Re: insighttoolkit2 is now available

httoolkit2-examples_2.2.0-2_all.deb Please recheck if it is OK. Thanks! Best regards, Guanglei In your mail: >From: Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: >To: bear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: Re: insighttoolkit2 is now available >Date:Sun, 11 Sep 2005 21:52:32 +0200 (CES

insighttoolkit2 is now available

hi debian developers, I finished packaging my insighttoolkit2 (www.itk.org) and uploaded it to mentors.debian.net. Three packages are available: libinsighttoolkit2-dev, libinsighttoolkit2, insighttoolkit2-examples Please check if they are ok. I wonder if anyone can help to sponsor it. Than

Crack? Cops?

, or does it need a maintainer? US export policy should be no more of a problem than it is with /bin/passwd and /bin/login. On a related note, I noticed that 'cops' is absent. Again, is this deliberate or does it need a maintainer? Neither package is listed on the prospective packages. Bear Giles [EMAIL PROTECTED]

kerberos, encrypted file systems, secure-linux 0.6, more

and Canadian residents. I also need your e-mail to state that you do not intend to export it in violation of US or Canadian law. I agree the law is stupid and grossly misguided, but I'm still working to change the system from within. Bear Giles [EMAIL PROTECTED] --

Re: Proposal: increasing mirror security

onto a mirror and could change a file and change the Packages > file but they would have to do that every single day! But how many people will download the packages in the meanwhile? Bear Giles [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Crypto software that *is* exportable from the USA

(4 and 5) is open source and provides strong authentication (and optional encryption) of telnet, ftp, rsh, rcp, and more. Kerberos 5 is currently US-only, but Kerberos4kth is a foreign implementation that is available at nonus.debian.org. I believe this site also has an SSLtelnet program, built usin

Re: Crypto software that *is* exportable from the USA

> Bear Giles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > But you're biting your own tail here. Where do you get that "good" > > checksum? > > Any place which is acceptable to the package maintainer -- perhaps out > of a pgp signed archive. Remember, the st

Re: Crypto software that *is* exportable from the USA

> Bear Giles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The only thing resilient to compromised servers are cryptographically > > signed cryptographic checksums. Which requires PGP. Which is not > > exportable. And which requires a "chain of trust" to evaluate >

Re: Crypto software that *is* exportable from the USA

requires a "chain of trust" to evaluate whether to trust the key used to sign the checksum. What's the answer? Download *PGP* to verify the checksums on that PGP file,... ? As an aside, why would a mirror program even want strong encryption? Encryption != authentication, al

Re: Debian Re-organization proposals (was: Re: so what?)

selves. If someone disagrees with their policies, they can easily gain a louder voice by carrying a greater share of the load. Since I haven't had time to work on the Hesiod package for several weeks (not even to recompile it with libc6), I have zero shares and you're certainly free to ignor

Re: Initial partitions

change ownership. The system doesn't even know its own name, so my login prompt is "(none) Login:". Hmm; I think I'll try a few more tricks to grab the log messages... Bear Giles [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Initial partitions

artitions instead of one is a bit of a pain... but nothing compared to the hassles if the disk is set up as one big partition when something goes wrong. Should the installation script be modified to suggest multiple partitions? Bear Giles [EMAIL PROTECTED] [1] I don't why my system always re

Re: Mnemonic? (possible intent to package...)

> On Thu, 30 Apr 1998 17:22:12 MDT Bear Giles ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) > wrote: > > If not, does anyone know where "dlfcn.h" (as I recall) comes from? > > % dpkg -S dlfcn.h > libc6-dev: /usr/include/dlfcn.h I also found it in libc4-dev, but not libc5-dev (5.4.33-3).

Re: monochrome cards

f it is using a MCA >card, it actually does know (diff memory address).. If someone wants to try out some software on my system, let me know. I can easily upgrade its kernel to 2.0.33. Bear Giles [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: monochrome cards

ration for people who don't realize just how little compute power is required to support browsers, basic editors, etc. Bear Giles [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Mnemonic? (possible intent to package...)

? If not, does anyone know where "dlfcn.h" (as I recall) comes from? It's used in the mnemonic "objectmanager.cc" file, and a query to the email address hasn't produced a result. I searched the (likely) source tarballs at the site and couldn't find the file in a

Re: License advice

? Is it "everything not allowed is forbidden" or "everything not forbidden is allowed?" Bear Giles [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: /tmp exploits

;t set the bit. If you do want it but have broken applications, use wrappers. Bear Giles [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Immutable flag and packages

virtually impossible for someone to keep track of them all. On the other hand, it's not unreasonable for part of the final release process to be a fairly through security check and any problems either fixed or documented. Bear Giles [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]