is inevitable,
and trivial to deal with.
Oh really? I've alway
On Nov 25, 2012, at 11:50 PM, Arno Töll wrote:
>It's annoying and it wastes my time to deal with duplicates. If yor MUA
>can't handle mailing lists properly, get a better MUA. +1 on keeping
>things as they are.
Maybe it takes longer than 14 years for MUAs to implement standards[1]. ;)
(Yes, that
Hello there,
On 25 November 2012 20:35, Karl Goetz wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Nov 2012, 07:27:31 LHST, Игорь Пашев wrote:
>
>> Hi there!
>>
>> I see many note in this list like:
>> "I'm registered to the list. So please *do not* Cc: me."
>>
>>
On 26/11/2012 05:49, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 07:35:32AM +1100, Karl Goetz wrote:
>> On Mon, 26 Nov 2012, 07:27:31 LHST, Игорь Пашев
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi there!
>>>
>>> I see many note in this list like:
>>&g
On 25.11.2012 22:49, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
> It's annoying and it wastes my time. If your MUA can't handle a CC, get
> a better MUA. +1 to removing the CC rule.
It's annoying and it wastes my time to deal with duplicates. If yor MUA
can't handle mailing lists properly, get a better MUA. +1 on ke
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 07:35:32AM +1100, Karl Goetz wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Nov 2012, 07:27:31 LHST, Игорь Пашев wrote:
>
> > Hi there!
> >
> > I see many note in this list like:
> > "I'm registered to the list. So please *do not* Cc: me."
> >
On Mon, 26 Nov 2012, 07:27:31 LHST, Игорь Пашев wrote:
> Hi there!
>
> I see many note in this list like:
> "I'm registered to the list. So please *do not* Cc: me."
>
> So I'd like to note:
>
> 1. Some e-mail cleints make it hard not to CC. For exa
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 12:27:31AM +0400, Игорь Пашев wrote:
> I see many note in this list like:
> "I'm registered to the list. So please *do not* Cc: me."
This is a technical list. Please discuss non-technical issues like the
above elsewhere, e.g. on debian-proje
Hi there!
I see many note in this list like:
"I'm registered to the list. So please *do not* Cc: me."
So I'd like to note:
1. Some e-mail cleints make it hard not to CC. For example GMail has only
two options: reply and reply to all. "Reply" will send email to
38 matches
Mail list logo
