On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 21:59:37 +0200
Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Stephan Hermann:
>
> >> What's the correct way to get it out of Unbuntu (universe)? I
> >> don't want to relicense it, but if asking politely does not work,
> >> it
Moins,
On Sun, 20 Jul 2008 18:05:47 +0200
Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Osamu Aoki:
>
> > I found some of my packages are offered as a part of Ubuntu archive.
>
> Same here. In my case (debsecan), it's a bit irresponsible because
> the package doesn't really work on Ubuntu--bu
On Sunday 08 January 2006 14:32, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 11:25:28AM +0100, Stephan Hermann wrote:
> >
> > Everything what is on https://wiki.launchpad.canonical.com/ is free to
> > use. Read and think again. Or use another example: Amazons code is not
Hi Torsten,
On Sunday 08 January 2006 12:20, Torsten Landschoff wrote:
> Hi Stephan,
>
> On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 11:25:28AM +0100, Stephan Hermann wrote:
> > Hehe...well, it's a matter of working behaviour. I never said, that
> > working from the CLI is not faster or
On Sunday 08 January 2006 10:39, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 07:49:33PM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 09:02:09AM +0100, Stephan Hermann wrote:
> > > On Sunday 08 January 2006 07:27, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> > > > On F
Hi,
On Sunday 08 January 2006 09:49, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 09:02:09AM +0100, Stephan Hermann wrote:
> > On Sunday 08 January 2006 07:27, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 03:19:42PM -0500, Frans Jessop wrote:
> > > > Ubun
On Sunday 08 January 2006 07:27, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 03:19:42PM -0500, Frans Jessop wrote:
> > Ubuntu's launchpad is amazing. Do you think it would be helpful if all
> > DD's worked through it on their projects? Wouldn't that keep things more
> > organized and efficie
Hi Michael,
On Wednesday 30 November 2005 22:00, Michael Koch wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 08:08:15PM +0100, Stephan Hermann wrote:
> > Well, I will try to revert the change, no problem. But even for
> > libatlas-cpp-0.6 there was a soname change (if you see this bugrepor
Hi Steve,
On Tuesday 29 November 2005 12:15, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 11:38:32AM +0100, Stephan Hermann wrote:
> > > I don't see any reason to rename the -dbg packages, generally.
> >
> > For the first cxx transition during Breezy developmen
Hi Ming, Steve, others,
I did the merge and rename of this library package, so I think I should answer
as well:
On Tuesday 29 November 2005 11:03, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 10:09:00AM -0600, Ming Hua wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 15, 2005 at 06:28:05AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote
Hi,
On Mon, 2005-11-21 at 12:51 +0100, Fathi Boudra wrote:
> > Those packages (pykdeextensions, libpythonize and kde-guidance) are
> > already in Ubuntu Breezy (Ubuntu and Kubuntu Flavour).
> > If you're interested, you can have a look into those package and push
> > them into Debian.
>
> thanks
On Mo, 2005-11-21 at 10:17 +0100, Fathi Boudra wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Fathi Boudra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> * Package name: pykdeextensions
> Version : 0.3.0
> Upstream Author : Simon Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL : http://www.simonzon
.m4/acinclude.m4, but that should
> probably take care of the bug, since Debian never use /usr/lib64.
What about replacing the admin/ dir from the upstream package with
actual one from kde 3.X? (3.4 i think?)
or set KDEDIR/KDEDIRS to the right location of your kdelibs{4}-dev
install in debian/rules f
13 matches
Mail list logo
