On Fri, 03 Oct 2003 21:40:06 +0200, MichaÅ Politowski wrote:
[locating broken packages]
> Usually I just press l~b
Cool, thanks. I didn't know that trick. (The German translation of the "l"
feature is misleading, no it's actually totally wrong... It never occurred
to me that this keybinding could
On Fri, 03 Oct 2003 17:20:11 +0200, Steve Greenland wrote:
> On 02-Oct-03, 21:59 (CDT), Daniel Burrows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> It will never be off by default while I am a maintainer of the package,
>> unless someone gets me to change my mind (which I don't think is
>> likely; I already thou
On Fri, 03 Oct 2003 05:20:10 +0200, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> As I indicated in a recent message, I don't currently have time to
> get aptitude working the way I'd like. Please consider this a public
> call for a codeveloper -- you can "interview" by submitting working
> patches for one of the is
On Wed, 27 Aug 2003 10:10:11 +0200, Mark Howard wrote:
> Sorry for cross-posting. There are many interested people who only read
> one of the lists I'm posting to.
>
> Hello again,
> It's great to see so many positive comments about galeon. Hopefully
> 1.3.8 will go into stable.
It would be re
On Sun, 24 Aug 2003 05:50:07 +0200, Colin Watson wrote:
>> /usr/local/lib/texmf/ls-R
>
> Those aren't bugs (well, possibly apart from the TeX one, dunno about
> that).
ls-R is an index generated by texhash, so that Debian's teTeX can use TeX
packages installed under /usr/local.
--
Best Regards
On Sun, 13 Jul 2003 15:00:10 +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> If you installed exim4 and used frontend=noninteractive or just press
> on every debconf-question you should end up exactly with this:
> local delivery only.
In this case, it was the exim3 package, which had a non-debconf
configuration
On Sun, 13 Jul 2003 12:30:08 +0200, ZHAO Wei wrote:
>> So do we want there to be a MTA by default?
>
> I, for one, don't want there be a MTA by default. At least not a running
> daemon there.
What about inetd (which is IMHO the current default)?
--
Best Regards, | Hi! I'm a .signature viru
On Sun, 13 Jul 2003 11:50:07 +0200, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
> Enough of a Linux system assumes that a MTA is present that not
> installing any would be wrong. Asking an user which MTA they want is
> equally wrong because many users have no clue what one is.
I strongly support this. A week or
On Fri, 20 Jun 2003 23:40:13 +0200, Cyrille Chepelov wrote:
>> I'd drop the sub-pentiums (i.e. 386 and 486) entirely. Not that my vote
>> would count...
>
> Hmmm. Until all of glibc, the kernel and gcc deprecate and discard
> support for 386 and 486,
One of them is enough to be a showstopper.
>
On Fri, 20 Jun 2003 17:20:13 +0200, Mathieu Roy wrote:
> If so, are you kidding? The Pentium classic (i586) was still available
> in 1997.
It is still available even today. Not sure where to get a mainboard for
this beast, but just a week ago I saw it on a price list.
> I know a lot of person wh
10 matches
Mail list logo
