On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 08:30:40AM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 03:43:42AM +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > On Mon, 2009-11-23 at 17:28:39 -0800, Rodrigo Gallardo wrote:
> > > Part of my usual workflow with the 1.0 format is to do an interdiff on
> >
Part of my usual workflow with the 1.0 format is to do an interdiff on
the .diff.gz from the previous version to the one I intend to upload,
to check that the changes correspond to what my vcs says they are. Now
that the changes are in a tarball, are there any recommended tools to
do that compariso
lintian is complaining about a package of mine I just converted to 3.0
(quilt) that:
W: rep-gtk source: patch-system-but-no-source-readme
N:
N:This package build-depends on a patch system such as dpatch or quilt,
N:but there is no debian/README.source file. This file is recommended for
N:
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 09:41:31PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
> >-- The code is modified to interact with the user using a network
> > protocol
> > that does not allow to display a prominent offer.
>
> Any example of this?
One could add an IMAP interface to a blog management system, allow
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 08:30:16PM +0200, Patrick Schoenfeld wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 07:03:07PM +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
> > On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 17:41:14 +
> > Florian Weimer wrote:
> >
> > > * Michal Čihař:
> > >
> > > >> Can gnaughty download anything other than porn?
> > > >
>
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 06:06:17PM +0100, Luca Niccoli wrote:
> 2009/1/30 Rodrigo Gallardo :
>
> > And, in any case, please do put (a summary of) that list in the
> > package's description. Your users will be most pleased.
>
> Does this look better?
>
> Fsw
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 03:47:10PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-01-30 at 15:23 +0100, Luca Niccoli wrote:
> > 2009/1/30 Julien Cristau :
> >
> > > how many of those do we need? why this one in particular?
> >
> > I've been looking in Debian for a command line tool that takes
> > p
Eric Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> When I click on this feed: http://www.borowitzreport.com/, the first
> item is (currently) the following. Liferea pops up a browser window
> for the embedded URL in the whenever I try to display
> headlines -- I'm not even trying to read the body of the item.
>
>
faik they do not get a @debian.org address.
No, they don't.
--
Rodrigo Gallardo
GPG-Fingerprint: 7C81 E60C 442E 8FBC D975 2F49 0199 8318 ADC9 BC28
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 10:31:36AM -0500, Steve Greenland wrote:
> On 30-Mar-08, 15:25 (CDT), Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > dpkg in experimental supports triggers now, and in many cases trigger
> > support can be added to packages without creating a hard dependency on
> > a new version
. checkbashisms is fooled.
Same case for /usr/bin/sawfish-client in sawfish.
Is there some quick way this kind of thing could be detected?
--
Rodrigo Gallardo
GPG-Fingerprint: 7C81 E60C 442E 8FBC D975 2F49 0199 8318 ADC9 BC28
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 05:53:09PM -0600, Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 07:01:11PM +0100, Santiago Ruano Rincón wrote:
> > ...
> > Unpacking replacement bzip2 ...
> > Setting up bzip2 (1.0.3-7) ...
> > install-info(/usr/share/info/bzi
ror exit status 1
>
> The problem is with bzip2.info, produced by makeinfo during the building
> process.
A very similar bug hit librep-doc about a week ago (#451265) and, just
today, sawfish (#456791) It was cloned as #451268 and supposedly solved on
Nov 14, but it seems to have come ba
On Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 09:11:31AM -0600, Steve Greenland wrote:
> On 04-Dec-07, 00:07 (CST), Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > Would it be
> > reasonable for such packages to provide one? What would be the propper
> > name?
>
> M
It's been brought to my attention that liferea, while being able to
use wget, curl, gwget and kget to download feed attachments, does not
Recommend or Suggest any of them, or their alternatives.
Since I'd rather not maintain a long list of possible file
downloaders, I tried but failed to find some
the build will fail.
>
> ...and the resulting error is passed back to the rules file (and the
> rules file doesn't ignore the result of the command itself, for that
> matter). It's not the execution of the binary that's the problem, it's
> depending on it succeedi
"Miriam Ruiz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 2007/10/16, Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> On Mon, 15 Oct 2007, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote:
>> > Is there any reason why the database containing maintainers MIA
>> > (missing
>> > in action)
>>
>> It's unlikely to change. If you need to ma
tting corrupted.
Any help on debugging this or pointers on how to track it would be appreciated.
--
Rodrigo Gallardo
GPG-Fingerprint: 7C81 E60C 442E 8FBC D975 2F49 0199 8318 ADC9 BC28
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Package name: twitux
Version : 0.50
Upstream Author : Daniel Morales
URL : http://live.gnome.org/DanielMorales/Twitux
License : GPL
Programming Lang: C
Descr
most of your downloads are local.
