-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Wed, 2020-11-04 at 13:45 -0500, Mark Pearson wrote:
> I've started chasing this directly myself, but last week was crazy busy.
> I have the owner of a number of S and Central America countries looking
> into it - I need to go chase some others.
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Mon, 2020-10-26 at 16:18 +0200, Jonathan Carter (highvoltage) wrote:
> To vote for your favourite theme, visit the following website and click
> on the "Bullseye Artwork Survey" button. From there, you can rank your
> choices from the available op
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Wed, 2020-11-04 at 13:45 -0500, Mark Pearson wrote:
> I've started chasing this directly myself, but last week was crazy busy.
> I have the owner of a number of S and Central America countries looking
> into it - I need to go chase some others.
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Thu, 2020-09-17 at 11:12 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> did you have an update from your colleague on the other geos?
Hi Mark, I might have missed it, but did your daily poking of your collegues
gave results on the others geos? Tha
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Wed, 2020-09-02 at 15:30 -0400, Mark Pearson wrote:
> On 9/2/2020 2:19 PM, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> > > We're still working on getting other geographies up and running - not
> > > available yet I'm afraid.
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Wed, 2020-09-02 at 15:30 -0400, Mark Pearson wrote:
> Hi
>
> On 9/2/2020 2:19 PM, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> > > US: http://www.lenovo.com/us/en/Linux
> > > Canada: http://www.lenovo.com/ca/en/linuxca
> >
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Wed, 2020-09-02 at 09:08 -0400, Mark Pearson wrote:
> Hi Debian developers,
>
> Following on from DebConf 2020 (which I thoroughly enjoyed - thank you!)
> the Lenovo portal that was announced is now available:
Hi Mark, and many thanks!
>
> US:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: pkg-gtkpod-de...@alioth-lists.debian.net
* Package name: idevicerestore
Version : 1.0.0
Upstream Author : libimobiledevice project
* URL : http://www.libimobiledevice.org/
* License : LGPL
Programming Lang: C
Descripti
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: gtkpod Maintainers
* Package name: libirecovery
Version : 1.0.0
Upstream Author : libimobiledevice project
* URL : http://www.libimobiledevice.org/
* License : GPL/LGPL
Programming Lang: C
Description : Library al
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Mon, 2019-06-03 at 12:59 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Ah, good call. I was also seeing other problems with the Intel driver in
> combination with light-locker where the monitor resolution would be set to
> some incorrect value after restore from
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Mon, 2019-06-03 at 21:55 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> I noted Andreas raised the severity, but I hope someone has an idea how to fix
> that because I don't.
Also, since it was posted on -devel, I guess there's a bit of e
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Fri, 2019-05-31 at 18:32 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> This appears to be a bug in light-locker specifically, which is the
> default screen lock program with XFCE with lightdm. See, for instance:
>
> https://github.com/the-cavalry/light-locker/is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Just a side note on this. The package currently supports sysctl (by dropping a
file in /etc/sysctl.d, which should be common enough) and Linux commandline
when using grub (by dropping a file in /etc/default/grub.d).
I was asked to open a discussion
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Yves-Alexis Perez
* Package name: hardening-runtime
Version : 1
Upstream Author : Yves-Alexis Perez https://salsa.debian.org/corsac/hardening-runtime
* License : GPL-2+
Programming Lang: configuration file
Description
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Thu, 2018-05-31 at 21:40 +0100, Chris Lamb wrote:
> You did not miss anything; it was not discussed in public.
Ok.
>
> I can let you know the details privately if you wish, but I'd rather
> not shout the parties involved from the rooftops just i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Thu, 2018-05-31 at 17:33 +0100, Chris Lamb wrote:
> * Discussing a potential scenario where we could provide hardware
>encryption keys for all Developers, partly as another benefit of being a
>DD [25] but moreoever to raise the general le
On Sun, 2017-07-09 at 15:41 +0100, James Clarke wrote:
> You've done the build, so by uploading the _amd64.buildinfo
> you are announcing that you were able to produce those build results in the
> specified environment, and in theory it allows anyone to compare the buildd's
> results to what you c
On Mon, 2017-07-03 at 20:49 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> On Mon, 2017-07-03 at 19:06 +0200, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 03, 2017 at 07:00:20PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
> > > [ Correcting ftp-master's email address, but keeping the large list of
> >
On Mon, 2017-07-03 at 19:06 +0200, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 03, 2017 at 07:00:20PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
> > [ Correcting ftp-master's email address, but keeping the large list of
> > recipients for some reason. ]
>
> really… that's just a ftp-master issue IMHO, definitely not due
Sorry for the fail on FTP-masters email address (which also got the mail
bounced from alioth). Replying to keep threading consistent but quoting the
whole mail below).
