Re: [Election Results] Official and Final

2000-03-31 Thread Seth R Arnold
* Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000331 12:23]: > On Fri, Mar 31, 2000 at 07:08:07PM -, Darren Benham wrote: > > The ballots came from: > > 216 people, if I counted right (wc(1) :). So much for the `300 active > developers' vaporware, even if you include dissidents et al... Wouldn't this be

Re: Packages should not Conflict on the basis of duplicate funct

1999-09-28 Thread Seth R Arnold
On Tue, Sep 28, 1999 at 11:13:53AM -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote: > Ok, let's bring this back to implementation. How would you propose we handle > this? Currently daemons install, set themselves up, and begin running. > > a) we can prompt. > b) we leave everything off and let the admin turn i

Re: Packages should not Conflict on the basis of duplicate functionality

1999-09-25 Thread Seth R Arnold
On Sat, Sep 25, 1999 at 01:02:44AM -0700, Joey Hess wrote: > The Doctor What wrote: > > Why shouldn't *all* daemon packages ask these questions, and whether to even > > run *upon install*? > > Because we need to decrease the number of questions asked at install time, > not increase it. How about