On Saturday 15 May 2010 13:47:43 Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-05-15 at 13:22 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
>
> It just shows how such stuff can completely undermine security, and one
> even haven't thought that this would possible.
This applies to any change you make to a piece o
On Saturday 15 May 2010 13:50:50 Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-05-15 at 13:45 +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
> > This paragraph should be accompanied by something like:
> >
> > Instead of adding users to other users private groups (which has issues
> > as explained above) it is recomm
> You need to explain clearly how the umask of 0002 is insecure. If you
> have members in your user private group, then your group isn't private,
> is it? UPG is designed to NOT have anyone else in your group except you.
> So, adding the write bit on the group mode does not affect security in
> the
3 matches
Mail list logo