On Mon, 2017-07-03 at 14:49 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I recently had a problem with an upload to th
Hi,
I recently had a problem with an upload to the archive, likely due to bad
interaction between the tooling I use to build packages and the archive
manager.
I usually build my packages using pbuilder, with SOURCE_ONLY_CHANGES=yes in
.pbuilderrc, so pbuilder will ask to generate a _source.change
On Sun, 2017-01-29 at 17:54 +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
>
> > reassign 853084 xfce4-pulseaudio-plugin
>
> Bug #853084 [general] general: Not connected to PulseAudio server
> Bug reassigned from package 'general' to 'xfce4-pulseaudio-
On Sun, 2016-07-10 at 08:39 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> Maybe the XFCE / Cinnamon / Mate maintainers can confirm if that is indeed
> the plan.
Talking for pkg-xfce: I have no idea what this is about.
Regards,
--
Yves-Alexis
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed messa
On ven., 2015-08-14 at 02:39 -0400, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote:
> Did you guys have time to look at my repository?
I'm not right sure who you're asking exactly, but just to re-state this
again: I don't want to be involved with Midori packaging anymore *at
all*. You can safely drop me from those m
On ven., 2014-08-08 at 18:38 -0700, Paul C. Bryan wrote:
> With all due respect to XFCE, I'd hate the interpretation to be along
> the lines of, "Oh, Debian state of the art desktop environment feels
> something like Windows, circa 2000." But, XFCE's lightweight. It's
> meant
> to lack such fancy f
On jeu., 2014-08-07 at 23:57 +0200, Jordi Mallach wrote:
> Hi Debian,
About the decision itself, as Debian Xfce main maintainer, I honestly
don't really care. I don't think the default desktop matters that much
on Debian (while I guess it means a lot for Ubuntu, for example). I
actually think havi
On mer., 2014-07-16 at 15:08 +0200, Romain Francoise wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 03:40:13PM +0300, Riku Voipio wrote:
> > Since you seem to know the software well, and it is important for you,
> > perhaps you can take over maintainence of the package? The current
> > maintainer doesn't seem to
udes an upstream source tarball plus a grsec patch?
In my case, it's actually the src:linux orig.tar.xz with the (adapted)
grsec patch added to debian/patches (like other featuresets).
Regards,
--
Yves-Alexis Perez
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 12:45:10PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-04-22 at 22:41 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> [...]
> > NOTE: I don't want to dismiss Mempo attempts, especially the
> > reproducible build part, and I also think it's valuable to provide
wrong or if things have changed since them, and there's
indeed a consensus for the vanilla + grsecurity + make deb-pkg as an
easy way to provide grsec kernels in the Debian archive, then I'm all
for it.
Regards,
--
Yves-Alexis Perez
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
gcc upstream, asking for status and maybe pushing
a little bit forward.
But right now I'm not sure that, in Debian, we have people knowledgeable
enough on the intimate gcc behavior to push that directly. That's a bit
unfortunate.
Regards,
--
Yves-Alexis Perez
Debian security team
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
unsure it's actually related to hidpid=2
and not just to the lack of systemd/logind support in current Xfce
stack.
Regards,
--
Yves-Alexis Perez
Debian security team
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: pkg-xfce-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
* Package name: light-locker
Version : 1.1.0-1
Upstream Author : William Jon McCann, Peter de Ridder, Simon Steinbeiß
* URL : https://github.com/the-cavalry/light-locker/
* License :
On lun., 2012-07-02 at 11:11 +0600, Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
> 3) Then a kexec-based reboot should happen, using the new subvolume as
> the root filesystem.
