On 24-Mar-2000, Gregor Hoffleit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 24, 2000 at 03:15:02AM -0600, BugScan reporter wrote:
> > Package: gnucash (debian/main)
> > Maintainer: Tyson Dowd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > 60417 docs are split between /usr/doc/g
On 16-Oct-1998, Heiko Schlittermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 16, 1998 at 02:39:38PM +1000, Tyson Dowd wrote:
> :
> : There is no reason why the X-Media field has to be in the Packages
> : files on the CD -- that information could be stored by the multi-cd
> :
give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. - Benjamin Franklin
Tyson Dowd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://tyse.net
On 03-Jun-1998, Joel Klecker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 23:38 -0700 1998-06-02, Tyson Dowd wrote:
> >Manoj addressed most of the big differences in his mail. One that he
> >missed (or glossed over) is the difference in generation of packages.
>
> Another one is
oth functionally
equivalent at this level (so are .tar.gz or a .zip files really).
But when you look at the tools and process used to create a .deb versus
a .rpm, I think RPM needs some work. But chances are there are things
I don't know about RPM -- I looked at it a while ago.
Go
UDING ANY LOST PROFITS OR OTHER INCIDENTAL OR CONSEQUENTIAL
DAMAGES RELATING TO THE INFORMATION.
--
Tyson Dowd # If I'm unusually agressive in this email, it's
# probably because USENET has been down here for
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
r those bug fixes to
be send to where they are useful.
Telling people in the web pages about the problems and recommending one of
[gnus, mutt, other good mailer] *is* a solution. Munging reply-tos is
another solution. Pick one.
--
Tyson Dowd # If I'm unusually agressive in thi
On 16-Dec-1997, Christian Schwarz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Please check out http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html . The page
> contains several arguments against the use of "Reply-To". I fully agree to
> what Ian said.
Please don't quote this URL as if all the issues in this web pa
On 16-Dec-1997, Ian Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tyson Dowd:
> > A couple of us discussed this (and other problems with the mailing
> > list), in the thread "Duplicate messages on this list" in debian-devel
> > about a week ago and eventually came to
is a reply-to, when that takes precedence. If people munge reply-to,
> I'll never knoe, will I?
>
As an aside, when munging reply-tos, if there is an existing reply to,
why not set the From: to that address.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
eference talking about mailing lists (which is where it
says "no CCs") is a possible compromise (along with a quick explanation of
the problems with the common mailers). I'd be happy to write the text
for such a change and get it organized if you think this is a reasonable
comprom
tuation, what are the solutions to the 4 problems I
outlined? -- and what is the likelihood of these solutions actually solving
problems (as opposed to the "spend 30 seconds pruning your headers"
solution, which given the number of CCs on this list, is clearly not
workable).
--
On 05-Dec-1997, Tyson Dowd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'd like it to be fixed, but it seems that there are a few people who
> have strong opinions on the matter, but are not prepared to discuss or
> fix the problems it causes.
Sorry, this came out sounding harsher tha
by that URL,
it will probably just move it to *both* lists).
I'd like it to be fixed, but it seems that there are a few people who
have strong opinions on the matter, but are not prepared to discuss or
fix the problems it causes.
--
Tyson Dowd #
14 matches
Mail list logo
