Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Stanislav Maslovski
* Package name: tarix
Version : 1.0.7
Upstream Author : Matthew "Cheetah" Gabeler-Lee
* URL : https://github.com/fastcat/tarix;
http://sourceforge.net/projects/xtar/
* License : GPL
P
On Mon, Aug 01, 2011 at 11:16:22PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Stanislav Maslovski, le Tue 02 Aug 2011 00:32:29 +0400, a écrit :
> > KBDD stands for keyboard daemon. It is a simple keyboard layout
> > switching program, which is designed to run in an X11 session and
> &
On Mon, Aug 01, 2011 at 11:48:29PM +0300, Timo Juhani Lindfors wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Stanislav Maslovski writes:
> > Description : Per-window keyboard layout switching daemon for X
>
> How does this relate to the Gnome System->Keyboard->Layouts dialog that
> alr
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Stanislav Maslovski
* Package name: kbdd
Version : 0.6
Upstream Author : Alexander V. Vershilov
* URL : https://github.com/qnikst/kbdd
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C
Description : Per-window keyboard layout
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 11:26:23AM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
> Do we actually have a standardised interface that can disable a service
> and then reenable it so that it is in exactly the same state as before
> it was disabled, without requiring black magic and/or prior knowledge
> of the correct ru
On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 10:51:08PM +0200, Hendrik Sattler wrote:
> Am Mittwoch 06 April 2011, 19:05:11 schrieb Stanislav Maslovski:
> > > On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 07:29:05AM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > > > Then you can stack all soft of stuff on top of it, and
> On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 07:29:05AM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > Then you can stack all soft of stuff on top of it, and get them to
> > work manually for your specific setup, and since it’s not event-based
> > you have
On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 07:29:05AM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le mardi 05 avril 2011 à 02:08 +0400, Stanislav Maslovski a écrit :
> > Well, that is not the question of how many, that is the question of
> > can you do a given task or not with a given tool. NM is limited in a
On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 12:09:42PM +0400, Stanislav Maslovski wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 09:10:47AM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> > ]] Stanislav Maslovski
> >
> > | AFAICT, the main concerns with the current ifupdown-based installation
> > | process is
On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 09:10:47AM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> ]] Stanislav Maslovski
>
> | AFAICT, the main concerns with the current ifupdown-based installation
> | process is that its suport of wireless networks is very limited: only
> | WEP is supported, and there are pro
On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 07:08:19AM +0100, Brett Parker wrote:
> On 05 Apr 00:55, Stanislav Maslovski wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 10:03:12PM +0200, Michelle Konzack wrote:
> > > What I do not understand is WHY the Debian Project can not do an install
> > > in tw
On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 07:39:23PM -0300, Fernando Lemos wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 6:23 PM, Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre
> wrote:
> [...]
> > This said, I don't think NM can be the magic bullet to fix everything.
> > Even RedHat while shipping NetworkManager on servers last I checked,
> > still r
On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 11:17:59PM +0200, Michelle Konzack wrote:
> Hello Stanislav Maslovski,
>
> Am 2011-04-04 01:11:15, hacktest Du folgendes herunter:
> > On Sun, Apr 03, 2011 at 11:26:20PM +0530, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > > May I suggest that you install a squeeze
On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 10:03:12PM +0200, Michelle Konzack wrote:
> What I do not understand is WHY the Debian Project can not do an install
> in two steps. I mean installing the bare base using "ifupdown" and if
> the user choose the Desktop-Task replace it with NM.
AFAICT, the main concerns w
On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 12:30:24PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
[skipped]
> "It is a profoundly erroneous truism, repeated by all copy-books and by
> eminent people when they are making speeches, that we should cultivate the
> habit of thinking of what we are doing. The precise opposite is the case.
On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 01:57:10PM -0500, Romain Beauxis wrote:
> 2011/4/4 Stanislav Maslovski :
> >> I am not happy that network manager bypasses ifconfig to do this; I
> >> would have much preferred a daemon that could properly integrate with
> >> the
On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 06:35:19PM +0100, Jon Dowland wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 06:52:05PM +0400, Stanislav Maslovski wrote:
> > Sould not there be an option to select between the old network configuration
> > and NM?