Note that I just did a quick test with kexec-tools in sid on two boxes,
and kexec failed miserably, so maybe it works perfectly elsewher
On ven., 2012-06-22 at 11:34 +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> #677787 gtk2-engines-xfce: Please add multiarch support
Note that this one (as investigated in the bug report by Goswin and me)
is a bit spurious. For multi-arch Gtk+ apps, a multi-arch engine
matching the theme used by the end user
On mar., 2012-06-12 at 02:23 +0800, Aron Xu wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 2:11 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> > On 06/12/2012 01:52 AM, Aron Xu wrote:
> >> IMHO I suggest to talk with Security Team before disclosing
> >> information that might be sensitive in the mean time on a Debian
> >> develop
On mar., 2012-05-22 at 13:12 +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
> I've just noticed that a bunch of device nodes on my main system running
> Unstable now have the sticky bit set.
>
Google search seems to say that the question has already been asked and
replied on debian-user
http://lists.debian.org/debi
On mar., 2012-05-15 at 14:32 +0900, Norbert Preining wrote:
> Hi dpkg-* maintainers,
I think you missed the correct mailing list to reach the dpkg-*
maintainers.
--
Yves-Alexis
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On mer., 2012-05-16 at 19:45 +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
> I just downloaded the source to Wordpress from Squeeze, it's got a 14M
> .debian.tar.xz which is mostly sources for things that are included in the
> upstream tarball. The build process appears to only use the upstream tarball
> code so
On sam., 2012-05-12 at 23:45 +0200, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
> Being forced to upgrade to a new major version by a stable security support is
> nothing we should force our users to. Debian stable is known for (usually)
> painfree updates and bugfixes only, not for shipping completely new versions
> wit
On ven., 2012-05-11 at 00:16 +0300, Anton Zinoviev wrote:
> On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 09:40:23PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> >
> > Generally the console has to work even before root is mounted, so
> > that the user can enter a decryption password if necessary.
>
> Unfortunately, as far as I know
On mar., 2012-04-10 at 01:03 +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> Or just say in the release notes that it's a good idea to run something
> like this before upgrading:
>
> dpkg -l | awk '/^rc/ {print $2}' | xargs --no-run-if-empty dpkg --purge
>
That's a pretty dangerous line. People (sometimes) don't p
> On do, 2012-02-02 at 12:18 +1100, Russell Coker wrote:
> > On Thu, 2 Feb 2012, dann frazier wrote:
> > > Whilte it may help the kernel team to not have to worry about problems
> > > in the grsec flavor when preparing uploads, preventing delays for the
> > > non-grsec images. But, that just push
On mer., 2012-02-01 at 14:32 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-02-01 at 10:51 +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> > On mer., 2012-02-01 at 10:34 +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > > On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 10:24:40AM +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> > > > On m
On mer., 2012-02-01 at 10:33 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 5:37 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>
> > Just to be clear, 'that work' is not just a matter of forwarding
> > messages back and forward between the Debian BTS and the Linux-VServer
> > developers. Unless the VServer project
On mer., 2012-02-01 at 10:34 +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 10:24:40AM +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> > On mar., 2012-01-31 at 11:01 -0500, micah anderson wrote:
> > > What is stopping you from creating another package, that provides the
> >
On mar., 2012-01-31 at 11:01 -0500, micah anderson wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 22:26:50 +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez
> wrote:
> > So I think it's perfectly clear that nor Debian nor Grsecurity are
> > really interested in Debian shipping a Grsecurity kernel.
>
> Well,
On lun., 2012-01-30 at 14:08 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-01-30 at 11:05 +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> > (adding few CC:s to keep track on the bug)
> >
> > On dim., 2012-01-29 at 21:26 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > On Sun, 2012-01-29 at 20:57
(adding few CC:s to keep track on the bug)
On dim., 2012-01-29 at 21:26 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-01-29 at 20:57 +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> > On dim., 2012-01-29 at 18:22 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > Featuresets
> > > ---
>
On dim., 2012-01-29 at 18:22 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> Featuresets
> ---
>
> The only featureset provided will be 'rt' (realtime), currently built
> for amd64 only. If there is interest in realtime support for other
> architectures, we may be able to add that. However, we do need to
On dim., 2011-11-20 at 20:56 -0500, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> If this thread is specifically related to the broken sandbox in
> chromium right now, then you can use "chromium --no-sandbox" until we
> find an appropriate fix the bug (or help us do that). No need to come
> up with crazy versioning so
On jeu., 2011-10-20 at 18:58 +1100, Russell Coker wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Oct 2011, Timo Jyrinki wrote:
> > Actually, I already know a lot of people whose only desktop machine
> > network connection is a 3G dongle, since unlimited data with it is
> > about half the price of ADSL connection.
