Holger Levsen writes:
>> That's where you come into play: it would be nice if you could share
>> what are — according to you — the most important
>> projects/improvements that Debian ought to make. You can share your
>> ideas here by replying to this email, but it would be interesting to
>> file
Hello,
As part of an upcoming survey that we are preparing, we plan to ask
Debian developers to rank, by order of importance, the most popular
ideas of improvements for Debian.
However, there's no easy way to identify what are the most popular ideas
of improvements that Debian ought to make. We
), Moritz Muehlenhoff
(jmm), Salvatore Bonaccorso (carnil), Sébastien Delafond (seb), and
Yves-Alexis Perez (corsac).
We'd like to thank the Mini-DebConf organizers for providing the
facilities for our sprint, as well as all donors to the Debian project
who helped to cover a large part of our exp
On Oct/15, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> Please talk to upstream (or maybe to both upstreams) before renaming
> anything.
> [...]
> Eeek... https://lists.debian.org/20070428095345.ga9...@kunpuu.plessy.org
The package is already in NEW, and contains /usr/bin/yank-cli. I'll add
a note to README.Debian about t
On Oct/15, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> Sounds very cool, but apt-file tells me this name is already taken:
>
> emboss: /usr/bin/yank
I think I'll keep the package name, but I'll install the binary itself
under some other name, maybe something like /usr/bin/yank-cli ?
Cheers,
--Seb
5 matches
Mail list logo