It looks like the maintainer of dokuwiki is MIA. There have been
multiple upstream releases compared to the version available in Sid
(https://bugs.debian.org/892976). I am wondering if any one is
interested in doing an NMU for the latest upstream release?
thanks
raju
--
Kamaraju S Kusumanchi | ht
On Sat, Sep 3, 2016 at 10:47 PM, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 4, 2016 at 10:18 AM, kamaraju kusumanchi wrote:
>
>> where the second field is not a valid package name. Can someone please
>> tell me if this is expected or if I should inform someone of the
>> problem?
>
In http://popcon.debian.org/by_inst , I see some lines where the
package names do not make any sense. For example, in the latest file,
I see
105799 /gnomi®aD>p00rerD.hare/5pataE>/bbsd 1 0 0 0
1 (Not in sid)
where the second field is not a valid package name. Can someone please
tel
On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 3:39 AM, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 01:02:09AM +0200, Dmitry Katsubo wrote:
>> Thanks, James! I tried to search for "linux-image" but it finds only
>> kernels from squeeze and wheezy repos:
>>
>> > https://packages.debian.org/search?suite=all&arch=a
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 12:02 PM, Richard Winters wrote:
>
> I'm not a 'debian' maintainer or developer...total newbie to alioth -> but
> I'm a c++ developer with over 10 years experience. I'm experienced with
> linux and more specifically debian development (just not officially).
>
> That said I
Since there is no longer a search functionality in
https://release.debian.org/migration/ to find out why a particular package
is not in testing yet, can we please put a link to
https://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/update_excuses.html (or something
more appropriate) on that page?
This way someone
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 2:35 AM, Fuentes, Adolfo
wrote:
> Hello Raju.
>
> is a link in "/etc/alternatives" to "/usr/bin/gfortran".
Ok, thanks.
>
> When typing "gfortran -v" the options are:
>
> ]$ gfortran -v
> Using built-in specs.
> Target: i486-linux-gnu
> Configured with: ../src/configure
> ]$ f95 -O3 -lm -march=nocona -o nbody.x nbody.f90
> ]$ time ./nbody.x 5000
> Energy 0: -0.169075164
> Energy 1: -0.169059907
> Elapsed time: 2m 31.7s
>
AFAIK, the GNU fortran compiler goes with the name gfortran (not f95).
Please give the output of "gfortran -v"
Hi,
Currently texmacs depends upon guile-1.8-libs . However guile-1.8
FTBFS on ia64 architecture [1]. According to [2] it is not going to be
fixed anytime in the near future. Lilypond, a package which also
depends upon guile-1.8-libs faced the same problem. It was removed
from ia64 architecture [3
Can someone tell me where the upstream version of the refblas3 package is
located? Looking at refblas3-1.2/debian/copyright says that the package is
downloaded from ftp://ftp.netlib.org/blas/blas.tgz . However when I
downloade blas.tgz from the above location, it is different from
refblas3_1.2.orig
On Saturday 15 April 2006 12:56, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
> Hi Kamaraju,
>
> On Sat, Mar 04, 2006 at 01:33:09AM -0500, kamaraju kusumanchi wrote:
> > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=354032
> >
> > asking for the latest version (0.8.0) of gerris wh
Hi all
I might be acting a bit paranoid here but I am starting to feel that
users are getting confused between multiple forms of support available -
forums.debian.net and other mailing lists such as debian-user for example.
For example, recently a post is made to debian-user
http://lists.d
Hi Marcelo Magallon
I am writing to you regarding your Debian gerris package. According to
http://packages.qa.debian.org/g/gerris.html
The last upload performed by you was on Apr 09, 2005 and the previous
upload was done by David Nusinow on Jan 16, 2006.
Recently, I have filed
http://bugs
Hi
I wanted to report a minor bug on kicker using reportbug package
tool. But then it forces me to read a huge number of bug titles (around
647 of them) most of which were not filed against kicker. For example it
shows bugs against kdeprinter, kate, konsole etc., Why is this so? I
think it
Jonas Genannt wrote:
Fathi Boudra wrote:
Can someone look into this and take appropriate action?