>
> My pa
On mar., 2011-10-18 at 15:55 +0200, Didier Raboud wrote:
> Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> > Drop usb-modeswitch completely from the default desktop install?
>
> network-manager recommends modemmanager recommends usb-modeswitch.
>
> network-manager wants modemmanager to handle &
On mar., 2011-10-18 at 13:36 +0200, Didier Raboud wrote:
> What's your opinion ?
Drop usb-modeswitch completely from the default desktop install?
--
Yves-Alexis
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On mer., 2011-08-31 at 11:59 +0100, Wolodja Wentland wrote:
>
> Could you elaborate on your reasons and your intentions for making the
> distinction?
Policy 7.2, mostly, and the fact depends are installed (obviously),
recommends are installed by default (but that can be disabled and one
can remov
On mar., 2011-08-30 at 16:11 +0100, Wolodja Wentland wrote:
>
> I agree that a general change of all metapackages is probably not a good idea,
> but I think that changing the root-nodes of the metapackage tree (i.e.
> metapackages like gnome, xfce4, kde-full, ...) is a sensible change. It is in
>
On jeu., 2011-08-04 at 13:27 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Julian Taylor, le Thu 04 Aug 2011 12:32:27 +0200, a écrit :
> > You might be able to reduce startup time by only linking against the
> > libraries you need or lazyly dynamically loading them.
>
> Or use prelink.
Which as issues especia
On mar., 2011-07-26 at 11:15 +0200, Luca Capello wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Jul 2011 00:46:47 +0200, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 12:27:09AM +0200, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> >> I believe it's high time we start to providing Debian in form of
> official
> >> virtualisation images.
>
On mar., 2011-07-26 at 00:27 +0200, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> I believe it's high time we start to providing Debian in form of official
> virtualisation images. In contrast to the ISOs currently provided it
> allows a quicker evaluation/testing of Debian (and can also be very
> useful for testing
On mer., 2011-06-22 at 14:06 +0800, Aron Xu wrote:
> > What is your use case for the second behaviour?
> >
>
> grub-pc will write MBR every time when triggered, and grub-pc-bin will
> not update grub entry after the kernel is updated. - It is weird when
> you have grub installed to an alternative
On mer., 2011-06-22 at 14:10 +0800, YunQiang Su wrote:
> > What is your use case for the second behaviour?
> >
> The second behavior means that: when update/reinstall grub or
> update/install/reinstall kernel will call update-grub but not call
> grub-install.
Let me rephrase what Ben asked: why
On mar., 2011-05-24 at 09:58 -0300, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> > Say, for the sake of sharing a single .deb offline, what bad thing might
> > happen if I run the -486 kernel on my other machines where I could run
> > the -pae kernel?
>
> Nothing serious, unless they have a lot of RAM (in which case t
On dim., 2011-05-08 at 17:56 +0200, Sven Hoexter wrote:
> Beside that the default timeout setting for the dynamic address is something
> to be discussed, I believe the default is about a week which is rather
> long if you want to have a benefit over static assignment. After all the gain
> of
> ano
On jeu., 2011-03-31 at 14:30 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Xfce 4.8 (for the most part) doesn't rely on hal anymore, at least on Linux.
> Yves-Alexis, what is the fallback on kfreebsd? Does Xfce 4.8 on kfreebsd still
> require hal or will it just have reduced functionality?
>
On BSD it's reduced f
On Mon, 2011-02-14 at 18:17 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> If you develop, maintain or use one of those packages, and you don’t
> want it to disappear, your options are now:
>
> 1. Prepare to disable gnome-panel support (that’s for packages
> which already have other options, such a
On Fri, 2011-03-04 at 23:28 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> Ubuntu actually has better pro-active/defence-in-depth security than
> Debian right now. For example compiler hardening flags, kernel
> hardening (symlink, hardlink, ptrace, nx emulation), MAC (AppArmour).
> Perusing their roadmap pages is quite
On Fri, 2011-03-04 at 12:24 +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> If you're unfamiliar with computers, on the other hand, chances that
> you'll be able to figure out how to enable convenience services are
> slim, at best. Since home users typically use computers in a desktop
> environment, I therefore th
On Thu, 2011-03-03 at 12:45 +0100, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
> main security problem is resolver,
> $host -v www.local
> www.local
> www.local.mydomain.com
>
> see security issue in draft paper also in case
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-cheshire-dnsext-multicastdns-08
resolver is more like th
On Thu, 2011-03-03 at 16:08 +, Philipp Kern wrote:
> We don't like security by obscurity, as you might know.
