Re: packages missing from sarge

> > Proposal: allow 1.3.7 into sarge, on the following basis - > > * woody has 1.3.0, ie it's used by current users of stable > > This doesn't deal with questions of possible bit rot (which your tests > address to some extent, but not completely). It also doesn't provide a > smooth upgrade path f

re: packages missing from sarge (apt-proxy)

sorry to followup my own post, but... I did a few apt-proxy-import tests by removing a random set of .debs out of the cache tree and importing again. This worked correctly. Cheers Vince -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTE

re: packages missing from sarge

Hi I'd like to raise the question of apt-proxy. I discussed offlist with JoeyH and he wasn't keen, but now I've done a few tests and have more confidence that this is worth raising. apt-proxy comes in two flavours - the old shell-based one and a new shiny python one. The most recent shell-based