>
> So, in other words, it builds a package cache?
>
> I don't see how your description amounts to a "no".
Because the OP's definition of "package cache", as I glean from the
original mail, is something completely different.
--
Rodrigo Gallardo
GPG-Fingerprint: 7C81 E60C 442E 8FBC D975 2F49 0199 8318 ADC9 BC28
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
k and Directory[1], none of
which seem very well suited for a wm. Moreover, metacity's equivalent
file also lacks the entry.
So, should I add it anyways? As Application? Or should I just override
the lintian error?
[1] http://standards.freedesktop.org/desktop-entry-spec/1.0/ar01s05.html
--
On Sun, May 13, 2007 at 05:40:35PM +0200, Guus Sliepen wrote:
> On Sun, May 13, 2007 at 10:02:24AM -0500, Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote:
>
> > 1. I'll be shipping the compatibility script as /usr/bin/stunnel3 and
> > the main v4 binary as /usr/bin/stunnel4. I
d just live with funnily-named conf files for stunnel?
Thanks,
--
Rodrigo Gallardo
GPG-Fingerprint: 7C81 E60C 442E 8FBC D975 2F49 0199 8318 ADC9 BC28
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Fri, Mar 23, 2007 at 08:31:00AM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 07:23:51AM -0600, Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote:
> > In trying to send mail to an alioth ml I got:
> >
> > The following message to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was undeliverable.
>
On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 04:01:20PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz:
>
> > In trying to send mail to an alioth ml I got:
> >
> > The following message to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was undeliverable.
> > The reason for the problem:
&
In trying to send mail to an alioth ml I got:
The following message to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was undeliverable.
The reason for the problem:
5.1.0 - Unknown address error 550-"Verification failed for <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]>\nCalled: 207.44.202.99\nSent: RCPT TO:<[EMAIL
PROTECTED]>\nResponse: 550
y have quite some testing from himself and
from users. Actually, I'd sponsor him if I were able.
--
Rodrigo Gallardo
GPG-Fingerprint: 7C81 E60C 442E 8FBC D975 2F49 0199 8318 ADC9 BC28
Zenophobia: the irrational fear of convergent sequences.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
not be used' ?
--
Rodrigo Gallardo
GPG-Fingerprint: 7C81 E60C 442E 8FBC D975 2F49 0199 8318 ADC9 BC28
Zenophobia: the irrational fear of convergent sequences.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
ck is one where it's
waiting for input from an external process which might have gotten
stuck or dead.
--
Rodrigo Gallardo
GPG-Fingerprint: 7C81 E60C 442E 8FBC D975 2F49 0199 8318 ADC9 BC28
Billboard billboard burning bright / in my windshield every night.
Lead me to a decent joint / w
d of
questions.
So, before we try it, any ideas how to avoid that and keep us possible
volunteers motivated?
[1] And that points out another posible task: Mediating between
non-english-speaking users and DDs. Many won't do bug reports because
of language barriers.
--
Rodrigo Gallardo
GPG-Fingerpr
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Package name: keytouch-editor
Version : 2.1.0
Upstream Author : Marvin Raaijmakers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
URL : http://keytouch.sourceforge.net/index.html
License
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: keytouch
Version : 2.2.0
Upstream Author : Marvin Raaijmakers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://keytouch.sourceforge.net/index.html
* License
t; > > right of the decimal, making the zero significant.
> >
> > Er, read Policy 5.6.12.
> >
> I have read it. I was simply speaking from a mathematical perspective.
But a mathematical perspective is wrong, because it does not tell how
to interpret 1.1.1
Ver
reassign 378157 procps
thanks
On Fri, Jul 14, 2006 at 10:46:52PM +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> /etc/alternatives/w points to /usr/bin/w.procps.
> procps is the package which should be associated with this bug.
Done
--
Rodrigo Gallardo
GPG-Fingerprint: 7C81 E60C 442E 8FBC D975 2F4
On Fri, Jul 14, 2006 at 05:59:33AM +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> I couldn't figure out what package "w" belongs to, hence general.
> "w" is reporting some messages on Debian GNU/kFreeBSD.
Where does /etc/alternatives/w point to in your system?
--
Rodrigo Gall
riable substitution inside string
> constants unless you force it not to with odd escape characters.
> A non-scripting language is one which has simple, clear-cut lexical
> conventions and parsing syntax."""
So, scripting language == pretty much just perl?
And, anyways, vars
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: pubtal
Version : 3.2.0
Upstream Author : Colin Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.owlfish.com/software/PubTal/
* License : BSD
Prog
37 matches
Mail list logo
