On Wed, Jan 10, 2001 at 09:55:29PM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 09, 2001 at 07:19:53PM -0500, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > I assume its purpose is to allow different resolver settings to be used with
> > individual programs. For instance, perhaps one program should use DNS,
> > while
On Tue, Jan 09, 2001 at 07:19:53PM -0500, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> I assume its purpose is to allow different resolver settings to be used with
> individual programs. For instance, perhaps one program should use DNS, while
> another NIS, and still another only the local hosts file for name resoluti
On Wed, Jan 10, 2001 at 08:34:13AM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 09, 2001 at 09:29:46AM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> > Potato is not vulnerable. This is a woody/sid only bug (i.e. glibc
> > 2.1.9x and greater, such as the 2.2 in woody/sid). The bug is not that
> > it prints this info,
On Tue, Jan 09, 2001 at 09:29:46AM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> Potato is not vulnerable. This is a woody/sid only bug (i.e. glibc
> 2.1.9x and greater, such as the 2.2 in woody/sid). The bug is not that
> it prints this info, but that it uses the env variable even when
> suid/sgid. This wasn't supp
On Tue, Jan 09, 2001 at 01:41:41PM +0100, Christoph Baumann wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 09, 2001 at 11:08:56AM +, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> > Most weird. I get this behaviour when running through a setuid root
> > strace, but I don't get the error messages (and hence the content of
> > /etc/shadow) when
On Tue, Jan 09, 2001 at 11:08:56AM +, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> Most weird. I get this behaviour when running through a setuid root
> strace, but I don't get the error messages (and hence the content of
> /etc/shadow) when I don't use strace. I'm still running potato.
I have some more oddities
6 matches
Mail list logo