>
> Nowhere have I seen it argued that NM will be
On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 06:06:28PM +0530, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le lundi 04 avril 2011 à 16:19 +0400, Dmitry E. Oboukhov a écrit :
> > User MUST study each OS he uses.
>
> No, he must not. The OS must adapt to the user’s needs, not the
> opposite.
>
> > If he doesn't want he will be
> > for
On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 07:33:31PM +0530, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le lundi 04 avril 2011 à 10:39 -0300, Ben Armstrong a écrit :
> > But the average laptop user really does have a hard time with the
> > status quo. Something needs to change in the next release.
>
> I think squeeze already does a
On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 05:35:10PM +0530, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le lundi 04 avril 2011 à 11:55 +0400, Stanislav Maslovski a écrit :
> > Well, actually configuring a wireless network with wpa_supplicant and
> > ifupdown is not hard at all and does not require too much time, _if_
On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 12:00:01AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 10:52:33AM +0400, Dmitry E. Oboukhov wrote:
> Yes, a user can do anything with ifconfig if his time has no value. I am
> happily using network manager on my laptop, because unlike ifconfig it's
> easy to conf
On Sun, Apr 03, 2011 at 10:28:42PM +0100, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> I have read all e-mails in this thread, and what constructive criticism
> you may have given is buried under uncompromising prejudice. For
> example:
>
> > If you mean the ifupdown-based configuration, then I cannot agree that
> > i
wrote:
> Le dimanche 03 avril 2011 à 21:32 +0400, Stanislav Maslovski a écrit :
> > Analogously, when I see such "great" technical suggestions as
> > replacing ifupdown on default installs with network-manager, I can't
> > help thinking (and sometimes commenting) th
On Sun, Apr 03, 2011 at 11:26:20PM +0530, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le dimanche 03 avril 2011 à 21:32 +0400, Stanislav Maslovski a écrit :
> > Analogously, when I see such "great" technical suggestions as
> > replacing ifupdown on default installs with network-manager,
On Sun, Apr 03, 2011 at 03:50:36PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 03, 2011 at 04:42:11PM +0400, Stanislav Maslovski wrote:
> > I understand that you are in a position that forces you to think about
> > public relations and such, but if I were a DD I would be more h
On Sun, Apr 03, 2011 at 02:09:09PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 03, 2011 at 01:07:12PM +0200, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
> > Debian is not about market-share, so losing users is no thread. It is
> > only an information for us that we no longer helpful to some of our
> > users.
>
> T
On Sun, Apr 03, 2011 at 12:56:40PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 03, 2011 at 02:37:26PM +0400, Stanislav Maslovski wrote:
> > If that happens I will seriously think about moving to another distro
> > (I have been using Debian since around 1999). Or maybe to a *B
On Sun, Apr 03, 2011 at 10:11:03AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> But if network-manager would become default and ifupdown an optional
> replacement, I would question Debian's capacity to make technically
> excellent decisions and wonder, how much we have been dragged along
> by "user-friendly dis
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 05:29:55PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 16:20:10 +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
>
> > Given that Fedora are adopting /run, and it has been something
> > we have wanted in the past, is anyone working on implementing
> > /run in Debian?
> >
> > http://th
Hello,
On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 10:44:07AM +0200, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
> On 13/03/11 08:19, Ben Finney wrote:
> >Shachar Shemesh writes:
> >>I am subscribed to lots and lots of mailing lists. All mail from those
> >>lists gets automatically delivered to dedicated folders automatically.
> >>This
On Fri, Feb 04, 2011 at 09:47:21AM -0200, Fernando Lemos wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 6:57 AM, Stanislav Maslovski
> wrote:
> [...]