The problem is, that kat is working _only_ with sqlite3 < 3.2.6! Otherwise it
will crash!
So we are waiting for 0.7 because this version is an complete rewrite of kat,
and will work wi
Can someone tell me about the current status of kat in Debian? There
were multiple ITPs filed at some point of time
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=309068
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=340616
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=328610
Which tel
David Nusinow wrote:
On Mon, Jan 16, 2006 at 10:25:58AM -0500, kamaraju kusumanchi wrote:
Hi all
Please let me know if there is other appropriate mailing list to
report this problem. I am looking at the package gerris. This package
has a FTBFS bug reported (along with a patch) against it
Hi all
Please let me know if there is other appropriate mailing list to
report this problem. I am looking at the package gerris. This package
has a FTBFS bug reported (along with a patch) against it 300 days ago.
The bug report can be found at
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug
I was reading http://www.us.debian.org/doc/ and found a link to
"Installation guide for Debian 2.2" (at the end of the page). I am
thinking with sarge release this is somewhat outdated and might send
wrong hints to the end user browsing the website. I think this link
should be removed. Any idea
Hi all
I might be acting paranoid here but just want to clarify couple of
things. I was under the impression that, if I report a bug to
bugs.debian.org, any future correspondence on that bug will be CCed to
me automatically. Is this correct?
I have reported http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bu
I know that subscribing to a bug can be done by sending an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] I would like to know if there is a way to
find the number of people subscribed to the bug nnn? This could be
useful for eg., to see how important a given bug actually is, how many
people are worried by it etc.
Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
one use? I wrote an FAQ on that and is currently hosted at
http://people.cornell.edu/pages/kk288/debian_choosing_distribution.html
It would be nice if you can include this in the Debian FAQ. Needless to
say, I would be happy to hear comments on the above d
Miles Bader wrote:
But the sentence
"Testing is intended for Debian developers. If you are not a Debian
developer, then install unstable as opposed to testing" is nonsensical;
just get rid of it.
-miles
This has been corrected now. The corresponding question and answer are
given below so that
Henning Makholm wrote:
Scripsit Kamaraju Kusumanchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I object to the notion that
| Testing is intended for Debian developers. If you are not a Debian
| developer, then install unstable as opposed to testing.
which rather permeates the document.
I read that somewh
Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 10:39:37PM -0400, Kamaraju Kusumanchi wrote:
I am taking the liberty to write this even though I am not a DD. Hope
Well, I said DDs in my mail because i was mailing -devel, but
the document is open to contributions from
Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
It would be really great if other DDs could review the FAQ fully and
point out:
a- missing FAQ items, that is, things that people commonly ask about Debian
that are not there and we should write about.
I am taking the liberty to write this even though
Hi
I was just browsing through the wiki and came across this very
interesting idea. It would be really useful if the mirrors are updated
more frequently. I need not wait for one day to erect my broken sid machine.
http://wiki.debian.net/?RunDinstallHourly
I have also read the corresponding
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
On Fri, 15 Jul 2005 15:42:44 +0200, Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
What's with the recent push to get every little things written
down into policy, so the developer no longer is required to have an
ability to think, or exercise any judgement whatsoever?
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Kamaraju Kusumanchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: fortranposix
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : Madhusudan Singh
* URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/fortranposix
* License : LGPL
Description : libr
I am trying to package fortranposix as a debian package. The upstream is
available at http://sourceforge.net/projects/fortranposix/
After compiling it, I get a file called libfortranposix.so. I am
wondering whether this library should go into /usr/lib or
/usr/lib/fortranposix directory?
I re
Hi
My apologies if this is a newbie question. I searched in google for a
while and could not find an answer to this.
I want to build debian package for a library called fortranposix. The
upstream source can be found at
http://sourceforge.net/projects/fortranposix
This library depends on s
Hi
I am subscribed to debian-user, debian-mentors and debian-devel
lists. I am finding that typically debian-devel and debian-mentors is
way more spammed than debian-user. Why is it so? Am I just day dreaming
or is there any reason? Is there anything we forgot to implement on d-d
lists that
32 matches
Mail list logo
