On mån, 2024/09/23 at 10:57:22 +0200, Daniel Gröber wrote:
> Hi Sirius,
>
> Thanks for taking ifupdown-ng for a spin.
No problem at all. Thank you for being patient for my response, I have
been working out some kinks around finit to get the system spitting out a
graphical session. :-D
On sön, 2024/09/22 at 23:41:56 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Netplan seems like *different* bells and whistles, rather than none.
True.
> If you want no belss or whistles, then install neither of ifupdown,
> network-manager nor systemd-networkd, and operate your network using ip
> and (unless
On fre, 2024/09/20 at 13:12:36 +0200, Lukas Märdian wrote:
[snip]
> # Proposal
> My proposal is to enable a hybrid network stack, using systemd-networkd (on
> server/cloud/container/embedded systems) and NetworkManager (on desktop/laptop
> systems) unified through a common layer of Netplan configur
In days of yore (Wed, 15 May 2024), Sirius thus quoth:
> Thank you. I will update later with results for kernel 6.9.0 and Xen
> 4.18.2, how they work together.
Quick feedback: it works, although I am seeing some weird log-spewing when
I run things like aptitude and apt-get search. I will p
In days of yore (Wed, 15 May 2024), Simon Richter thus quoth:
> Hi,
Hello Simon,
> On 5/15/24 10:31, Sirius wrote:
>
> >Where is the systemd-dev package for regular Bookworm? The only package
> >that show up is systemd-dev/stable-backports 254.5-1~bpo12+3 all an
Good morning/day/evening,
TL;DR version
Where is the systemd-dev package for regular Bookworm? The only package
that show up is systemd-dev/stable-backports 254.5-1~bpo12+3 all and if
I try and install that, it seems like it wants to uninstall most of my
system in the process.
Roundabout
In days of yore (Sun, 07 Apr 2024), José Luis González thus quoth:
> Hi,
>
> Debian 12 was released with two Release Critical bugs I filed on May
> 20th 2023 (#1036424 and #1036388) on Sylpheed about issues that I
> found on stable, and remain, with Debian 12 released later on June 10th
> 2023.
In days of yore (Fri, 05 Apr 2024), Daniel Leidert thus quoth:
> Am Freitag, dem 29.03.2024 um 23:20 +0100 schrieb Moritz Mühlenhoff:
> > Russ Allbery wrote:
> > > I think this question can only be answered with reverse-engineering of the
> > > backdoors, and I personally don't have the skills to
In days of yore (Tue, 02 Apr 2024), Colin Watson thus quoth:
> TCP wrappers
>
Not used hosts.{allow,deny} for the last 17 years (since I started my
current employment) so I am biased. Honest opinion is that firewall and
fail2ban have pretty much obsoleted TCP wrappers.
> SELinux
> =
In days of yore (Sun, 31 Mar 2024), Colin Watson thus quoth:
> On Sun, Mar 31, 2024 at 10:10:42AM +0200, Sirius wrote:
> > Not worth boiling the ocean over, but is there an estimate of how many
> > packaged projects have customisations to their autoconf that is not found
>
In days of yore (Sun, 31 Mar 2024), Bastian Blank thus quoth:
> On Sat, Mar 30, 2024 at 08:15:10PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 30, 2024 at 05:12:17PM +0100, Sirius wrote:
> > > I have seen discussion about shifting away from the whole auto(re)conf
> > >
In days of yore (Fri, 29 Mar 2024), Russ Allbery thus quoth:
> Russ Allbery writes:
> > Sirius writes:
>
> >> This is quite actively discussed on Fedora lists.
> >> https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/
> >> https://www.openwall.com/lists/
Hi there,
This is quite actively discussed on Fedora lists.
https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/
https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/03/29/4
Worth taking a look if action need to be taken on Debian.
--
Kind regards,
/S
13 matches
Mail list logo