> >> If you want to have that level of control, why don't you just check it
> >> manually? Use --download-only with apt-get (no
On Fri, Feb 04, 2011 at 10:00:40AM +0100, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 9:57 AM, Stanislav Maslovski
> wrote:
> > This is possible, however, it is an extra busy work for a user. In any
> > case, I think that holding a lock only for downloading is an overkil
On Fri, Feb 04, 2011 at 01:21:07AM +0100, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> #include
> * Stanislav Maslovski [Fri, Feb 04 2011, 03:10:54AM]:
> > Hi debian-devel,
> >
> > I wanted to ask this for quite a long time: Does aptitude (I think
> > apt-get does the same) really hav
Hi debian-devel,
I wanted to ask this for quite a long time: Does aptitude (I think
apt-get does the same) really have to lock "the status database area"
when _downloading_ packages?
For example, I am running an update on a slow connection and want to
uninstall or install with dpkg a few packages
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 09:58:22AM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 10:30:07AM +0400, Stanislav Maslovski wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 12:22:08AM +0200, posion bit wrote:
> > > There are 38 unquoted $i in /etc in i386 installing base+laptop+standar
>
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 12:22:08AM +0200, posion bit wrote:
> I've just started my love history again with squeeze.
>
> There are 38 unquoted $i in /etc in i386 installing base+laptop+standar
>
> There are 172 "$i" (maching without spaces around) 38 of them matches
> whit spaces around (unquoted)
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 12:06:48PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le lundi 09 août 2010 à 23:40 +0400, Stanislav Maslovski a écrit :
> > Thus I repeat: the subpixel rendering of fonts in current squeeze is
> > suboptimal, because instead of providing flexibility and full control
&
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 03:15:35AM -0600, Bruce Sass wrote:
> /sbin and /usr/sbin, /lib and /usr/lib directories?
>
> AFAICT, the reason is so that a minimal but functional system is
> guaranteed to exist so long as a local HDD with a root filesystem is
> available (which doesn't necessarily inc
On Mon, Aug 09, 2010 at 08:54:16PM +0200, Sebastian Krause wrote:
> Stanislav Maslovski wrote:
> > I am pretty sure porting is doable and I think I can volunteer to do
> > this. But before it, let us collect more opinions. It would be nice to
> > know what does the releas
On Mon, Aug 09, 2010 at 08:31:53PM +0200, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
> On 08/09/2010 07:13 PM, Stanislav Maslovski wrote:
> > I am pretty sure porting is doable and I think I can volunteer to do
> > this. But before it, let us collect more opinions. It would be nice to
> > know
On Mon, Aug 09, 2010 at 05:22:27PM +0200, Sebastian Dröge wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-08-09 at 18:27 +0400, Stanislav Maslovski wrote:
> > Thus, getting to the main point of this long e-mail: what are we going
> > to do with libcairo2 in squeeze? If we keep it at 1.8.10, I think it
>
Hi debian-devel,
As we all know, squeeze is frozen now. This was a long awaited event,
although for some importans software that we have in the distro it
would be beneficial if this moment could happen later. One of such
examples is libcairo2.
The last release by ustream [1] is 1.8.10. At the mom
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 05:39:19PM +0200, Benjamin Drung wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, den 22.07.2010, 23:14 +0800 schrieb Paul Wise:
> > On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 4:28 PM, Giacomo A. Catenazzi
> > wrote:
> Debian contributors don't have to be Debian users at the beginning. They
> can come from Debian-de
On Thu, Jun 03, 2010 at 10:36:09AM +0200, C. Gatzemeier wrote:
> Am Thu, 3 Jun 2010 00:43:20 +0400
> schrieb Stanislav Maslovski :
>
> > > The great thing about Debian is that it can mean and handle so many
> > > different things for so many people.
> >
> &g
On Wed, Jun 02, 2010 at 11:59:18AM +0200, C. Gatzemeier wrote:
> Am Wed, 2 Jun 2010 12:53:03 +0400
> schrieb Stanislav Maslovski:
>
> > But why Debian should care about the precise details of local
> > admistration policies?
>
> If you have read #248130
Yes, I have
On Wed, Jun 02, 2010 at 10:27:35AM +0200, C. Gatzemeier wrote:
[skipped]
BTW, mutt seems to incorrectly fill the References: header when I
reply to your mail.
Just a second test. Please ignore...
