Re: mplayer, the time has come

2005-02-28 Thread Sebastien NOEL
ot; whow > That said, are the patents supposedly affecting libfaad2 actively > being enforced? Read The Fucking File > I don't know how many times this can be said: non-us is *not a > solution* to patents affecting the US, and never has been. and what now ? ok non-us is not the s

Re: mplayer, the time has come

2005-02-28 Thread Sebastien NOEL
ce of upstream : AFAICR a monolithic 'mplayer' improves performances Paul Hampson was faster than me for this point. (but finally, i don't know if it is a good idea because ffmpeg was configured with '--disable-mmx') > answer of 1 DD: on the other hand, without any kind of mplayer, Debian > is at a loss [agree] Regards, Sebastien NOEL pgpt9Cfm3CvAJ.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: mplayer, the time has come

2005-02-24 Thread Sebastien NOEL
(libavformat-dev) ? Qestion to all DD: Without decss, faad, lame & xvid, mplayer insn't really mplayer. Why debian doesn't have a semi-official structure similar to PLF ? (Maybe it's time to resurrect non-us) Regards, Sebastien NOEL pgpB8vjnVAinb.pgp Description: PGP signature