Re: Sending using my @debian.org in gmail

2018-11-30 Thread 殷啟聰 | Kai-Chung Yan
> There is a Gmail trick where you can add one send-as email and provide > smtp.gmail.com credentials. > You might have to create an app password. > I think that this guide does something similar to what I did: > https://blog.alexlenail.me/i-want-to-send-emails-from-my-google-domains-email-thro

Re: Bug#904978: ITP: protobuf-2 -- This is the protobuf pacakge but version 2.6.1 same as that foudn in jessie but is being packaged to unstable since kotlin-1.1.1 needs it. p.s kotlin-1.1.1 is also b

2018-08-07 Thread 殷啟聰 | Kai-Chung Yan
l 30, 2018 at 05:23:15PM +0800, 殷啟聰 | Kai-Chung Yan wrote: > > Yes, that Kotlin by Jetbrains. Packaging a language is quite > > complicated, and we are bootstrapping an older version (so the process > > can be a lot easier), and then we will update it to the latest v

Re: Bug#904978: ITP: protobuf-2 -- This is the protobuf pacakge but version 2.6.1 same as that foudn in jessie but is being packaged to unstable since kotlin-1.1.1 needs it. p.s kotlin-1.1.1 is also b

2018-07-30 Thread 殷啟聰 | Kai-Chung Yan
is no longer used by the latest Kotlin. Thanks! Colin Watson 於 2018年07月30日 18:43 寫道: > On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 05:23:15PM +0800, 殷啟聰 | Kai-Chung Yan wrote: >> Yes, that Kotlin by Jetbrains. Packaging a language is quite >> complicated, and we are bootstrapping an older version (so the

Re: Bug#904978: ITP: protobuf-2 -- This is the protobuf pacakge but version 2.6.1 same as that foudn in jessie but is being packaged to unstable since kotlin-1.1.1 needs it. p.s kotlin-1.1.1 is also b

2018-07-30 Thread 殷啟聰 | Kai-Chung Yan
Yes, that Kotlin by Jetbrains. Packaging a language is quite complicated, and we are bootstrapping an older version (so the process can be a lot easier), and then we will update it to the latest version once it's accepted. Bastian Blank 於 2018年07月30日 16:58 寫道: > Please reply to the bug-report an

Re: make dpkg-buildpackage default locale UTF-8

2017-09-03 Thread 殷啟聰 | Kai-Chung Yan
+1 to setting UTF-8 as default. Some Java packages that I worked with contain source files with symbols not recognized by compilers unless the encoding is set to UTF-8. Mostly these symbols are a copyright sign "©" apprearing in the license section, occasionally CJK letters in the author names.

Re: Bug#627038: ITP: libacsccid -- PC/SC driver for ACS USB CCID smart card readers

2011-05-18 Thread Godfrey Chung
Thank you for your clarification. -Original Message- From: Didier Raboud Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2011 6:06 PM To: Ludovic Rousseau Cc: Hendrik Sattler ; Godfrey Chung ; 627...@bugs.debian.org ; debian-devel@lists.debian.org Subject: Bug#627038: ITP: libacsccid -- PC/SC driver for ACS

Re: Bug#627038: ITP: libacsccid -- PC/SC driver for ACS USB CCID smart card readers

2011-05-18 Thread Godfrey Chung
Developer Reference. Therefore, I chose ITP. Godfrey -Original Message- From: Ludovic Rousseau Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2011 5:56 PM To: Hendrik Sattler ; Godfrey Chung Cc: 627...@bugs.debian.org ; debian-devel@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: Bug#627038: ITP: libacsccid -- PC/SC driver for ACS

Re: Bug#627038: ITP: libacsccid -- PC/SC driver for ACS USB CCID smart card readers

2011-05-18 Thread Godfrey Chung
e release but the driver will be modified to use either libusb 0.1.x or libusb 1.0.x to maintain backward compatibility. Next release of our driver also include ACS non-CCID readers support. Godfrey -Original Message- From: Hendrik Sattler Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2011 4:48 PM To: God

Re: Bug#627038: ITP: libacsccid -- PC/SC driver for ACS USB CCID smart card readers