--
Stanislav
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
On Wed, Jun 02, 2010 at 10:27:35AM +0200, C. Gatzemeier wrote:
> Am Wed, 2 Jun 2010 01:20:00 +0400 schrieb Stanislav Maslovski
> :
>
> Do not worry. They are not to be created by default.
> If you read the subject it even explicitly reads "optionally
> create".
&
On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 08:23:00PM +0200, C. Gatzemeier wrote:
>
> If collaboration among users should work nicely out of the box, we will
> finally need three small things. I am not sure in which package some of
> them should go, though.
>
> 1) An install? option to populate /etc/skel/ with the
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Stanislav Maslovski
* Package name: xkbind
Version : 2010.05.20
Upstream Author : CHG
* URL : http://xkbind.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPL2
Programming Lang: C
Description : X Keyboard Extension Indicator
The
On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 04:43:32PM -0400, Stephen Powell wrote:
> On Sat, 29 May 2010 14:40:41 -0400 (EDT), Andreas Barth wrote:
> > Stephen Powell wrote:
> >> On Sat, 22 May 2010 23:39:52 -0400 (EDT), William Pitcock wrote:
> >>> After some discussion about lilo on #debian-devel in IRC, it has pre
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 12:11:30AM +0400, William Pitcock wrote:
> Hi,
>
> - "Stephen Powell" wrote:
>
> > (blah blah blah blah)
>
> Nobody cares if you are opposed to it. Unless you are offering to become
> lilo upstream, it's going away.
That is why I love reading d-dev. Some debian dev
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 04:00:57AM +0200, Thomas Hochstein wrote:
> Felipe Sateler schrieb:
>
> > I mean, is there a reason for why I would want a non-UPG system?
>
> What about a hosting environment where you need to have user files
> world-readable (HTML documents or (PHP) scripts readable by w
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 01:40:53PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Apr 27, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:
>
> > reasonable commenter), and now you're saying that Julien Cristau is "the
> > peanut gallery".
> No, I am not.
>
> > But you're breaking peoples' systems *now*. And breaking systems
> Which
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 10:11:01AM +0200, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 10:09, Stanislav Maslovski
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Debian BTS seems to be on vacation. For how long?
>
> http://downforeveryoneorjustme.com/bugs.debian.org
I can ping it:
PING
Hi,
Debian BTS seems to be on vacation. For how long?
--
Stanislav
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100429080919.ga17...@kaiba.homelan
On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 05:04:58PM +0900, Kazuo Oishi wrote:
> Vincent Danjean writes:
> >>> Anyone, could you teach me why net.ipv6.bindv6only need to be set
> >>> to 1 globally, and why other good programs need to be changed?
> >>> I think it should revert.
> >
> > I've no strong opinion about t
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 01:38:56PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 01:05:37PM +0100, Simon Paillard wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 02:16:58PM +0300, Stanislav Maslovski wrote:
> > > One of my packages, fuse-convmvfs (uploaded by a sponsor), cannot
> &
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 07:31:42PM +0100, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
> > We would like to know what needs attention, what bugs still need to be
> > fixed in your package before squeeze is released, which features or new
> > upstream versions you want to see in squeeze which are not ready yet.
> > Furth
On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 10:45:26PM +1030, Karl Goetz wrote:
> On Sun, 14 Mar 2010 12:58:48 +0100
> Frank Lin PIAT wrote:
>
> > Hi dear Teams,
>
> At the risk of getting involved...
> Where was the criticism that started this thread posted to? I didn't
> notice it pass on -devel.
