On 2011-06-27 18:42, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 05:49:34PM +0200, Stanisław Findeisen wrote:
>> This specifies that users sf, u2 and u3 can each do passwordless su to
>> users root and sf2. User sf2 can do passwordless su to user u2. You can
>> also use &qu
On 2011-06-01 20:24, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 12:43:46PM +0200, Stanisław Findeisen wrote:
>
>> It looks that pam_listfile only allows to restrict *source* user set and
>> *not* *target* user set.
>
> That's not true at all. item=user *is*
Hi
It looks that pam_listfile only allows to restrict *source* user set and
*not* *target* user set.
Here's the debian-user discussion:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2011/05/msg02054.html
Is there any way to do what I want?
If I write a patch for pam_listfile, will you accept it to Debian
On 2011-05-06 19:04, Niels Thykier wrote:
> On 2011-05-06 18:52, StanisBaw Findeisen wrote:
>> On 2011-05-06 12:18, StanisBaw Findeisen wrote:
>>> Heh, that's what this question is about. :-)
>>>
>>> Restricting certain privileges (like su root) to certain users only
>>> looks more secure than lett
On 2011-05-06 12:18, Stanisław Findeisen wrote:
> Heh, that's what this question is about. :-)
>
> Restricting certain privileges (like su root) to certain users only
> looks more secure than letting everyone do it... Is there any particular
> reason Debian GNU/Linux is so p
Heh, that's what this question is about. :-)
Restricting certain privileges (like su root) to certain users only
looks more secure than letting everyone do it... Is there any particular
reason Debian GNU/Linux is so permissive by default?
--=20
Eisenbits - proven software solutions: http://www.ei
Why is there no wheel group by default in Debian GNU/Linux?
--
Eisenbits - proven software solutions: http://www.eisenbits.com/
OpenPGP: E3D9 C030 88F5 D254 434C 6683 17DD 22A0 8A3B 5CC0
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble
7 matches
Mail list logo