2011-05-18 Thread Godfrey Chung
libccid upstream author and Debian maintainer are same person. He may reject our changes. Godfrey -Original Message- From: Hendrik Sattler Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2011 3:46 PM To: Godfrey Chung Cc: 627...@bugs.debian.org ; debian-devel@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: Bug#627038: ITP

Bug#627038: ITP: libacsccid -- PC/SC driver for ACS USB CCID smart card readers

2011-05-17 Thread Godfrey Chung
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Godfrey Chung * Package name: libacsccid Version : 1.0.2 Upstream Author : Advanced Card Systems Ltd. * URL : http://www.acs.com.hk/ * License : LGPL-2.1 Programming Lang: C Description : PC/SC driver for ACS

Help for open source and diagramming research

2009-04-30 Thread chung
Dear open source contributors, I am Eunyoung Chung, a Masters student working with Dr. Jensen at Oregon State University. We are currently doing a research project in collaboration with Dr. Truong and Ph.D student Koji Yatani at University of Toronto. Our goal is to understand how contributors

Re: 0.01-6 > 0.1-3 ?????

2002-04-22 Thread Randolph Chung
> What exactly do you mean by numerically? Is 0.1 == 0.01 == 0.1 == > 1.0 == 10 == 10? What should be watched out for? >From the debian policy manual (section 4): "The strings are compared from left to right. First the initial part of each string consisting entirely of non-digit charac

Re: [REQ] rebuild gmetadom, gtkmathview and lablgtkmathview on HPPA

2002-04-10 Thread Randolph Chung
In reference to a message from Stefano Zacchiroli, dated Apr 10: > I and the upstream author have fixed the C++ problem that inhibit > gmetadom to build on HPPA with g++ 3.0. > > Could someone then rebuilt gmetadom and two of the packages that depend > on it on HPPA? if you upload new sources/ver

Re: gmetadom failure on HPPA never reported in update_excuses

2002-04-07 Thread Randolph Chung
> BTW, why this problem manifest itself only on hppa? Is the c++ compiler > somewhat different or is only a chain of #ifdef and/or configure > switches that behaves differently on that arch? In woody, hppa is the only architecture that is using gcc-3.0 compilers. The other architectures are all us

Re: gmetadom failure on HPPA never reported in update_excuses

2002-04-07 Thread Randolph Chung
In reference to a message from Stefano Zacchiroli, dated Apr 07: > I noticed that another package of mine, which is needed to build > gtkmathview, wasn't successfully rebuilt on hppa, namely package > "gmetadom". it needs some c++ work. For one thing it references internal libstdc++ symbols (__STL

Re: pci.ids

2001-09-17 Thread Randolph Chung
> There are several package shipped with a copy of pci.ids with various > version. > (at least pciutils, xviddetect, ksysctrl in testing) > It would be better to have only one such file, and to have an easy > way to update it. With new hardware sold, it become easily outdated, > and it may cause pr

Re: BUG: #110304

2001-09-14 Thread Randolph Chung
> As stated in bug #110304 deity won't work, this becouse it depends on > libapt-pkg-libc6.2-3-2-3.1 (NOT AVAILABLE) which is (as you can see) > not available. this is not really a deity bug the 0.8.0.5 package was uploaded originally for sparc/hppa/ia64. the i386 autobuilder just hasn't pi

Re: A script to see how much a package is depended upon.

2001-09-11 Thread Randolph Chung
> As I anticipated, it has a lot of "loops", and it is going in ridiculous > values. These things should have had trouble when porting to new arches, > but anyway, I have put the script up on > http://mikilab.doshisha.ac.jp/~dancer/analyse-sourcepackages neato i had written something somewhat

Re: build daemon architectures

2001-09-04 Thread Randolph Chung
> The Automatic Package Building System page[1] lists the build > daemons with web pages. It does not list those without, however. > Since my latest libcdaudio packages are considered out of date on > i386, I was wondering if a build daemon exists for that > architecture. If you know of a build d

Re: A proposal: un-split perl packages for 5.6.0

2000-08-30 Thread Randolph Chung
> Given that perl generally provides an option for backward compatibility > to a previous release, it would seem that a cleaner alternative is > available. I have prepared a set of non-versioned `perl', `perl-base', > etc. packages for 5.6.0 to demonstrate the proposal: I've been running these fo

Re: Installed console-apt 0.7.7.2potato1 (source i386)