I think it was
On Thu, Mar 04, 2010 at 04:32:45PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le jeudi 04 mars 2010 à 15:20 +0100, Bill Allombert a écrit :
> > On Thu, Mar 04, 2010 at 10:26:06AM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > > No. It’s just that they ship with HTML documentation, which is much more
> > > suitable for d
On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 07:17:14PM +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> On 28/02/2010 01:32, Ben Finney wrote:
> > Josselin Mouette writes:
> >
> >> > Yes, I overall agree with your arguments. However having it in the
> >> > policy means we get bug reports about manual pages and have to deal
> >> >
On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 10:57:48AM +0100, Michael Welle wrote:
> Hello,
>
> several init scripts use such a fragment for sourcing init-functions:
>
> if ! [ -x "/lib/lsb/init-functions" ]; then
> . /lib/lsb/init-functions
> else
> echo "E: /lib/lsb/init-functions not found, lsb-base (>= 3.0-6
package powersaved
reopen 503991
thanks
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 10:28:36AM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> Stanislav Maslovski wrote:
> > Package: powersaved
> > Version: 0.15.20-3
> > Severity: serious
> >
>
> This severity is totally exagerrated. w
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Stanislav Maslovski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: cdde
Version : 0.2.0
Upstream Author : Eric Lathrop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://ericlathrop.com/cdde/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Stanislav Maslovski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: avinfo
Version : 1.0.a16
Upstream Author : George Shuklin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://shounen.ru/soft/avinfo/
* License : GPL
Program
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Stanislav Maslovski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: awesome
Version : 1.2
Upstream Author : Julien Danjou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://awesome.naquadah.org/
* License : GPL (original dwm code is
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Stanislav Maslovski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: fuse-convmvfs
Version : 0.2.4
Upstream Author : Z.C. Miao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://fuse-convmvfs.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPL
Program
On Tue, Aug 28, 2007 at 10:49:21AM +0200, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
> Michael Banck wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 28, 2007 at 02:57:07AM +0300, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> >> It is not free software. I had a quick peek at the license in the .deb
> >> available from Opera's website, and it would not seem that they
On Wed, Aug 08, 2007 at 01:38:18PM -0400, Tim Hull wrote:
>
> I just reported an ITP Bug for restricted-manager [1]
>
> [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=436722
>
> Just making sure you know this...
You do not have to do this, and I think you have already realized why.
On Tue, Aug 07, 2007 at 09:28:05PM +0200, Julien BLACHE wrote:
> Stanislav Maslovski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >> Random segfaults during playback, random segfaults while scrolling the
> >> playlist; can't have it running for more than 2 minutes.
> &
On Tue, Aug 07, 2007 at 11:38:33AM +0200, Julien BLACHE wrote:
> "David Lopez Zajara (Er_Maqui)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > Personally i'm an xmms user, and now, with this, i have tested other
> > options. Audacious isn't an option at all. Yes, we have the same
>
> I've recently tr
On Thu, May 17, 2007 at 09:20:48AM +0200, Mgr. Peter Tuharsky wrote:
> Stanislav,
>
>
> I see Your point, however this is far from "user-friendliness".
>
> First solution -use other distro. Wow, what a great idea. Looking at
> statistics and Linux users in neighborhood, You can be _sure_ they
On Thu, May 17, 2007 at 09:12:18AM +0200, Mgr. Peter Tuharsky wrote:
> Steve,
>
>
> I see main problem with testing that broad platform changes are going
> there. That's why things break sometimes there.
>
> That's why I think, that the Stable platform with new desktop software
> might be the
On Thu, May 17, 2007 at 08:20:50AM +0200, Mgr. Peter Tuharsky wrote:
> Steve,
>
> >And as others have pointed out, the purpose of stable is to minimize
> >disruptions. For many users, living with known bugs with known workarounds
> >is a *lot* better than identifying new bugs.
>
> Yeas. Let the c
On Sat, Oct 21, 2006 at 03:18:45PM -0600, Bruce Sass wrote:
> On Sat October 21 2006 13:35, Darren Salt wrote:
> > I demand that Hendrik Sattler may or may not have written...
> > > 64bit kernels are not available in the i386 archive. That makes the
> > > 64bit libs rather useless, doesn't it?
> >
Hello d-dev,
I noticed yesterday that after an upgrade I got a /usr/lib64 dir
with some (not neded) stuff in it. I am not running any 64 bit arch.
$ dpkg -S /usr/lib64 # says:
libg2c0-dev, fakeroot, libgfortran1-dev: /usr/lib64
I have found that there is a bug [1] on fakeroot reporting the same.
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Stanislav Maslovski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: avinfo
Version : 1.0.a15
Upstream Author : George Shuklin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://shounen.ru/soft/avinfo/
* License : GPL
Description :
77 matches
Mail list logo
