For the love of god: put ncurses 3.4 back!

1997-06-29 Thread SirDibos
Lets take a little look at this copyright issue. Why dont we just rename ncurses3.4 to something else? dcurses perhaps? If an old author of software gives it up, he should *give it up*. Ncurses works fine, tons of us use and like it... Can slang do everything ncurses can, and is it as widely

Re: debmake

1997-06-28 Thread SirDibos
I couldnt help but notice that there are no Canadian or even American (South or Central) mirrors of debian with the non-us category. I have been offered a T1 connect, but dont have any hardware. If someone has a spare machine capable of running linux, I can provide a Canadian mirror. We dont ha

Re: "Amulet" GUI toolkit

1997-06-28 Thread SirDibos
On Fri, 27 Jun 1997, Graham C. Hughes wrote: > trying to package scsh. If a walkthrough was available, I'd certainly > appreciate it, and it would allow me to package the thing in a reasonable > amount of time. Yeah, and if you give him a walk through, please forward it to me too, because Ive

Re: "Amulet" GUI toolkit

1997-06-27 Thread SirDibos
> > Amulet is available for free by anonymous FTP or WWW. ... The only > > restriction is that the documentation for Amulet is copyrighted, so > > you cannot distribute the Amulet manual or papers without permission > > from CMU. Um, geez. Did anyone think to actually ask them? There is every p

Re: Editor wars considered harmful

1997-06-24 Thread SirDibos
On Tue, 24 Jun 1997, Jon Rabone wrote: > >Or if anyone interested, make up a special ROM with kernel etc in it, so > >the machine will boot from ROM... Has anyone done this? > You'd need about 512 kB of ROM. Where are you going to put it? Ethercard > boot ROMS are more like 16 kB. Bugger that.

Re: Editor wars considered harmful

1997-06-23 Thread SirDibos
On 23 Jun 1997, Sven Rudolph wrote: > (Nowadays many people won't install base from floppy, so I'd even risk > more base floppies, but currently this is plain speculation, because > there is enough free space (more than 800kBK for 1.44MB floppies).) Ehhh! Ix nay! Hold on! No way man. I dont

Koules now only for X?????

1997-06-14 Thread SirDibos
How and why when and Where? Why is Koules only available for X??? I *loved* the variety of console games that came with Debian. Now one by one they are being X'ised from the distribution =( Koules, Maelstrom, Abuse I can understand Abuse (altho that should be available for the console again

Re: Hamm: Exim + Chos standard?

1997-06-14 Thread SirDibos
On Thu, 12 Jun 1997, SirDibos wrote: > > Also we might think about replacing lilo with chos as the standard boot > > loader from harddisk. lilo always is a difficulty for newbies, chos > > offers: > > Sounds good to me. I am an advocate of many solutions I hate t

Re: Hamm: Exim + Chos standard?

1997-06-14 Thread SirDibos
I second the motion. Smail has been nothing but a headache for me. I was *so* releived to get fetchpop working, so that I could bypass the need to pass my mail thru port 25 on my own machine for delivery. pine + fetchpop + procmail serves all my email needs. (Im not up 24/7, so its ok ;)) spe

Re: Koules now only for X?????

1997-06-14 Thread SirDibos
On Fri, 13 Jun 1997, Mark Baker wrote: > We need X versions too (I'm not going anywhere near svgalib or other console > stuff, I've been forced to reboot too many times, which isn't very funny > when I've also got other users logged in). Umm. My system is a home system. Why were you runnin