Not shouting out loud that a service is available doesn't qualify as
“security by obscurity” for me.
Regards,
--
Yves-Alexis
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Debian Xfce Maintainers
* Package name: lightdm
Version : 0.2.3
Upstream Author : Robert Ancell
* URL : https://launchpad.net/lightdm
* License : GPL-3
Programming Lang: C/
Description : simple display manager wi
On Wed, 2011-02-23 at 22:47 -0600, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> As a consequence of these changes, the new Lintian release will cause
> many existing overrides to no longer apply. We recognise that this will
> lead to some noise in the short term but are convinced that the longer
> term advantages ma
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Debian Xfce Maintainers
* Package name: tumbler
Version : 0.1.6
Upstream Author : Jannis Pohlmann
* URL : http://www.xfce.org/
* License : GPL-2+/LGPL-2+
Programming Lang: C
Description : d-bus thumbnailing serv
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Yves-Alexis Perez"
* Package name: garcon
Version : 0.1.5
Upstream Author : Jannis Pohlmann
* URL : http://www.xfce.org
* License : GPL-2+/LGPL-2+
Programming Lang: C
Description : menu library
g
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Debian Xfce Maintainers
* Package name: libxfce4ui
Version : 4.8.1
Upstream Author : the Xfce development team
* URL : http://www.xfce.org/
* License : LGPL-2+
Programming Lang: C
Description : widget library for
On ven., 2011-01-14 at 18:05 -0200, Marco Silva wrote:
> This documentation is generated automatically
> from the source code, using a documentation generator called haddock. Haddock
> is part of the compiler and is also updated when the ghc is. It would be
> good to regenerate the documentation
On mer., 2010-12-08 at 18:00 +0300, Andrey Ponomarenko wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I know that some Debian maintainers use ABI Compliance Checker (ACC)
> tool along with Ustream Tracker at LinuxTesting.org [1] for testing
> backward compatibility of C/C++ libraries. Now I want to inform you
> about opened
On ven., 2010-11-19 at 23:49 +0100, David Kalnischkies wrote:
> And i am usually not offended by someone blaming APT to be too dumb.
> APT is all about dependency resolution, so saying you are not to deep
> into it, but blaming APT to be wrong isn't the best tone either.
> Draw i would say…
Hey,
On ven., 2010-11-19 at 19:23 +0100, David Kalnischkies wrote:
>
> So, go and start reading. Debian has a lot of dependencies and you have a
> lot of possibilities because of that.
> You can't use them if you don't know them.
> And, more important, you can't blame APT for being stupid if you don't
On 19/11/2010 12:29, David Kalnischkies wrote:
> xfce4-mcs-manager recommends it.
> As APT has no indication that this package can go away it does the
> only right thing (TM): Chooses to keep xfce4-mcs-plugins as otherwise
> the user will lose functionality…
> (recommends are defined as installed o
On 19/11/2010 08:52, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> Anyone knows why and how to fix that? Would a “breaks” instead of a
> “conflicts” fix it?
Seems that “Breaks:” doesn't work either:
> Investigating (0) xfce4-settings [ amd64 ] < none -> 4.6.5-3 > ( xfce )
> Broken xfce
On mer., 2010-11-17 at 08:37 -0600, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> I have been working on a piuparts rewrite that makes it easier to find
> install/removal/upgrade bugs. When running it on all packages in
> squeeze, I'm currently getting 682 failures. That doesn't mean 682 RC
> bugs, because some of the f
On ven., 2010-11-12 at 10:37 +, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> Paul Wise wrote:
> >There was the possibility of mentioning the poll in DPN, but it was
> >noted that the deadline already passed. It was suggested that the
> >poll was quite short. It was suggested a more widely advertised and
> >longer r
On 01/09/2010 06:59, Adnan Hodzic wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Adnan Hodzic
>
> * Package name: faenza-icon-theme
> Version : 0.7
> Upstream Author : Matthieu James
> * URL : http://tiheum.deviantart.com/art/Faenza-Icons-173323228
> * License
On 25/08/2010 10:13, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Yves-Alexis Perez writes:
>> Hmhm, out of curiosity, why is t-p-u “way riskier”.
>
> Mostly because there isn't any large pool of systems using t-p-u the way
> there is for unstable,
Yeah, good point.
