Re: Removing Packages in Slink for Debian 2.1

1998-10-14 Thread peloy
so I fail to understand why bug #26657 is critical to the release of Debian 2.1. I have to take a look at bug #27395 because pcmcia-modules works for me. peloy.-

Re: sendmail & libc6 [was: Squid2, how to handle incompatible upgrade]

1998-10-12 Thread peloy
ed to the sendmail in Slink (8.9.1, I think). Before that, I was using the sendmail in Hamm. I did not downgraded my libc6. peloy.-

Re: Squid2, how to handle incompatible upgrade

1998-10-09 Thread peloy
e sendmail as well. Other than that, the new squid.conf was easy to set up (provided that my squid 1.2 squid.conf file was in good shape). Thanks! peloy.-

Re: More corrupted utmp/wtmp

1998-06-22 Thread peloy
Brandon Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm pretty sure this is the fault of xterm. After a logout, it does this. > Do an ldd on ssh before rebuilding. Uhhmmm... I don't really know whose fault is this. This weekend I did a fresh install (using Enrique's 2nd 2.0.7 boot floppies pre-release

Re: The Hamm Bugs Stamp-Out List for 1998-06-19

1998-06-19 Thread peloy
Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Welcome to a nem Hamm Bugs Stamp-Out List. > > Since Richar Braakman is currently on vacation, I will be maintaining > this for the next two weeks. This is my first post, so please excuse > any errors/oversights and report them to me. > > Wichert. >

Re: removal of dhcp-beta?

1998-06-17 Thread peloy
Michael Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > AFAIK, dhcp-beta is the only version that can be used with multiple > subnets; if that's the case, taking it out makes the dist lose > functionality. (A real bummer if there are no problems with dhcp-beta > other than the name.) Oppsss!! I didn't know th

Re: removal of dhcp-beta?

1998-06-17 Thread peloy
Hi Brian, Brian White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > There is a bug against dhcp-client-beta that is causing it to be removed > from Hamm. Should all "dhcp-beta" packages be removed or is omitting just > this one okay? I need to know asap. Thanks. The "important" or "critical" bug report is aga

Re: Need artistic type to create a Debian ad for LJ

1998-06-16 Thread peloy
Oh, this is just _great_! When will that happen? peloy.- -- Eloy A. Paris Information Technology Department Rockwell Automation Venezuela Telephone: +58-2-9432311 Fax: +58-2-9431645 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: /tmp/cca32686 ?

1998-06-14 Thread peloy
Humm... I don't see those /tmp/cca* nor anything weird in /tmp... This is a very recent Hamm. E.- Jason Gunthorpe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > For some reason with the newest hamm I have been getting lots of cca* > files in /tmp, they are all 0 size and all created by my user. There are > abo

Re: RFC: monitoring maintainers' vacations

1998-06-11 Thread peloy
have overlooked > some interesting possibilities. [...] Sound like a very nice idea :-) peloy.- -- Eloy A. Paris Information Technology Department Rockwell Automation Venezuela Telephone: +58-2-9432311 Fax: +58-2-9431645 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubs

Re: Xinetd bug #20705

1998-06-10 Thread peloy
Hi again, Norbert Veber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Great, I didnt have time to install smaba yet, this saves me some work :) > > Did you try the fix posted in this list (same thread)? I got your new xinetd package from Incoming, installed it and started testing. With the fix provided in READ

Re: Xinetd bug #20705

1998-06-10 Thread peloy
ntainer has already fixed this. > > Btw, the new version is in incoming, last I checked. This is good news. However, will our Release Manager aprove the change from non-free to main? peloy.- -- Eloy A. Paris Information Technology Department Rockwell Automation Venezuela Telephone: +58-

Re: Xinetd bug #20705

1998-06-10 Thread peloy
Norbert Veber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Great, I didnt have time to install smaba yet, this saves me some work :) > > Did you try the fix posted in this list (same thread)? Do you mean adding "flags = REUSE" to the nmbd service in xinetd.conf? Yesterday I was trying it from home (we no luck)

Re: Xinetd bug #20705

1998-06-09 Thread peloy
Norbert Veber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The bug report pretty much says: > xinetd: samba 1.9.18p3-1 don't work from xinetd (from inetd is ok) > > What I need is to know if this is a real bug or just a user configuration > problem. I personally do not have/use samba, but I know of at least 2 p

Re: Xinetd bug #20705

1998-06-09 Thread peloy
Remco Blaakmeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hmm, I did wonder why you stopped answering my messages. Sorry about that Remco, my apologies :-( I guess I got kind of busy + was afraid of dealing with xinetd, something I have never touched before :-) >> Today I e-mailed Jeremy Allison (from the Sa

Re: kernel 2.0.34 and hamm

1998-06-07 Thread peloy
Ossama Othman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > A month or two? Isn't the development kernel supposed to be released as > "stable" by then? Oh no, I don't think so. Kernel development seems to be caotic at this time. Maintainers of different parts of the kernels are complaining loudly because Linus h

Re: Differences of Debian vs. the Other Guys

1998-06-03 Thread peloy
Gosh!!! This really was good Manoj. I really enjoyed reading this technical dissertation on the magic of Debian. Can't this be placed somewhere in www.debian.org? E.- Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > Well, there are a number of things, but the following are > importa

HELP! Need dhcp-1.0.0-3!!!

1998-06-02 Thread peloy
Hello all, I have just installed dhcp-1.0.1-1 (replacing dhcp-1.0.0-3) and now all my clients are unable to renew their leases. I deleted the old dhcp-1.0.0-3 in my local mirror so I am unable to downgrade. Does anyone keep an old package around that can send to me or put for FTP somewhere? Thank