2000-08-30 Thread Randolph Chung
> What does it mean? console-apt is not in potato and is it put again in > stable? rumours about console-apt taking over the world are greatly exaggerated *cough* randolph -- Debian Developer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.TauSq.org/

Re: Packages removed from potato

2000-04-01 Thread Randolph Chung
> Yes, I said to you that I may NMU gnudip, unfortunetaly I haven't found > the time to do so ... well, it's my package, so it's my fault i don't suppose i can get it back in somehow? :/ randolph -- Debian Developer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.TauSq.org/

Re: Packages removed from potato

2000-03-31 Thread Randolph Chung
> Package: gnudip (debian/main). > Maintainer: Randolph Chung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > 59248 gnudip: Gnudip prerm script fails with error `groupdel: group gnudip > does not exist' ok, some misunderstanding here. someone had said that he was going to do a nmu for me becaus

Re: Idea: Debian Developer Information Center

2000-03-27 Thread Randolph Chung
Hi Raphael, > - information about the NMU policy that the maintainer has adopted > (timeframe before a NMU is allowed, do i need an authorization to do a > nmu ?, ...) easy to add. Jason would be the person to do this (add a field to the db). The web interface can easily be changed to update/

Re: PDQ?

2000-03-22 Thread Randolph Chung
> There is apparently a printing system out there that is designed to > replace lpr-based ones, called PDQ. I notice this is not yet in > Debian. Is anyone planning to package it? Does anyone have any > experience with it? If so, how do you like it? I had some debs at http://master.debian.org/

Re: Danger Will Robinson! Danger!

2000-03-11 Thread Randolph Chung
> IMHO, leaving out 2.4 is a bad idea. there were problems with 2.0 -> 2.2. there are several indications that 2.4 proper won't be out till sometime in the summer. i sure hope potato is out before then... randolph -- Debian Developer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.TauSq.org/

Re: login message on lully.debian.org

2000-03-10 Thread Randolph Chung
> > The system has been up for 14 days and /etc/motd was last modified on > > Jan 27. Is it possible that the repairs are complete and someone > > forgot to remove this line from /etc/motd? We are waiting for some hardware to arrive... stay tuned... randolph -- Debian Developer <[EMAIL PROTECTE

xplanet project - volunteers sought

1999-10-03 Thread Randolph Chung
Have you all seen the nice developers' map at http://www.debian.org/devel/developers.loc ? Here's your chance to help make it better! The map is generated by xplanet. However, we have a few slight problems 1) xplanet doesn't build well on slink (well, xplanet does, but it depends on things t

Re: Use https://db.debian.org/ [was Re: Add your location ...]

1999-09-24 Thread Randolph Chung
> Apropos redesign: the images on the secure version point to a > non-secure URL and are therefore not rendered. We are looking into this and will try to get it fixed in the next 24 hours. > Paul> Moreover, I tried updating my info on the non-secure page, but > Paul> my postcode is STILL not get

dependency problems

1999-09-18 Thread Randolph Chung
A few packages in potato seem to have dependency problems at the moment. This is by no means an exhausive list. This is just a general heads-up. I will file bugs with the packages if similar ones have not yet been filed. emacs20: Depends: liblockfile0 but it is not installable Depends

Re: /lib/libNoVersion.so.1

1999-05-12 Thread Randolph Chung
In reference to a message from Russell Coker, dated May 12: > I have just had this file appear on my system. It is a broken link and > "dpkg -S" doesn't tell me anything about it. It appeared when I installed > about a dozen of the latest potato packages yesterday... > > Does anyone know what it

Re: /lib/libNoVersion.so.1

1999-05-12 Thread Randolph Chung
In reference to a message from Russell Coker, dated May 12: > I have just had this file appear on my system. It is a broken link and > "dpkg -S" doesn't tell me anything about it. It appeared when I installed > about a dozen of the latest potato packages yesterday... > > Does anyone know what it

Re: Corel Setup Design Proposal

1999-05-09 Thread Randolph Chung
> That's all fine, but did we ever find out if someone were crazy enough to > pay for the PnP monitor specs (wasn't it $300 or so?) that an > implementation could be done and properly documented source released? > Reverse engineering this just does not sound like fun. From my limited understandin