>
>> Would it be
On 25/08/2010 10:02, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Uploading new versions of leaf software isn't *as* big of a disaster, but
> it does mean that updates to that software that should go into testing
> can't go through the normal testing process and have to go through
> testing-proposed-updates, which is way
On mar., 2010-08-17 at 11:46 -0700, Ryan Niebur wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 08:13:54AM +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> >
> > On a side note, I'd very much like to update midori, but doing a NMU for
> > a new upstream release (he already packaged 0.2.6) is a b
On 17/08/2010 15:51, Xavier Oswald wrote:
> Some times ago I sponsored him uploads of midori. I told him that Im
> interested
> in helping maintaining midori and he said that he is active and will take care
> of it if I well remember. Im sad to hear this.
I asked him multiple time if he needed he
Hey,
did anybody have news from Ryan recently? Some time ago we discussed
midori new upstream release (debian has 0.2.4, 0.2.7 just came out), but
I heard no news since few months. I pinged him on irc, by mail and on
the BTS, but nothing. Seems the last activity was like a month ago, and
I don't k
On 16/08/2010 14:00, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> ]] "Perry E. Metzger"
>
> | In the embedded space, which I know a lot about, it is true that the
> | root FS is on flash or other expensive media -- but it isn't like /usr
> | is on cheaper media in such an environment, it is always part of the
> | ro
I won't comment on the main issue since other people gave you the
solution.
On dim., 2010-08-08 at 16:45 +0300, Zvi Dubitzky wrote:
> I need to generate a Debian package for a library
> As an exercise I tried it with libvirt .
Note that libvirt is already packaged so you can inspire you of th
On lun., 2010-08-09 at 21:13 +0400, Stanislav Maslovski wrote:
> BTW, suboptimal
> subpixel rendering of fonts in Debian is one of the reasons why many
> desktop users switch to other distros.
Is it?
--
Yves-Alexis
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On 04/08/2010 11:54, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
> Unfortunately, a reboot did not help to fix the issue on my system. I am
> running a testing/unstable mixture, by the way.
I think you want reportbug here.
--
Yves-Alexis
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a sub
On 27/07/2010 12:59, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Fernando Lemos writes ("Re: How to make Debian more attractive for users,
> was: Re: The number of popcon.debian.org-submissions is falling"):
>> This is free software. If you want to get your idea implemented,
>> either file a bug report and patiently wa
On 26/07/2010 10:30, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> I could not find that "submenu" while installing 10.04. It's quite
> possibly only in the alternate installer image nowadays (that is used
> for the server edition AFAIK).
So they have such a huge number of people installing the alternate
installer? I
On 21/07/2010 10:25, Paul Wise wrote:
> They also currently have almost 20 times as many popcon submissions as
> Debian and continuing growth:
>
> http://popcon.ubuntu.com/
> http://popcon.ubuntu.com/stat/sub-i386.png
Is it enabled by default without asking the user? (I didn't do an ubuntu
instal
On 20/07/2010 16:56, Giacomo A. Catenazzi wrote:
> I mount filesystem with "noatime" (at home and on my servers),
> and AFAIK popcon don't work with such configuration, so I don't
> install it.
It can at least report the installed packages, I guess?
Cheers,
--
Yves-Alexis
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, e
On 29/06/2010 16:00, Michael Biebl wrote:
> What features does it have over existing packages?
And why not using ondemand? Is AMD support bad?
--
Yves-Alexis
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.deb
On lun., 2010-06-28 at 17:55 +0200, Olivier Bonvalet wrote:
> I agree : on 64bit systems Iceweasel 3.5 is way too slow, and Iceweasel
> 3.6 should be included in Squeeze.
Thank you for volunteering, I'm sure Mike will take all the help you'll
give.
--
Yves-Alexis
signature.asc
Description: Th
On dim., 2010-06-20 at 11:40 +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> You are not even a Debian developer so please refrain from trying to
> re-interpret the DFSG to suite your opinions.
>
Nice, very nice. I'm speechless.
--
Yves-Alexis
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On ven., 2010-06-04 at 02:49 +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
>
> Those wanting another ordering can edit the init.d scripts directly to
> declare some other ordering or provide override headers in
> /etc/inssserv/overrides/ if they want to avoid editing in the
> conffiles included in the package
1 - 100 of 262 matches
Mail list logo
